{"title":"抑郁、焦虑和倦怠共现:一个横断面网络分析。","authors":"Qi-Qi Ge, Ji-Feng Feng, Yan-Jun Liu, Yi-Lin Wu, Ting Hu, Xiao-Na Zhou, Yun-E Liu, Wei Wang","doi":"10.1097/NMD.0000000000001845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrepancies persist regarding burnout-depression-anxiety relationships in health care workers (HCWs), hindering interventions. This cross-sectional study developed a symptom-level network model to clarify their interconnections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine hundred ninety-two HCWs completed online surveys assessing depression, anxiety, and burnout symptoms. A network model was constructed using bridge expected influence (BEI) to identify central symptoms and network comparisons to evaluate work-related stress impacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified \"psychomotor problems\" (BEI=0.96, 95% CI [0.78, 1.11]), \"irritability\" (BEI=0.85, 95% CI [0.68, 1.02]), and \"collapse\" (BEI=0.78, 95% CI [0.58, 0.99]) as central symptoms. Network comparison revealed no significant differences in the structure of symptom networks among varying levels of stress (global strength in high-stress condition: 13.50; moderate-stress condition: 13.06; S =0.44, p =.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary evidence indicates interventions targeting \"psychomotor problems,\" \"irritability,\" and \"collapse\" can be applied across varying stress levels. Targeting these symptoms might disrupt cross-diagnostic activation pathways to mitigate comorbidities in HCWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","volume":" ","pages":"227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Occurrence of Depression, Anxiety, and Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Network Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qi-Qi Ge, Ji-Feng Feng, Yan-Jun Liu, Yi-Lin Wu, Ting Hu, Xiao-Na Zhou, Yun-E Liu, Wei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NMD.0000000000001845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrepancies persist regarding burnout-depression-anxiety relationships in health care workers (HCWs), hindering interventions. This cross-sectional study developed a symptom-level network model to clarify their interconnections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine hundred ninety-two HCWs completed online surveys assessing depression, anxiety, and burnout symptoms. A network model was constructed using bridge expected influence (BEI) to identify central symptoms and network comparisons to evaluate work-related stress impacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified \\\"psychomotor problems\\\" (BEI=0.96, 95% CI [0.78, 1.11]), \\\"irritability\\\" (BEI=0.85, 95% CI [0.68, 1.02]), and \\\"collapse\\\" (BEI=0.78, 95% CI [0.58, 0.99]) as central symptoms. Network comparison revealed no significant differences in the structure of symptom networks among varying levels of stress (global strength in high-stress condition: 13.50; moderate-stress condition: 13.06; S =0.44, p =.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary evidence indicates interventions targeting \\\"psychomotor problems,\\\" \\\"irritability,\\\" and \\\"collapse\\\" can be applied across varying stress levels. Targeting these symptoms might disrupt cross-diagnostic activation pathways to mitigate comorbidities in HCWs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"227-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001845\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Co-Occurrence of Depression, Anxiety, and Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Network Analysis.
Introduction: Discrepancies persist regarding burnout-depression-anxiety relationships in health care workers (HCWs), hindering interventions. This cross-sectional study developed a symptom-level network model to clarify their interconnections.
Methods: Nine hundred ninety-two HCWs completed online surveys assessing depression, anxiety, and burnout symptoms. A network model was constructed using bridge expected influence (BEI) to identify central symptoms and network comparisons to evaluate work-related stress impacts.
Results: The analysis identified "psychomotor problems" (BEI=0.96, 95% CI [0.78, 1.11]), "irritability" (BEI=0.85, 95% CI [0.68, 1.02]), and "collapse" (BEI=0.78, 95% CI [0.58, 0.99]) as central symptoms. Network comparison revealed no significant differences in the structure of symptom networks among varying levels of stress (global strength in high-stress condition: 13.50; moderate-stress condition: 13.06; S =0.44, p =.17).
Conclusions: Preliminary evidence indicates interventions targeting "psychomotor problems," "irritability," and "collapse" can be applied across varying stress levels. Targeting these symptoms might disrupt cross-diagnostic activation pathways to mitigate comorbidities in HCWs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease publishes peer-reviewed articles containing new data or ways of reorganizing established knowledge relevant to understanding and modifying human behavior, especially that defined as impaired or diseased, and the context, applications and effects of that knowledge. Our policy is summarized by the slogan, "Behavioral science for clinical practice." We consider articles that include at least one behavioral variable, clear definition of study populations, and replicable research designs. Authors should use the active voice and first person whenever possible.