伤口敷料防止细菌环境:一项前瞻性临床研究的结果。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Maurice Moelleken, Sebastian Heinrich Krimphove, Frederik Krefting, Christos Rammos, Anna Ewa Cyrek, Sven Benson, Joachim Dissemond
{"title":"伤口敷料防止细菌环境:一项前瞻性临床研究的结果。","authors":"Maurice Moelleken, Sebastian Heinrich Krimphove, Frederik Krefting, Christos Rammos, Anna Ewa Cyrek, Sven Benson, Joachim Dissemond","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous bacteria are found in almost all wounds. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are a particular challenge. Wound dressings are primarily intended to improve wound healing. Their protective function for the environment and other people from the potentially pathogenic bacteria has been little studied. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the effectiveness of wound dressings in protecting the environment from bacterial contamination in a prospective clinical study within routine care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with wounds of different types were studied in an interdisciplinary certified wound care centre. Examinations were performed during routine patient visits. Wound-related data were collected and fluorescence images of all wounds, wound dressings and wound exteriors were taken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients included, 68 (45%) were male and 83 (55%) were female. The wound duration ranged from 1-1399 weeks, with 77.5% being hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Wound care was provided by an ambulatory care service for 75 (49.7%) patients and by the patients themselves in 76 (50.3%) cases. A total of 67 (44.4%) patients used antimicrobial wound therapy. Using fluorescence photography, bacterial colonisation could be detected in 62 (41.1%) wounds; on the inner side of the wound dressings it was detectable in 19 (13.1%) and on the outside only in one wound dressing which had been incorrectly applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial dressings were shown to provide an effective barrier to bacterial penetration through the dressings when applied correctly. This ensured adequate protection of the environment and others from bacterial contamination when modern dressings were used correctly.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 8","pages":"564-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wound dressings protect against bacterial environment: results of a prospective clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Maurice Moelleken, Sebastian Heinrich Krimphove, Frederik Krefting, Christos Rammos, Anna Ewa Cyrek, Sven Benson, Joachim Dissemond\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2024.0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous bacteria are found in almost all wounds. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are a particular challenge. Wound dressings are primarily intended to improve wound healing. Their protective function for the environment and other people from the potentially pathogenic bacteria has been little studied. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the effectiveness of wound dressings in protecting the environment from bacterial contamination in a prospective clinical study within routine care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with wounds of different types were studied in an interdisciplinary certified wound care centre. Examinations were performed during routine patient visits. Wound-related data were collected and fluorescence images of all wounds, wound dressings and wound exteriors were taken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients included, 68 (45%) were male and 83 (55%) were female. The wound duration ranged from 1-1399 weeks, with 77.5% being hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Wound care was provided by an ambulatory care service for 75 (49.7%) patients and by the patients themselves in 76 (50.3%) cases. A total of 67 (44.4%) patients used antimicrobial wound therapy. Using fluorescence photography, bacterial colonisation could be detected in 62 (41.1%) wounds; on the inner side of the wound dressings it was detectable in 19 (13.1%) and on the outside only in one wound dressing which had been incorrectly applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial dressings were shown to provide an effective barrier to bacterial penetration through the dressings when applied correctly. This ensured adequate protection of the environment and others from bacterial contamination when modern dressings were used correctly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"564-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:几乎所有伤口都存在大量细菌。耐多药细菌是一个特别的挑战。伤口敷料的主要目的是促进伤口愈合。它们对环境和其他人免受潜在致病菌侵害的保护作用很少被研究。本横断面研究的目的是在常规护理的前瞻性临床研究中调查伤口敷料在保护环境免受细菌污染方面的有效性。方法:对不同类型的伤口患者在一个跨学科认证的伤口护理中心进行研究。检查是在患者常规就诊期间进行的。收集创面相关数据,拍摄所有创面、创面敷料和创面表面的荧光图像。结果:151例患者中,男性68例(45%),女性83例(55%)。创面持续时间1 ~ 1399周,难愈合(慢性)创面占77.5%。75例(49.7%)患者由门诊提供伤口护理,76例(50.3%)患者自行提供伤口护理。67例(44.4%)患者使用抗菌创面治疗。利用荧光摄影,62例(41.1%)伤口可检出细菌定植;在19例(13.1%)创面内检出,仅1例使用不当创面外检出。结论:在本研究中,抗菌和非抗菌敷料在正确使用时都能提供有效的细菌渗透屏障。当正确使用现代敷料时,这确保了环境和其他人免受细菌污染的充分保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wound dressings protect against bacterial environment: results of a prospective clinical study.

Objective: Numerous bacteria are found in almost all wounds. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are a particular challenge. Wound dressings are primarily intended to improve wound healing. Their protective function for the environment and other people from the potentially pathogenic bacteria has been little studied. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the effectiveness of wound dressings in protecting the environment from bacterial contamination in a prospective clinical study within routine care.

Method: Patients with wounds of different types were studied in an interdisciplinary certified wound care centre. Examinations were performed during routine patient visits. Wound-related data were collected and fluorescence images of all wounds, wound dressings and wound exteriors were taken.

Results: Of the 151 patients included, 68 (45%) were male and 83 (55%) were female. The wound duration ranged from 1-1399 weeks, with 77.5% being hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Wound care was provided by an ambulatory care service for 75 (49.7%) patients and by the patients themselves in 76 (50.3%) cases. A total of 67 (44.4%) patients used antimicrobial wound therapy. Using fluorescence photography, bacterial colonisation could be detected in 62 (41.1%) wounds; on the inner side of the wound dressings it was detectable in 19 (13.1%) and on the outside only in one wound dressing which had been incorrectly applied.

Conclusion: In this study, both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial dressings were shown to provide an effective barrier to bacterial penetration through the dressings when applied correctly. This ensured adequate protection of the environment and others from bacterial contamination when modern dressings were used correctly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信