直流和交流双电流对采血和肌内注射过程引起的疼痛的影响。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2025.2544525
Ebrahim Ezzati, Roghaye Mahooti, Saeed Mohammadi, Rasoul Kavyannejad
{"title":"直流和交流双电流对采血和肌内注射过程引起的疼痛的影响。","authors":"Ebrahim Ezzati, Roghaye Mahooti, Saeed Mohammadi, Rasoul Kavyannejad","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2544525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the effects of cathodal, anodal, and intermittent electrical stimulation on pain intensity associated with arterial blood sampling, venous blood sampling, and intramuscular injection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a triple-blind clinical trial, 160 patients requiring arterial, venous blood sampling, and intramuscular injection were randomly divided into four groups. Three intervention groups received 5 mA anodal, cathodal direct, or alternating currents during the procedure, while the control group received only a topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after the procedure, while procedure duration, number of attempts, and heart rate changes were recorded as secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All forms of electrical stimulation significantly reduced procedural pain compared to EMLA. Cathodal direct current demonstrated the greatest analgesic effect, with mean VAS score reductions of 2-3 points across all procedures. The time required for arterial blood sampling in the cathodal group was significantly less than with EMLA, while no difference was observed in the procedure time and frequency of attempts in other processes. Furthermore, electrical stimulation groups, particularly the cathodal mode, exhibited lower post-procedure heart rates, suggesting attenuated physiological stress responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that applying electric currents during the procedure reduces the pain of blood sampling or injections. The greatest analgesia was observed with cathodal direct current stimulation compared to other groups.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Date of registration: 27 January 2024. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: IRCT20240123060780N1. URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/75119.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"807-818"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of dual direct and alternating currents on pain induced by blood sampling and intramuscular injection processes.\",\"authors\":\"Ebrahim Ezzati, Roghaye Mahooti, Saeed Mohammadi, Rasoul Kavyannejad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2025.2544525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the effects of cathodal, anodal, and intermittent electrical stimulation on pain intensity associated with arterial blood sampling, venous blood sampling, and intramuscular injection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a triple-blind clinical trial, 160 patients requiring arterial, venous blood sampling, and intramuscular injection were randomly divided into four groups. Three intervention groups received 5 mA anodal, cathodal direct, or alternating currents during the procedure, while the control group received only a topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after the procedure, while procedure duration, number of attempts, and heart rate changes were recorded as secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All forms of electrical stimulation significantly reduced procedural pain compared to EMLA. Cathodal direct current demonstrated the greatest analgesic effect, with mean VAS score reductions of 2-3 points across all procedures. The time required for arterial blood sampling in the cathodal group was significantly less than with EMLA, while no difference was observed in the procedure time and frequency of attempts in other processes. Furthermore, electrical stimulation groups, particularly the cathodal mode, exhibited lower post-procedure heart rates, suggesting attenuated physiological stress responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that applying electric currents during the procedure reduces the pain of blood sampling or injections. The greatest analgesia was observed with cathodal direct current stimulation compared to other groups.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Date of registration: 27 January 2024. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: IRCT20240123060780N1. URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/75119.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"807-818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2544525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2544525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了阴极、阳极和间歇电刺激对动脉、静脉血和肌内注射相关疼痛强度的影响。方法:采用三盲临床试验,将160例需要动、静脉血和肌肉注射的患者随机分为4组。三个干预组在手术过程中接受5ma的阳极、阴极直接或交流电,而对照组只接受局部共晶混合局麻药(EMLA)。术后立即使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛强度,同时记录手术持续时间、尝试次数和心率变化作为次要结果。结果:与EMLA相比,所有形式的电刺激均可显著减轻程序性疼痛。阴极直流电显示出最大的镇痛效果,在所有程序中VAS评分平均降低2-3分。阴极组动脉采血所需的时间明显少于EMLA组,而其他过程的操作时间和尝试频率没有差异。此外,电刺激组,特别是阴极刺激组,表现出较低的术后心率,表明生理应激反应减弱。结论:我们发现在手术过程中施加电流可以减少采血或注射的痛苦。与其他组相比,阴极直流电刺激组的镇痛效果最大。临床试验注册日期:2024年1月27日。临床试验。gov标识符:IRCT20240123060780N1。URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/75119。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of dual direct and alternating currents on pain induced by blood sampling and intramuscular injection processes.

Objective: This study investigates the effects of cathodal, anodal, and intermittent electrical stimulation on pain intensity associated with arterial blood sampling, venous blood sampling, and intramuscular injection.

Methods: In a triple-blind clinical trial, 160 patients requiring arterial, venous blood sampling, and intramuscular injection were randomly divided into four groups. Three intervention groups received 5 mA anodal, cathodal direct, or alternating currents during the procedure, while the control group received only a topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after the procedure, while procedure duration, number of attempts, and heart rate changes were recorded as secondary outcome.

Results: All forms of electrical stimulation significantly reduced procedural pain compared to EMLA. Cathodal direct current demonstrated the greatest analgesic effect, with mean VAS score reductions of 2-3 points across all procedures. The time required for arterial blood sampling in the cathodal group was significantly less than with EMLA, while no difference was observed in the procedure time and frequency of attempts in other processes. Furthermore, electrical stimulation groups, particularly the cathodal mode, exhibited lower post-procedure heart rates, suggesting attenuated physiological stress responses.

Conclusion: We found that applying electric currents during the procedure reduces the pain of blood sampling or injections. The greatest analgesia was observed with cathodal direct current stimulation compared to other groups.

Clinical trial registration: Date of registration: 27 January 2024. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: IRCT20240123060780N1. URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/75119.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信