危机中的多元文化伦理:ECMO的优先分配与批判意识的作用。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yaron Connelly, Royi Barnea, Aviad Tur-Sinai, Orna Tal
{"title":"危机中的多元文化伦理:ECMO的优先分配与批判意识的作用。","authors":"Yaron Connelly, Royi Barnea, Aviad Tur-Sinai, Orna Tal","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02597-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allocation of lifesaving technologies is a worldwide dilemma and the Covid-19 pandemic unprecedently amplified this scenario; medical teams struggled to fight the disease while demand for ECMO devices for severe patients exceeded the supply. Allocation of scarce technologies embedded socio-ethical perspective beyond clinical consideration, and we faced cultural and personal conflicts during the decision-making process. This study explores the multicultural Israeli healthcare arena, in which Arab and Jewish healthcare professionals treat Arab and Jewish patients equally, with a specific focus on the allocation of lifesaving resources and the role of cultural preferences in shaping these decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide survey was conducted among healthcare professionals during an advanced managerial academic program. A structured questionnaire was produced and referred to a scenario in which the number of Covid-19 patients who need ECMO treatment exceeded the number of available devices. Participants were asked to set allocation preferences regarding theoretical patients representing different sociodemographic statuses and reasonably justify their choices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>226 participants completed the survey. 60% of the Jewish, compared to 40% of the Arab participants declared no one should be prioritized. However, Arab participants showed a significant preference for prioritizing two age groups: the elderly and the youngest. For both Jewish and Arab participants, the main justification for prioritizing young patients was their better survival chances. In contrast, the reasons for favoring the elderly differed significantly between the groups; Arabs emphasized respect for \"wisdom and social dignity,\" while Jews highlighted eligibility based on past insurance payments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in perceptions and a range of values between Jewish and Arab participants were observed. Socio-ethical understanding and implementation of critical consciousness, offers an opportunity to increase 'doing good', assist in peers' support in complex situations and can affect the shaping of the next generation of healthcare managers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"221"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicultural ethics in crisis: prioritizing ECMO allocation and the role of critical consciousness.\",\"authors\":\"Yaron Connelly, Royi Barnea, Aviad Tur-Sinai, Orna Tal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02597-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allocation of lifesaving technologies is a worldwide dilemma and the Covid-19 pandemic unprecedently amplified this scenario; medical teams struggled to fight the disease while demand for ECMO devices for severe patients exceeded the supply. Allocation of scarce technologies embedded socio-ethical perspective beyond clinical consideration, and we faced cultural and personal conflicts during the decision-making process. This study explores the multicultural Israeli healthcare arena, in which Arab and Jewish healthcare professionals treat Arab and Jewish patients equally, with a specific focus on the allocation of lifesaving resources and the role of cultural preferences in shaping these decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide survey was conducted among healthcare professionals during an advanced managerial academic program. A structured questionnaire was produced and referred to a scenario in which the number of Covid-19 patients who need ECMO treatment exceeded the number of available devices. Participants were asked to set allocation preferences regarding theoretical patients representing different sociodemographic statuses and reasonably justify their choices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>226 participants completed the survey. 60% of the Jewish, compared to 40% of the Arab participants declared no one should be prioritized. However, Arab participants showed a significant preference for prioritizing two age groups: the elderly and the youngest. For both Jewish and Arab participants, the main justification for prioritizing young patients was their better survival chances. In contrast, the reasons for favoring the elderly differed significantly between the groups; Arabs emphasized respect for \\\"wisdom and social dignity,\\\" while Jews highlighted eligibility based on past insurance payments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in perceptions and a range of values between Jewish and Arab participants were observed. Socio-ethical understanding and implementation of critical consciousness, offers an opportunity to increase 'doing good', assist in peers' support in complex situations and can affect the shaping of the next generation of healthcare managers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02597-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02597-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:救生技术的分配是一个全球性的难题,Covid-19大流行前所未有地加剧了这一局面;医疗团队努力对抗这种疾病,而重症患者对体外膜肺氧合设备的需求超过了供应。稀缺技术的分配嵌入了超越临床考虑的社会伦理观点,我们在决策过程中面临文化和个人冲突。本研究探讨了多元文化的以色列医疗保健领域,其中阿拉伯和犹太医疗保健专业人员平等对待阿拉伯和犹太患者,特别关注救生资源的分配和文化偏好在塑造这些决定中的作用。方法:在全国范围内对参加高级管理学术课程的医疗保健专业人员进行调查。制作了一份结构化问卷,并参考了需要ECMO治疗的Covid-19患者数量超过可用设备数量的情况。参与者被要求对代表不同社会人口统计地位的理论患者设定分配偏好,并合理地证明他们的选择。结果:226名参与者完成了调查。60%的犹太人和40%的阿拉伯人认为没有人应该被优先考虑。然而,阿拉伯与会者明显倾向于优先考虑两个年龄组:老年人和最年轻的人。对于犹太人和阿拉伯人来说,优先考虑年轻患者的主要理由是他们的生存机会更大。相比之下,两组之间偏爱老年人的原因有显著差异;阿拉伯人强调对“智慧和社会尊严”的尊重,而犹太人强调根据过去的保险支付资格。结论:观察到犹太人和阿拉伯人在认知和一系列价值观上的差异。社会伦理的理解和关键意识的实施,提供了一个机会,以增加“做好事”,在复杂的情况下协助同伴的支持,可以影响下一代医疗保健经理的塑造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicultural ethics in crisis: prioritizing ECMO allocation and the role of critical consciousness.

Background: Allocation of lifesaving technologies is a worldwide dilemma and the Covid-19 pandemic unprecedently amplified this scenario; medical teams struggled to fight the disease while demand for ECMO devices for severe patients exceeded the supply. Allocation of scarce technologies embedded socio-ethical perspective beyond clinical consideration, and we faced cultural and personal conflicts during the decision-making process. This study explores the multicultural Israeli healthcare arena, in which Arab and Jewish healthcare professionals treat Arab and Jewish patients equally, with a specific focus on the allocation of lifesaving resources and the role of cultural preferences in shaping these decisions.

Methods: A nationwide survey was conducted among healthcare professionals during an advanced managerial academic program. A structured questionnaire was produced and referred to a scenario in which the number of Covid-19 patients who need ECMO treatment exceeded the number of available devices. Participants were asked to set allocation preferences regarding theoretical patients representing different sociodemographic statuses and reasonably justify their choices.

Results: 226 participants completed the survey. 60% of the Jewish, compared to 40% of the Arab participants declared no one should be prioritized. However, Arab participants showed a significant preference for prioritizing two age groups: the elderly and the youngest. For both Jewish and Arab participants, the main justification for prioritizing young patients was their better survival chances. In contrast, the reasons for favoring the elderly differed significantly between the groups; Arabs emphasized respect for "wisdom and social dignity," while Jews highlighted eligibility based on past insurance payments.

Conclusions: Differences in perceptions and a range of values between Jewish and Arab participants were observed. Socio-ethical understanding and implementation of critical consciousness, offers an opportunity to increase 'doing good', assist in peers' support in complex situations and can affect the shaping of the next generation of healthcare managers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信