一个闭环审计,以评估和改善所有外科专业的手术部位感染率。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Alvin Gardner, Emma Wates, Martin Kawabata, Kavita Sanghera, Basmal Ria, Roland Fernandes
{"title":"一个闭环审计,以评估和改善所有外科专业的手术部位感染率。","authors":"Alvin Gardner, Emma Wates, Martin Kawabata, Kavita Sanghera, Basmal Ria, Roland Fernandes","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess surgical specialty performance against established national data and to assess the impact of a seven-point surgical site infection (SSI) reduction checklist on elective general surgery SSI rates; specifically, SSI rates of <1% following clean procedures and <10% following clean-contaminated surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on selected patients undergoing surgery between July-August 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure, indication, SSI management, presence of additional complication and type of SSI were recorded. Follow-up telephone calls (with patient consent) were made to capture any additional SSIs. The reaudit period analysed elective general surgical procedures between May-June 2023, with the same data parameters. A perioperative seven-point checklist was implemented during the reaudit period in elective surgical theatres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 955 patients were included in the retrospective review of data. Of these, 138 patients had developed a SSI, yielding a 14.5% SSI rate, and 249 patients were included in general surgery with 45 (18.1%) developing SSIs. A total of 38 additional SSIs were identified after telephone follow-up across all specialties, representing 3.97% of the total number of patients and 22.46% of total SSIs. The completion rate of the seven-point checklist during the reaudit period was 47% (n=100). The SSI rate was 1%, with the one reported case not having a completed checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this audit showed there was scope for improvement to reduce SSIs across specialties. A significant proportion of SSIs required admission to hospital and were only identified after telephone follow-up. The seven-point SSI reduction checklist significantly reduced the SSI rate for elective general surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 8","pages":"590-599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A closed-loop audit to assess and improve surgical site infection rates across all surgical specialties.\",\"authors\":\"Alvin Gardner, Emma Wates, Martin Kawabata, Kavita Sanghera, Basmal Ria, Roland Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2024.0185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess surgical specialty performance against established national data and to assess the impact of a seven-point surgical site infection (SSI) reduction checklist on elective general surgery SSI rates; specifically, SSI rates of <1% following clean procedures and <10% following clean-contaminated surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective data were collected on selected patients undergoing surgery between July-August 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure, indication, SSI management, presence of additional complication and type of SSI were recorded. Follow-up telephone calls (with patient consent) were made to capture any additional SSIs. The reaudit period analysed elective general surgical procedures between May-June 2023, with the same data parameters. A perioperative seven-point checklist was implemented during the reaudit period in elective surgical theatres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 955 patients were included in the retrospective review of data. Of these, 138 patients had developed a SSI, yielding a 14.5% SSI rate, and 249 patients were included in general surgery with 45 (18.1%) developing SSIs. A total of 38 additional SSIs were identified after telephone follow-up across all specialties, representing 3.97% of the total number of patients and 22.46% of total SSIs. The completion rate of the seven-point checklist during the reaudit period was 47% (n=100). The SSI rate was 1%, with the one reported case not having a completed checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this audit showed there was scope for improvement to reduce SSIs across specialties. A significant proportion of SSIs required admission to hospital and were only identified after telephone follow-up. The seven-point SSI reduction checklist significantly reduced the SSI rate for elective general surgical procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"590-599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据既定的国家数据评估外科专业的表现,并评估七点手术部位感染(SSI)减少清单对选择性普通手术SSI率的影响;方法:回顾性收集选定的2022年7月至8月接受手术的患者的数据。记录患者人口统计、合并症、手术、适应证、SSI管理、其他并发症的存在和SSI类型。随访电话(在患者同意的情况下)记录任何额外的ssi。重新审计期间分析了2023年5月至6月期间的选择性普通外科手术,数据参数相同。择期手术室在复核期间实施围手术期七点检查表。结果:总的来说,955例患者被纳入回顾性分析。其中,138例患者发生SSI, SSI发生率为14.5%,249例患者纳入普外科,其中45例(18.1%)发生SSI。电话随访后,所有专科共发现38例ssi,占患者总数的3.97%,占ssi总数的22.46%。复核期间7点检查表的完成率为47% (n=100)。SSI率为1%,其中1例报告病例未完成检查清单。结论:这次审核的结果表明,在减少跨专业的ssi方面存在改进的余地。很大一部分ssi患者需要住院治疗,并且只有在电话随访后才被确定。七点SSI减少检查表显著降低了选择性普通外科手术的SSI发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A closed-loop audit to assess and improve surgical site infection rates across all surgical specialties.

Objective: To assess surgical specialty performance against established national data and to assess the impact of a seven-point surgical site infection (SSI) reduction checklist on elective general surgery SSI rates; specifically, SSI rates of <1% following clean procedures and <10% following clean-contaminated surgery.

Method: Retrospective data were collected on selected patients undergoing surgery between July-August 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure, indication, SSI management, presence of additional complication and type of SSI were recorded. Follow-up telephone calls (with patient consent) were made to capture any additional SSIs. The reaudit period analysed elective general surgical procedures between May-June 2023, with the same data parameters. A perioperative seven-point checklist was implemented during the reaudit period in elective surgical theatres.

Results: Overall, 955 patients were included in the retrospective review of data. Of these, 138 patients had developed a SSI, yielding a 14.5% SSI rate, and 249 patients were included in general surgery with 45 (18.1%) developing SSIs. A total of 38 additional SSIs were identified after telephone follow-up across all specialties, representing 3.97% of the total number of patients and 22.46% of total SSIs. The completion rate of the seven-point checklist during the reaudit period was 47% (n=100). The SSI rate was 1%, with the one reported case not having a completed checklist.

Conclusion: The results of this audit showed there was scope for improvement to reduce SSIs across specialties. A significant proportion of SSIs required admission to hospital and were only identified after telephone follow-up. The seven-point SSI reduction checklist significantly reduced the SSI rate for elective general surgical procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信