Grace Brough, Ingrid Hammermeister Nezu, Kazuki Shimizu, Juniorcaius Ikejezie, Zyleen Alnashir Kassamali, Emily Dorothee Meyer, Bernadette Basuta Mirembe, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, Veronica Cristea, Sarah Mesbah Abdulhady, Friday Elaigwu Idoko, Brian Ngongheh Ajong, Ojong Ojong Ejoh, Olivier le Polain de Waroux, Silviu Ciobanu, Heather Eve Papowitz, Aron Aregay, Alina Kovalchuk, Liudmyla Slobodianyk, Altaf Musani, Abdi Rahman Mahamud, Boris Igor Pavlin
{"title":"世界卫生组织在2022年乌克兰危机前4个月基于事件的监测。","authors":"Grace Brough, Ingrid Hammermeister Nezu, Kazuki Shimizu, Juniorcaius Ikejezie, Zyleen Alnashir Kassamali, Emily Dorothee Meyer, Bernadette Basuta Mirembe, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, Veronica Cristea, Sarah Mesbah Abdulhady, Friday Elaigwu Idoko, Brian Ngongheh Ajong, Ojong Ojong Ejoh, Olivier le Polain de Waroux, Silviu Ciobanu, Heather Eve Papowitz, Aron Aregay, Alina Kovalchuk, Liudmyla Slobodianyk, Altaf Musani, Abdi Rahman Mahamud, Boris Igor Pavlin","doi":"10.1177/23265094251363918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following a nearly decade-long war in Eastern Ukraine, the conflict escalated in February 2022, and the World Health Organization swiftly began enhanced event-based surveillance (EBS) for the early detection of public health threats in Ukraine and refugee-hosting countries. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and trends of signals documented by WHO, especially examining how potential threats to human health in Ukraine and other affected countries were identified and presented during the first 4 months of the Ukraine crisis. The EBS process relied on the daily screening of information coming from different sources, and signals were categorized by public health risks. Between February 26 and June 30, 2022, a total of 208,484 articles were screened in the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources system and other sources, identifying 832 recorded signals. Most (94.1%) signals were reported within 2 days of publication of the relevant pieces of information. The most common categories of signals reported were \"healthcare capacity\" (n=283, 34.0%), followed by \"technological hazards\" (n=129, 15.5%), \"population movement\" (n=80, 9.6%), and \"infectious diseases\" (n=79, 9.5%). Among all signals, 85.5% were relevant to Ukraine. In Ukraine, the largest number of signals (20.4%) were reported from the city of Donetska. Although, resource intensiveness and appropriate balance for desired sensitivity and scope remains a challenge, EBS remains a vital surveillance method to rapidly identify potential health threats during public health events and humanitarian crises-when routine surveillance is weak or disrupted-and to contribute crucial data to guide health information management and planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":" ","pages":"251-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"World Health Organization Event-Based Surveillance During the First 4 Months of the 2022 Ukraine Crisis.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Brough, Ingrid Hammermeister Nezu, Kazuki Shimizu, Juniorcaius Ikejezie, Zyleen Alnashir Kassamali, Emily Dorothee Meyer, Bernadette Basuta Mirembe, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, Veronica Cristea, Sarah Mesbah Abdulhady, Friday Elaigwu Idoko, Brian Ngongheh Ajong, Ojong Ojong Ejoh, Olivier le Polain de Waroux, Silviu Ciobanu, Heather Eve Papowitz, Aron Aregay, Alina Kovalchuk, Liudmyla Slobodianyk, Altaf Musani, Abdi Rahman Mahamud, Boris Igor Pavlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23265094251363918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Following a nearly decade-long war in Eastern Ukraine, the conflict escalated in February 2022, and the World Health Organization swiftly began enhanced event-based surveillance (EBS) for the early detection of public health threats in Ukraine and refugee-hosting countries. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and trends of signals documented by WHO, especially examining how potential threats to human health in Ukraine and other affected countries were identified and presented during the first 4 months of the Ukraine crisis. The EBS process relied on the daily screening of information coming from different sources, and signals were categorized by public health risks. Between February 26 and June 30, 2022, a total of 208,484 articles were screened in the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources system and other sources, identifying 832 recorded signals. Most (94.1%) signals were reported within 2 days of publication of the relevant pieces of information. The most common categories of signals reported were \\\"healthcare capacity\\\" (n=283, 34.0%), followed by \\\"technological hazards\\\" (n=129, 15.5%), \\\"population movement\\\" (n=80, 9.6%), and \\\"infectious diseases\\\" (n=79, 9.5%). Among all signals, 85.5% were relevant to Ukraine. In Ukraine, the largest number of signals (20.4%) were reported from the city of Donetska. Although, resource intensiveness and appropriate balance for desired sensitivity and scope remains a challenge, EBS remains a vital surveillance method to rapidly identify potential health threats during public health events and humanitarian crises-when routine surveillance is weak or disrupted-and to contribute crucial data to guide health information management and planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Security\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"251-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094251363918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094251363918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
World Health Organization Event-Based Surveillance During the First 4 Months of the 2022 Ukraine Crisis.
Following a nearly decade-long war in Eastern Ukraine, the conflict escalated in February 2022, and the World Health Organization swiftly began enhanced event-based surveillance (EBS) for the early detection of public health threats in Ukraine and refugee-hosting countries. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and trends of signals documented by WHO, especially examining how potential threats to human health in Ukraine and other affected countries were identified and presented during the first 4 months of the Ukraine crisis. The EBS process relied on the daily screening of information coming from different sources, and signals were categorized by public health risks. Between February 26 and June 30, 2022, a total of 208,484 articles were screened in the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources system and other sources, identifying 832 recorded signals. Most (94.1%) signals were reported within 2 days of publication of the relevant pieces of information. The most common categories of signals reported were "healthcare capacity" (n=283, 34.0%), followed by "technological hazards" (n=129, 15.5%), "population movement" (n=80, 9.6%), and "infectious diseases" (n=79, 9.5%). Among all signals, 85.5% were relevant to Ukraine. In Ukraine, the largest number of signals (20.4%) were reported from the city of Donetska. Although, resource intensiveness and appropriate balance for desired sensitivity and scope remains a challenge, EBS remains a vital surveillance method to rapidly identify potential health threats during public health events and humanitarian crises-when routine surveillance is weak or disrupted-and to contribute crucial data to guide health information management and planning.
期刊介绍:
Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.