利用开花植物生态工程技术改善印尼稻田农业生态系统中Tungro病毒载体的生物防治

IF 3.1 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
International Journal of Food Science Pub Date : 2025-08-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijfo/2476370
Nur Rosida, Elisurya Ibrahim, Wasis Senoaji, Effi Alfiani Sidik, Ani Mugiasih, Khaerana, Rudi Tomson Hutasoit, Firmansyah, Raden Heru Praptana, Sri Sudewi, Andi Nasruddin
{"title":"利用开花植物生态工程技术改善印尼稻田农业生态系统中Tungro病毒载体的生物防治","authors":"Nur Rosida, Elisurya Ibrahim, Wasis Senoaji, Effi Alfiani Sidik, Ani Mugiasih, Khaerana, Rudi Tomson Hutasoit, Firmansyah, Raden Heru Praptana, Sri Sudewi, Andi Nasruddin","doi":"10.1155/ijfo/2476370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological engineering (EE) has emerged as a promising strategy for managing insect pests in rice ecosystems by reducing dependency on chemical pesticides. However, the survival of parasitoids and predators in rice habitats is often limited due to a lack of refuge and food sources. While pesticides remain the primary method used by farmers to control green leafhoppers (GLHs), the main vectors of the tungro virus, their overuse poses serious risks to both environmental and human health. This study was aimed at evaluating the impact of EE on the population dynamics of GLHs and their natural enemies, the suppression of tungro virus infection, and the maintenance of rice yield. Field experiments were conducted in Sidrap, Indonesia, across three dry seasons (2016, 2017, and 2021) using three treatments: EE with biopesticide (T1), prophylactic insecticide use (T2), and untreated control (T3). The GLH population was significantly lower in T1 compared to T2 and T3, while natural enemy abundance (e.g., spiders, parasitoids, and predatory beetles) was highest in T1, particularly during later growth stages. Tungro incidence was lowest in T1, moderate in T2, and highest in T3, exceeding 13% in control plots. Despite differences in pest pressure and virus infection, rice yield did not differ significantly among treatments, with the highest yield (≈10-11 t/ha) recorded in 2021. These findings suggest that habitat manipulation through EE can suppress tungro vectors, enhance natural enemy populations, and sustain rice productivity without relying on chemical inputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2476370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing Flowering Bund Plants Through Ecological Engineering to Improve Biological Control of Tungro Virus Vectors in Indonesian Rice Fields Agroecosystem.\",\"authors\":\"Nur Rosida, Elisurya Ibrahim, Wasis Senoaji, Effi Alfiani Sidik, Ani Mugiasih, Khaerana, Rudi Tomson Hutasoit, Firmansyah, Raden Heru Praptana, Sri Sudewi, Andi Nasruddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijfo/2476370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ecological engineering (EE) has emerged as a promising strategy for managing insect pests in rice ecosystems by reducing dependency on chemical pesticides. However, the survival of parasitoids and predators in rice habitats is often limited due to a lack of refuge and food sources. While pesticides remain the primary method used by farmers to control green leafhoppers (GLHs), the main vectors of the tungro virus, their overuse poses serious risks to both environmental and human health. This study was aimed at evaluating the impact of EE on the population dynamics of GLHs and their natural enemies, the suppression of tungro virus infection, and the maintenance of rice yield. Field experiments were conducted in Sidrap, Indonesia, across three dry seasons (2016, 2017, and 2021) using three treatments: EE with biopesticide (T1), prophylactic insecticide use (T2), and untreated control (T3). The GLH population was significantly lower in T1 compared to T2 and T3, while natural enemy abundance (e.g., spiders, parasitoids, and predatory beetles) was highest in T1, particularly during later growth stages. Tungro incidence was lowest in T1, moderate in T2, and highest in T3, exceeding 13% in control plots. Despite differences in pest pressure and virus infection, rice yield did not differ significantly among treatments, with the highest yield (≈10-11 t/ha) recorded in 2021. These findings suggest that habitat manipulation through EE can suppress tungro vectors, enhance natural enemy populations, and sustain rice productivity without relying on chemical inputs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2476370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijfo/2476370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijfo/2476370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态工程(EE)已成为减少对化学农药依赖、控制水稻生态系统害虫的一种有前景的策略。然而,由于缺乏避难所和食物来源,拟寄生物和捕食者在水稻栖息地的生存往往受到限制。虽然农药仍然是农民控制绿叶蝉(tungro病毒的主要媒介)的主要方法,但过度使用农药对环境和人类健康构成严重风险。本研究旨在评价EE对GLHs及其天敌种群动态的影响、对tungro病毒侵染的抑制作用以及对水稻产量的维持作用。在印度尼西亚Sidrap进行了三个旱季(2016年、2017年和2021年)的现场试验,采用三种处理:生物农药EE (T1)、预防性杀虫剂使用(T2)和未经处理的对照(T3)。与T2和T3相比,T1的GLH种群数量显著减少,而天敌(如蜘蛛、寄生蜂和掠食性甲虫)的丰度在T1最高,特别是在生长后期。Tungro发病率在T1期最低,T2期中等,T3期最高,在对照区均超过13%。尽管病虫害压力和病毒感染存在差异,但水稻产量在处理之间没有显著差异,最高产量(≈10-11吨/公顷)记录在2021年。这些结果表明,通过EE控制生境可以在不依赖化学投入的情况下抑制tungro媒介,增加天敌种群,维持水稻生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing Flowering Bund Plants Through Ecological Engineering to Improve Biological Control of Tungro Virus Vectors in Indonesian Rice Fields Agroecosystem.

Ecological engineering (EE) has emerged as a promising strategy for managing insect pests in rice ecosystems by reducing dependency on chemical pesticides. However, the survival of parasitoids and predators in rice habitats is often limited due to a lack of refuge and food sources. While pesticides remain the primary method used by farmers to control green leafhoppers (GLHs), the main vectors of the tungro virus, their overuse poses serious risks to both environmental and human health. This study was aimed at evaluating the impact of EE on the population dynamics of GLHs and their natural enemies, the suppression of tungro virus infection, and the maintenance of rice yield. Field experiments were conducted in Sidrap, Indonesia, across three dry seasons (2016, 2017, and 2021) using three treatments: EE with biopesticide (T1), prophylactic insecticide use (T2), and untreated control (T3). The GLH population was significantly lower in T1 compared to T2 and T3, while natural enemy abundance (e.g., spiders, parasitoids, and predatory beetles) was highest in T1, particularly during later growth stages. Tungro incidence was lowest in T1, moderate in T2, and highest in T3, exceeding 13% in control plots. Despite differences in pest pressure and virus infection, rice yield did not differ significantly among treatments, with the highest yield (≈10-11 t/ha) recorded in 2021. These findings suggest that habitat manipulation through EE can suppress tungro vectors, enhance natural enemy populations, and sustain rice productivity without relying on chemical inputs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Food Science
International Journal of Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Food Science is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research and review articles in all areas of food science. As a multidisciplinary journal, articles discussing all aspects of food science will be considered, including, but not limited to: enhancing shelf life, food deterioration, food engineering, food handling, food processing, food quality, food safety, microbiology, and nutritional research. The journal aims to provide a valuable resource for food scientists, food producers, food retailers, nutritionists, the public health sector, and relevant governmental and non-governmental agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信