含铅眼镜对配戴处方眼镜的介入放射科医生的辐射防护评价:考虑不含铅的处方眼镜降低剂量。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Ryota Shindo, Keisuke Yamamoto, Saya Ohno, Satoe Konta, Yohei Inaba, Masatoshi Suzuki, Masayuki Zuguchi, Koichi Chida
{"title":"含铅眼镜对配戴处方眼镜的介入放射科医生的辐射防护评价:考虑不含铅的处方眼镜降低剂量。","authors":"Ryota Shindo, Keisuke Yamamoto, Saya Ohno, Satoe Konta, Yohei Inaba, Masatoshi Suzuki, Masayuki Zuguchi, Koichi Chida","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rraf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Commission on Radiological Protection has reduced the occupational eye lens dose limit to 20 mSv/year. Interventional radiology (IR) physicians are frequently exposed to high levels of scattered X-rays, and radiation protection tools, including lead glasses, are used for minimizing exposure. However, the effectiveness of lead eyewear for radiation workers who wear prescription glasses (e.g. over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been comprehensively investigated. This study evaluated the shielding effectiveness of over-glasses-type eyewear worn over plastic prescription glasses through phantom experiments. Furthermore, the dose reduction provided by the plastic lenses and front frame of the prescription glasses (excluding lead) was assessed. The over-glasses-type eyewear demonstrated high shielding effectiveness, with average shielding rates of 0.72-0.74 and 0.74-0.80 for the left and right eyes, respectively, against radiation incident from the lower left oblique, as typically encountered in clinical settings. In contrast, the plastic lenses of prescription glasses provided <9% dose reduction when it irradiated with 80- and 120-kV X-rays, indicating minimal contribution to eye protection. The plastic front frame offered a 14% reduction at 80 kV and 11% at 120 kV. These findings suggest that the front frame of the prescription glasses contributes to photon attenuation and improves overall shielding. However, the improper fit of over-glasses-type eyewear may lead to gaps, compromising its shielding effectiveness. To minimize gaps and optimize protection, IR physicians should select over-glasses-type eyewear that fits securely over prescription glasses. Additionally, combining protective tools is essential for effective eye protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"486-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Shindo, Keisuke Yamamoto, Saya Ohno, Satoe Konta, Yohei Inaba, Masatoshi Suzuki, Masayuki Zuguchi, Koichi Chida\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrr/rraf047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The International Commission on Radiological Protection has reduced the occupational eye lens dose limit to 20 mSv/year. Interventional radiology (IR) physicians are frequently exposed to high levels of scattered X-rays, and radiation protection tools, including lead glasses, are used for minimizing exposure. However, the effectiveness of lead eyewear for radiation workers who wear prescription glasses (e.g. over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been comprehensively investigated. This study evaluated the shielding effectiveness of over-glasses-type eyewear worn over plastic prescription glasses through phantom experiments. Furthermore, the dose reduction provided by the plastic lenses and front frame of the prescription glasses (excluding lead) was assessed. The over-glasses-type eyewear demonstrated high shielding effectiveness, with average shielding rates of 0.72-0.74 and 0.74-0.80 for the left and right eyes, respectively, against radiation incident from the lower left oblique, as typically encountered in clinical settings. In contrast, the plastic lenses of prescription glasses provided <9% dose reduction when it irradiated with 80- and 120-kV X-rays, indicating minimal contribution to eye protection. The plastic front frame offered a 14% reduction at 80 kV and 11% at 120 kV. These findings suggest that the front frame of the prescription glasses contributes to photon attenuation and improves overall shielding. However, the improper fit of over-glasses-type eyewear may lead to gaps, compromising its shielding effectiveness. To minimize gaps and optimize protection, IR physicians should select over-glasses-type eyewear that fits securely over prescription glasses. Additionally, combining protective tools is essential for effective eye protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"486-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际放射防护委员会已将职业性眼晶状体的剂量限制减至每年20毫西弗。介入放射学(IR)医生经常暴露于高水平的散射x射线,并且使用辐射防护工具,包括铅眼镜,以尽量减少暴露。然而,含铅眼镜对佩戴处方眼镜(如罩式眼镜)的辐射工作人员的有效性尚未得到全面调查。本研究通过模体实验评估了戴在塑料处方眼镜上的眼镜罩型眼镜的遮挡效果。此外,还评估了塑料镜片和处方眼镜前框(不含铅)提供的剂量减少。这种戴在眼镜上的眼镜显示出很高的屏蔽效果,在临床上常见的左下斜眼辐射入射下,左眼和右眼的平均屏蔽率分别为0.72-0.74和0.74-0.80。相比之下,处方眼镜的塑料镜片提供
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.

Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.

Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.

Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has reduced the occupational eye lens dose limit to 20 mSv/year. Interventional radiology (IR) physicians are frequently exposed to high levels of scattered X-rays, and radiation protection tools, including lead glasses, are used for minimizing exposure. However, the effectiveness of lead eyewear for radiation workers who wear prescription glasses (e.g. over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been comprehensively investigated. This study evaluated the shielding effectiveness of over-glasses-type eyewear worn over plastic prescription glasses through phantom experiments. Furthermore, the dose reduction provided by the plastic lenses and front frame of the prescription glasses (excluding lead) was assessed. The over-glasses-type eyewear demonstrated high shielding effectiveness, with average shielding rates of 0.72-0.74 and 0.74-0.80 for the left and right eyes, respectively, against radiation incident from the lower left oblique, as typically encountered in clinical settings. In contrast, the plastic lenses of prescription glasses provided <9% dose reduction when it irradiated with 80- and 120-kV X-rays, indicating minimal contribution to eye protection. The plastic front frame offered a 14% reduction at 80 kV and 11% at 120 kV. These findings suggest that the front frame of the prescription glasses contributes to photon attenuation and improves overall shielding. However, the improper fit of over-glasses-type eyewear may lead to gaps, compromising its shielding effectiveness. To minimize gaps and optimize protection, IR physicians should select over-glasses-type eyewear that fits securely over prescription glasses. Additionally, combining protective tools is essential for effective eye protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信