{"title":"含铅眼镜对配戴处方眼镜的介入放射科医生的辐射防护评价:考虑不含铅的处方眼镜降低剂量。","authors":"Ryota Shindo, Keisuke Yamamoto, Saya Ohno, Satoe Konta, Yohei Inaba, Masatoshi Suzuki, Masayuki Zuguchi, Koichi Chida","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rraf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Commission on Radiological Protection has reduced the occupational eye lens dose limit to 20 mSv/year. Interventional radiology (IR) physicians are frequently exposed to high levels of scattered X-rays, and radiation protection tools, including lead glasses, are used for minimizing exposure. However, the effectiveness of lead eyewear for radiation workers who wear prescription glasses (e.g. over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been comprehensively investigated. This study evaluated the shielding effectiveness of over-glasses-type eyewear worn over plastic prescription glasses through phantom experiments. Furthermore, the dose reduction provided by the plastic lenses and front frame of the prescription glasses (excluding lead) was assessed. The over-glasses-type eyewear demonstrated high shielding effectiveness, with average shielding rates of 0.72-0.74 and 0.74-0.80 for the left and right eyes, respectively, against radiation incident from the lower left oblique, as typically encountered in clinical settings. In contrast, the plastic lenses of prescription glasses provided <9% dose reduction when it irradiated with 80- and 120-kV X-rays, indicating minimal contribution to eye protection. The plastic front frame offered a 14% reduction at 80 kV and 11% at 120 kV. These findings suggest that the front frame of the prescription glasses contributes to photon attenuation and improves overall shielding. However, the improper fit of over-glasses-type eyewear may lead to gaps, compromising its shielding effectiveness. To minimize gaps and optimize protection, IR physicians should select over-glasses-type eyewear that fits securely over prescription glasses. Additionally, combining protective tools is essential for effective eye protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"486-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Shindo, Keisuke Yamamoto, Saya Ohno, Satoe Konta, Yohei Inaba, Masatoshi Suzuki, Masayuki Zuguchi, Koichi Chida\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrr/rraf047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The International Commission on Radiological Protection has reduced the occupational eye lens dose limit to 20 mSv/year. Interventional radiology (IR) physicians are frequently exposed to high levels of scattered X-rays, and radiation protection tools, including lead glasses, are used for minimizing exposure. However, the effectiveness of lead eyewear for radiation workers who wear prescription glasses (e.g. over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been comprehensively investigated. This study evaluated the shielding effectiveness of over-glasses-type eyewear worn over plastic prescription glasses through phantom experiments. Furthermore, the dose reduction provided by the plastic lenses and front frame of the prescription glasses (excluding lead) was assessed. The over-glasses-type eyewear demonstrated high shielding effectiveness, with average shielding rates of 0.72-0.74 and 0.74-0.80 for the left and right eyes, respectively, against radiation incident from the lower left oblique, as typically encountered in clinical settings. In contrast, the plastic lenses of prescription glasses provided <9% dose reduction when it irradiated with 80- and 120-kV X-rays, indicating minimal contribution to eye protection. The plastic front frame offered a 14% reduction at 80 kV and 11% at 120 kV. These findings suggest that the front frame of the prescription glasses contributes to photon attenuation and improves overall shielding. However, the improper fit of over-glasses-type eyewear may lead to gaps, compromising its shielding effectiveness. To minimize gaps and optimize protection, IR physicians should select over-glasses-type eyewear that fits securely over prescription glasses. Additionally, combining protective tools is essential for effective eye protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"486-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.
The International Commission on Radiological Protection has reduced the occupational eye lens dose limit to 20 mSv/year. Interventional radiology (IR) physicians are frequently exposed to high levels of scattered X-rays, and radiation protection tools, including lead glasses, are used for minimizing exposure. However, the effectiveness of lead eyewear for radiation workers who wear prescription glasses (e.g. over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been comprehensively investigated. This study evaluated the shielding effectiveness of over-glasses-type eyewear worn over plastic prescription glasses through phantom experiments. Furthermore, the dose reduction provided by the plastic lenses and front frame of the prescription glasses (excluding lead) was assessed. The over-glasses-type eyewear demonstrated high shielding effectiveness, with average shielding rates of 0.72-0.74 and 0.74-0.80 for the left and right eyes, respectively, against radiation incident from the lower left oblique, as typically encountered in clinical settings. In contrast, the plastic lenses of prescription glasses provided <9% dose reduction when it irradiated with 80- and 120-kV X-rays, indicating minimal contribution to eye protection. The plastic front frame offered a 14% reduction at 80 kV and 11% at 120 kV. These findings suggest that the front frame of the prescription glasses contributes to photon attenuation and improves overall shielding. However, the improper fit of over-glasses-type eyewear may lead to gaps, compromising its shielding effectiveness. To minimize gaps and optimize protection, IR physicians should select over-glasses-type eyewear that fits securely over prescription glasses. Additionally, combining protective tools is essential for effective eye protection.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO).
Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal.
Articles considered fall into two broad categories:
Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable.
Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences.
Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry.
The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.