Maurice Moelleken, Sebastian Heinrich Krimphove, Frederik Krefting, Christos Rammos, Anna Ewa Cyrek, Sven Benson, Joachim Dissemond
{"title":"伤口敷料防止细菌环境:一项前瞻性临床研究的结果。","authors":"Maurice Moelleken, Sebastian Heinrich Krimphove, Frederik Krefting, Christos Rammos, Anna Ewa Cyrek, Sven Benson, Joachim Dissemond","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous bacteria are found in almost all wounds. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are a particular challenge. Wound dressings are primarily intended to improve wound healing. Their protective function for the environment and other people from the potentially pathogenic bacteria has been little studied. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the effectiveness of wound dressings in protecting the environment from bacterial contamination in a prospective clinical study within routine care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with wounds of different types were studied in an interdisciplinary certified wound care centre. Examinations were performed during routine patient visits. Wound-related data were collected and fluorescence images of all wounds, wound dressings and wound exteriors were taken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients included, 68 (45%) were male and 83 (55%) were female. The wound duration ranged from 1-1399 weeks, with 77.5% being hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Wound care was provided by an ambulatory care service for 75 (49.7%) patients and by the patients themselves in 76 (50.3%) cases. A total of 67 (44.4%) patients used antimicrobial wound therapy. Using fluorescence photography, bacterial colonisation could be detected in 62 (41.1%) wounds; on the inner side of the wound dressings it was detectable in 19 (13.1%) and on the outside only in one wound dressing which had been incorrectly applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial dressings were shown to provide an effective barrier to bacterial penetration through the dressings when applied correctly. This ensured adequate protection of the environment and others from bacterial contamination when modern dressings were used correctly.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 8","pages":"564-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wound dressings protect against bacterial environment: results of a prospective clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Maurice Moelleken, Sebastian Heinrich Krimphove, Frederik Krefting, Christos Rammos, Anna Ewa Cyrek, Sven Benson, Joachim Dissemond\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2024.0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous bacteria are found in almost all wounds. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are a particular challenge. Wound dressings are primarily intended to improve wound healing. Their protective function for the environment and other people from the potentially pathogenic bacteria has been little studied. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the effectiveness of wound dressings in protecting the environment from bacterial contamination in a prospective clinical study within routine care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with wounds of different types were studied in an interdisciplinary certified wound care centre. Examinations were performed during routine patient visits. Wound-related data were collected and fluorescence images of all wounds, wound dressings and wound exteriors were taken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients included, 68 (45%) were male and 83 (55%) were female. The wound duration ranged from 1-1399 weeks, with 77.5% being hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Wound care was provided by an ambulatory care service for 75 (49.7%) patients and by the patients themselves in 76 (50.3%) cases. A total of 67 (44.4%) patients used antimicrobial wound therapy. Using fluorescence photography, bacterial colonisation could be detected in 62 (41.1%) wounds; on the inner side of the wound dressings it was detectable in 19 (13.1%) and on the outside only in one wound dressing which had been incorrectly applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial dressings were shown to provide an effective barrier to bacterial penetration through the dressings when applied correctly. This ensured adequate protection of the environment and others from bacterial contamination when modern dressings were used correctly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"564-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wound dressings protect against bacterial environment: results of a prospective clinical study.
Objective: Numerous bacteria are found in almost all wounds. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are a particular challenge. Wound dressings are primarily intended to improve wound healing. Their protective function for the environment and other people from the potentially pathogenic bacteria has been little studied. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the effectiveness of wound dressings in protecting the environment from bacterial contamination in a prospective clinical study within routine care.
Method: Patients with wounds of different types were studied in an interdisciplinary certified wound care centre. Examinations were performed during routine patient visits. Wound-related data were collected and fluorescence images of all wounds, wound dressings and wound exteriors were taken.
Results: Of the 151 patients included, 68 (45%) were male and 83 (55%) were female. The wound duration ranged from 1-1399 weeks, with 77.5% being hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Wound care was provided by an ambulatory care service for 75 (49.7%) patients and by the patients themselves in 76 (50.3%) cases. A total of 67 (44.4%) patients used antimicrobial wound therapy. Using fluorescence photography, bacterial colonisation could be detected in 62 (41.1%) wounds; on the inner side of the wound dressings it was detectable in 19 (13.1%) and on the outside only in one wound dressing which had been incorrectly applied.
Conclusion: In this study, both antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial dressings were shown to provide an effective barrier to bacterial penetration through the dressings when applied correctly. This ensured adequate protection of the environment and others from bacterial contamination when modern dressings were used correctly.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.