Alvin Gardner, Emma Wates, Martin Kawabata, Kavita Sanghera, Basmal Ria, Roland Fernandes
{"title":"一个闭环审计,以评估和改善所有外科专业的手术部位感染率。","authors":"Alvin Gardner, Emma Wates, Martin Kawabata, Kavita Sanghera, Basmal Ria, Roland Fernandes","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess surgical specialty performance against established national data and to assess the impact of a seven-point surgical site infection (SSI) reduction checklist on elective general surgery SSI rates; specifically, SSI rates of <1% following clean procedures and <10% following clean-contaminated surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on selected patients undergoing surgery between July-August 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure, indication, SSI management, presence of additional complication and type of SSI were recorded. Follow-up telephone calls (with patient consent) were made to capture any additional SSIs. The reaudit period analysed elective general surgical procedures between May-June 2023, with the same data parameters. A perioperative seven-point checklist was implemented during the reaudit period in elective surgical theatres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 955 patients were included in the retrospective review of data. Of these, 138 patients had developed a SSI, yielding a 14.5% SSI rate, and 249 patients were included in general surgery with 45 (18.1%) developing SSIs. A total of 38 additional SSIs were identified after telephone follow-up across all specialties, representing 3.97% of the total number of patients and 22.46% of total SSIs. The completion rate of the seven-point checklist during the reaudit period was 47% (n=100). The SSI rate was 1%, with the one reported case not having a completed checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this audit showed there was scope for improvement to reduce SSIs across specialties. A significant proportion of SSIs required admission to hospital and were only identified after telephone follow-up. The seven-point SSI reduction checklist significantly reduced the SSI rate for elective general surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 8","pages":"590-599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A closed-loop audit to assess and improve surgical site infection rates across all surgical specialties.\",\"authors\":\"Alvin Gardner, Emma Wates, Martin Kawabata, Kavita Sanghera, Basmal Ria, Roland Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2024.0185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess surgical specialty performance against established national data and to assess the impact of a seven-point surgical site infection (SSI) reduction checklist on elective general surgery SSI rates; specifically, SSI rates of <1% following clean procedures and <10% following clean-contaminated surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on selected patients undergoing surgery between July-August 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure, indication, SSI management, presence of additional complication and type of SSI were recorded. Follow-up telephone calls (with patient consent) were made to capture any additional SSIs. The reaudit period analysed elective general surgical procedures between May-June 2023, with the same data parameters. A perioperative seven-point checklist was implemented during the reaudit period in elective surgical theatres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 955 patients were included in the retrospective review of data. Of these, 138 patients had developed a SSI, yielding a 14.5% SSI rate, and 249 patients were included in general surgery with 45 (18.1%) developing SSIs. A total of 38 additional SSIs were identified after telephone follow-up across all specialties, representing 3.97% of the total number of patients and 22.46% of total SSIs. The completion rate of the seven-point checklist during the reaudit period was 47% (n=100). The SSI rate was 1%, with the one reported case not having a completed checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this audit showed there was scope for improvement to reduce SSIs across specialties. A significant proportion of SSIs required admission to hospital and were only identified after telephone follow-up. The seven-point SSI reduction checklist significantly reduced the SSI rate for elective general surgical procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"590-599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A closed-loop audit to assess and improve surgical site infection rates across all surgical specialties.
Objective: To assess surgical specialty performance against established national data and to assess the impact of a seven-point surgical site infection (SSI) reduction checklist on elective general surgery SSI rates; specifically, SSI rates of <1% following clean procedures and <10% following clean-contaminated surgery.
Method: Retrospective data were collected on selected patients undergoing surgery between July-August 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure, indication, SSI management, presence of additional complication and type of SSI were recorded. Follow-up telephone calls (with patient consent) were made to capture any additional SSIs. The reaudit period analysed elective general surgical procedures between May-June 2023, with the same data parameters. A perioperative seven-point checklist was implemented during the reaudit period in elective surgical theatres.
Results: Overall, 955 patients were included in the retrospective review of data. Of these, 138 patients had developed a SSI, yielding a 14.5% SSI rate, and 249 patients were included in general surgery with 45 (18.1%) developing SSIs. A total of 38 additional SSIs were identified after telephone follow-up across all specialties, representing 3.97% of the total number of patients and 22.46% of total SSIs. The completion rate of the seven-point checklist during the reaudit period was 47% (n=100). The SSI rate was 1%, with the one reported case not having a completed checklist.
Conclusion: The results of this audit showed there was scope for improvement to reduce SSIs across specialties. A significant proportion of SSIs required admission to hospital and were only identified after telephone follow-up. The seven-point SSI reduction checklist significantly reduced the SSI rate for elective general surgical procedures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.