Yangyiran Xie, Rebecca Z Lin, Xiangyu Ji, John Fitzpatrick, Nathan D Foxworth, Qingxia Chen, Akshay S Thomas, Kisha D Piggott, Avni P Finn
{"title":"孔源性视网膜脱离玻璃体切除术后黄斑裂孔发育的危险因素。","authors":"Yangyiran Xie, Rebecca Z Lin, Xiangyu Ji, John Fitzpatrick, Nathan D Foxworth, Qingxia Chen, Akshay S Thomas, Kisha D Piggott, Avni P Finn","doi":"10.1177/24741264251362891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To identify intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for macular hole (MH) formation after prior pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective case-control study compared eyes that developed MH after PPV for RRD (cases) and those that underwent PPV for RRD without forming MH (controls). Cases were matched to controls using propensity scores based on demographic, preoperative, and RRD characteristics. <b>Results:</b> The study included 44 case eyes and 44 control eyes. Median time to MH formation was 6.3 months. MH repair was successful in 95.1% of eyes, with significant improvement in visual acuity (from 1.05 logMAR to 0.84 logMAR; <i>P</i> = .001). Use of perfluorocarbon usage was higher at the time of RRD repair in eyes that developed MH (16% vs 0%; <i>P</i> = .012). Post-PPV formation of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) prior to MH was higher in the case group (61% vs 43%; <i>P</i> = .057), as was post-PPV formation of cystoid macular edema (CME) prior to MH (75.9% vs 9.1%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> This case-control study found that eyes developing post-PPV CME are at highest risk for MH formation after surgery for RRD. The development of MH after PPV for RRD most commonly occurs several months after surgery. Mitigating the formation of ERM and treating postoperative CME are important to long-term visual prognosis after RRD repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251362891"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Macular Hole Development After Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.\",\"authors\":\"Yangyiran Xie, Rebecca Z Lin, Xiangyu Ji, John Fitzpatrick, Nathan D Foxworth, Qingxia Chen, Akshay S Thomas, Kisha D Piggott, Avni P Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24741264251362891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To identify intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for macular hole (MH) formation after prior pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective case-control study compared eyes that developed MH after PPV for RRD (cases) and those that underwent PPV for RRD without forming MH (controls). Cases were matched to controls using propensity scores based on demographic, preoperative, and RRD characteristics. <b>Results:</b> The study included 44 case eyes and 44 control eyes. Median time to MH formation was 6.3 months. MH repair was successful in 95.1% of eyes, with significant improvement in visual acuity (from 1.05 logMAR to 0.84 logMAR; <i>P</i> = .001). Use of perfluorocarbon usage was higher at the time of RRD repair in eyes that developed MH (16% vs 0%; <i>P</i> = .012). Post-PPV formation of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) prior to MH was higher in the case group (61% vs 43%; <i>P</i> = .057), as was post-PPV formation of cystoid macular edema (CME) prior to MH (75.9% vs 9.1%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> This case-control study found that eyes developing post-PPV CME are at highest risk for MH formation after surgery for RRD. The development of MH after PPV for RRD most commonly occurs several months after surgery. Mitigating the formation of ERM and treating postoperative CME are important to long-term visual prognosis after RRD repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24741264251362891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251362891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251362891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨先期平面部玻璃体切除术(PPV)修复孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)后黄斑裂孔(MH)形成的术中及术后危险因素。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究比较了因RRD行PPV后发生MH的眼睛(病例)和因RRD行PPV后未形成MH的眼睛(对照组)。使用基于人口统计学、术前和RRD特征的倾向评分将病例与对照进行匹配。结果:包括44只病例眼和44只对照眼。形成MH的中位时间为6.3个月。95.1%的眼睛成功修复了MH,视力明显改善(从1.05 logMAR到0.84 logMAR;P = .001)。在发生MH的眼睛进行RRD修复时,全氟碳化合物的使用量更高(16% vs 0%;P = .012)。病例组MH前ppv后视网膜前膜(ERM)形成较高(61% vs 43%;P = 0.057), MH前ppv后囊状黄斑水肿(CME)形成(75.9% vs 9.1%;P < 0.001)。结论:本病例对照研究发现,发生ppv后CME的眼睛在RRD手术后形成MH的风险最高。RRD的PPV后MH的发展最常发生在手术后几个月。减轻ERM的形成和治疗术后CME对RRD修复后的长期视力预后至关重要。
Risk Factors for Macular Hole Development After Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.
Purpose: To identify intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for macular hole (MH) formation after prior pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. Methods: This retrospective case-control study compared eyes that developed MH after PPV for RRD (cases) and those that underwent PPV for RRD without forming MH (controls). Cases were matched to controls using propensity scores based on demographic, preoperative, and RRD characteristics. Results: The study included 44 case eyes and 44 control eyes. Median time to MH formation was 6.3 months. MH repair was successful in 95.1% of eyes, with significant improvement in visual acuity (from 1.05 logMAR to 0.84 logMAR; P = .001). Use of perfluorocarbon usage was higher at the time of RRD repair in eyes that developed MH (16% vs 0%; P = .012). Post-PPV formation of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) prior to MH was higher in the case group (61% vs 43%; P = .057), as was post-PPV formation of cystoid macular edema (CME) prior to MH (75.9% vs 9.1%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This case-control study found that eyes developing post-PPV CME are at highest risk for MH formation after surgery for RRD. The development of MH after PPV for RRD most commonly occurs several months after surgery. Mitigating the formation of ERM and treating postoperative CME are important to long-term visual prognosis after RRD repair.