肉鸡和人类临床分离肠球菌NarAB的不同种群结构和基因组背景。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jayanth Balakuntla, Shabbir Simjee, Shrinivasrao P Mane, George Tice
{"title":"肉鸡和人类临床分离肠球菌NarAB的不同种群结构和基因组背景。","authors":"Jayanth Balakuntla, Shabbir Simjee, Shrinivasrao P Mane, George Tice","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, reports have emerged linking the NarAB genes with elevated MICs to non-medically important ionophore coccidiostat class (specifically narasin, salinomycin and maduramycin) and potential co-selection of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed all publicly accessible E. faecalis (n = 7731) and E. faecium (n = 20 594) genomes, focusing specifically on the genomes from broiler-chicken, turkeys, dogs and human clinical infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NarAB gene was more prevalent in broiler isolates (26% E. faecalis, 39.2% E. faecium) compared with human clinical isolates (2.8% E. faecalis, 2.0% E. faecium). In addition, genes associated with resistance to medically important antibiotics of clinical importance for E. faecalis and E. faecium infections were not found in the vicinity of the NarAB gene in isolates from broiler-chicken, and this refutes claims of the presence of co-selection between NarAB and medically important antibiotics. In addition, the pattern of genes near NarAB differed between broiler-chicken and human clinical isolates, as did the genomic sequence types isolated from each species.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that E. faecalis and E. faecium from broiler-chicken are unlikely to contribute resistance genes to human clinical isolates, and this should continue to inform any policy that might limit poultry farmers' and veterinarians' access to ionophore coccidiostats in broiler-chicken.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2773-2781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct population structure and genomic context of NarAB between broiler and human clinical Enterococcus isolates.\",\"authors\":\"Jayanth Balakuntla, Shabbir Simjee, Shrinivasrao P Mane, George Tice\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, reports have emerged linking the NarAB genes with elevated MICs to non-medically important ionophore coccidiostat class (specifically narasin, salinomycin and maduramycin) and potential co-selection of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed all publicly accessible E. faecalis (n = 7731) and E. faecium (n = 20 594) genomes, focusing specifically on the genomes from broiler-chicken, turkeys, dogs and human clinical infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NarAB gene was more prevalent in broiler isolates (26% E. faecalis, 39.2% E. faecium) compared with human clinical isolates (2.8% E. faecalis, 2.0% E. faecium). In addition, genes associated with resistance to medically important antibiotics of clinical importance for E. faecalis and E. faecium infections were not found in the vicinity of the NarAB gene in isolates from broiler-chicken, and this refutes claims of the presence of co-selection between NarAB and medically important antibiotics. In addition, the pattern of genes near NarAB differed between broiler-chicken and human clinical isolates, as did the genomic sequence types isolated from each species.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that E. faecalis and E. faecium from broiler-chicken are unlikely to contribute resistance genes to human clinical isolates, and this should continue to inform any policy that might limit poultry farmers' and veterinarians' access to ionophore coccidiostats in broiler-chicken.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2773-2781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,有报道将mic升高的NarAB基因与非医学上重要的离子载体抗球虫类(特别是纳拉霉素、盐碱霉素和马都霉素)联系起来,并将其与粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌中临床相关抗生素耐药基因的潜在共选择联系起来。方法:我们分析了所有可公开获取的粪肠球菌(n = 7731)和粪肠球菌(n = 20594)基因组,特别关注肉鸡、火鸡、狗和人类临床感染的基因组。结果:NarAB基因在肉鸡分离株中(26%,39.2%)比临床分离株(2.8%,2.0%)更普遍。此外,在肉鸡分离株的NarAB基因附近未发现与对粪肠杆菌和粪肠杆菌感染具有临床重要性的医学上重要抗生素耐药相关的基因,这驳斥了NarAB与医学上重要抗生素之间存在共选择的说法。此外,在肉鸡和人类临床分离株之间,NarAB附近的基因模式不同,从每个物种分离的基因组序列类型也不同。结论:这些发现表明,来自肉鸡的粪肠杆菌和粪肠杆菌不太可能向人类临床分离株提供耐药基因,这应该继续为限制家禽养殖户和兽医获得肉鸡体内离子离子孢子虫的政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinct population structure and genomic context of NarAB between broiler and human clinical Enterococcus isolates.

Background: In recent years, reports have emerged linking the NarAB genes with elevated MICs to non-medically important ionophore coccidiostat class (specifically narasin, salinomycin and maduramycin) and potential co-selection of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium.

Methods: We analysed all publicly accessible E. faecalis (n = 7731) and E. faecium (n = 20 594) genomes, focusing specifically on the genomes from broiler-chicken, turkeys, dogs and human clinical infections.

Results: The NarAB gene was more prevalent in broiler isolates (26% E. faecalis, 39.2% E. faecium) compared with human clinical isolates (2.8% E. faecalis, 2.0% E. faecium). In addition, genes associated with resistance to medically important antibiotics of clinical importance for E. faecalis and E. faecium infections were not found in the vicinity of the NarAB gene in isolates from broiler-chicken, and this refutes claims of the presence of co-selection between NarAB and medically important antibiotics. In addition, the pattern of genes near NarAB differed between broiler-chicken and human clinical isolates, as did the genomic sequence types isolated from each species.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that E. faecalis and E. faecium from broiler-chicken are unlikely to contribute resistance genes to human clinical isolates, and this should continue to inform any policy that might limit poultry farmers' and veterinarians' access to ionophore coccidiostats in broiler-chicken.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信