{"title":"基于贝叶斯网络的自然资源损害评估的概率伤害评估与量化——以多氯联苯污染的密西尼瓦河流域为例。","authors":"April D Reed, Wayne G Landis","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. Federal Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) program gives tribes and government appointed agencies the authority to assess injury to natural resources and pursue compensatory action for resources injured or lost due to unlawful release of chemicals into the environment. This study was performed to develop and test a Bayesian network (BN) decision support tool to lend quantitative insight into natural resource injury assessment. The BN model represents the causal relationship between the released polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and three common adverse effects of PCB exposure in fish-mortality, growth, and reproductive effects-as well as a combined largest effects model (CLEM) pathway. Each endpoint of a causal pathway is a probabilistic estimation of an injured or uninjured decision based on the PCB concentration in fish tissue and toxicity data. The probability distributions from the Bayesian network's CLEM pathway results were linked to spreadsheets that automate injury quantification in units of discount service acre years (DSAYS). Probabilistic injury determinations and quantifications were performed for individual spatial subregions of the study area and for the entire site. The case study focused on the fish resources of an inactive PCB-contaminated Superfund Site in mid-eastern Indiana-the Little Mississinewa River (LMR) and the larger Mississinewa River into which the LMR drains. Using the BN tool, we determined that there was at least low-level injury to fish resources throughout the Mississinewa River and Reservoir. We found that the likelihood of injury decreased with distance from the original contaminant release site. When quantified, the injury to the entire basin totaled 94,216 lost DSAYs. A secondary analysis determined higher injury to bottom feeding species of fish. This study demonstrated that BNs can be used to characterize and quantify natural resource injury for NRDAR purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic injury assessment and quantification for natural resource damage assessment using bayesian networks: A case-study of the PCB-contaminated Mississinewa River Basin.\",\"authors\":\"April D Reed, Wayne G Landis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/inteam/vjaf103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The U.S. Federal Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) program gives tribes and government appointed agencies the authority to assess injury to natural resources and pursue compensatory action for resources injured or lost due to unlawful release of chemicals into the environment. This study was performed to develop and test a Bayesian network (BN) decision support tool to lend quantitative insight into natural resource injury assessment. The BN model represents the causal relationship between the released polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and three common adverse effects of PCB exposure in fish-mortality, growth, and reproductive effects-as well as a combined largest effects model (CLEM) pathway. Each endpoint of a causal pathway is a probabilistic estimation of an injured or uninjured decision based on the PCB concentration in fish tissue and toxicity data. The probability distributions from the Bayesian network's CLEM pathway results were linked to spreadsheets that automate injury quantification in units of discount service acre years (DSAYS). Probabilistic injury determinations and quantifications were performed for individual spatial subregions of the study area and for the entire site. The case study focused on the fish resources of an inactive PCB-contaminated Superfund Site in mid-eastern Indiana-the Little Mississinewa River (LMR) and the larger Mississinewa River into which the LMR drains. Using the BN tool, we determined that there was at least low-level injury to fish resources throughout the Mississinewa River and Reservoir. We found that the likelihood of injury decreased with distance from the original contaminant release site. When quantified, the injury to the entire basin totaled 94,216 lost DSAYs. A secondary analysis determined higher injury to bottom feeding species of fish. This study demonstrated that BNs can be used to characterize and quantify natural resource injury for NRDAR purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Probabilistic injury assessment and quantification for natural resource damage assessment using bayesian networks: A case-study of the PCB-contaminated Mississinewa River Basin.
The U.S. Federal Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) program gives tribes and government appointed agencies the authority to assess injury to natural resources and pursue compensatory action for resources injured or lost due to unlawful release of chemicals into the environment. This study was performed to develop and test a Bayesian network (BN) decision support tool to lend quantitative insight into natural resource injury assessment. The BN model represents the causal relationship between the released polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and three common adverse effects of PCB exposure in fish-mortality, growth, and reproductive effects-as well as a combined largest effects model (CLEM) pathway. Each endpoint of a causal pathway is a probabilistic estimation of an injured or uninjured decision based on the PCB concentration in fish tissue and toxicity data. The probability distributions from the Bayesian network's CLEM pathway results were linked to spreadsheets that automate injury quantification in units of discount service acre years (DSAYS). Probabilistic injury determinations and quantifications were performed for individual spatial subregions of the study area and for the entire site. The case study focused on the fish resources of an inactive PCB-contaminated Superfund Site in mid-eastern Indiana-the Little Mississinewa River (LMR) and the larger Mississinewa River into which the LMR drains. Using the BN tool, we determined that there was at least low-level injury to fish resources throughout the Mississinewa River and Reservoir. We found that the likelihood of injury decreased with distance from the original contaminant release site. When quantified, the injury to the entire basin totaled 94,216 lost DSAYs. A secondary analysis determined higher injury to bottom feeding species of fish. This study demonstrated that BNs can be used to characterize and quantify natural resource injury for NRDAR purposes.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.