Micha T Maeder, Fabienne Foster-Witassek, Dragana Radovanovic, Marco Roffi, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Hans Rickli
{"title":"左心室射血分数对受体阻滞剂治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者一年死亡率的影响","authors":"Micha T Maeder, Fabienne Foster-Witassek, Dragana Radovanovic, Marco Roffi, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Hans Rickli","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>While the beneficial effect of beta-blocker (BB) therapy for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% is established, its role in those with LVEF >40% is controversial. We assessed the relationship between BB therapy at discharge and one-year mortality according to LVEF in a large contemporary ACS cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients enrolled in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS plus) registry between 2005 and 2024 with information on BB at discharge, LVEF, and one-year mortality were studied. The association between BB therapy and one-year mortality and the interaction with LVEF (>40% versus ≤40%) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7820 patients (65% with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction), 1570 (20.1%) had LVEF ≤40%. At discharge, 6211/7820 (79.4%) patients were on BB (LVEF >40%: 78.1%, LVEF ≤40%: 84.5%). One-year mortality was higher in patients with LVEF ≤40% versus >40% (7.1% versus 2.3%; p<0.001). Overall, BB therapy was associated with reduced mortality [unadjusted odds ratio 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.89), p=0.005]. Among patients with LVEF ≤40%, mortality was lower in patients with BB compared to those without (5.9% versus 14%; p<0.001). In contrast, in patients with LVEF >40%, mortality did not differ between patients with and without BB (2.1% versus 2.6%; p=0.3). A statistically significant interaction between BB therapy and LVEF stratum was identified (pinteraction=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data from our large, nationwide registry suggest an overall benefit of BB therapy at discharge on one-year mortality in ACS with most of the survival advantage observed in patients with LVEF <40%.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on the effect of beta-blocker therapy on one-year mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients.\",\"authors\":\"Micha T Maeder, Fabienne Foster-Witassek, Dragana Radovanovic, Marco Roffi, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Hans Rickli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>While the beneficial effect of beta-blocker (BB) therapy for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% is established, its role in those with LVEF >40% is controversial. We assessed the relationship between BB therapy at discharge and one-year mortality according to LVEF in a large contemporary ACS cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients enrolled in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS plus) registry between 2005 and 2024 with information on BB at discharge, LVEF, and one-year mortality were studied. The association between BB therapy and one-year mortality and the interaction with LVEF (>40% versus ≤40%) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7820 patients (65% with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction), 1570 (20.1%) had LVEF ≤40%. At discharge, 6211/7820 (79.4%) patients were on BB (LVEF >40%: 78.1%, LVEF ≤40%: 84.5%). One-year mortality was higher in patients with LVEF ≤40% versus >40% (7.1% versus 2.3%; p<0.001). Overall, BB therapy was associated with reduced mortality [unadjusted odds ratio 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.89), p=0.005]. Among patients with LVEF ≤40%, mortality was lower in patients with BB compared to those without (5.9% versus 14%; p<0.001). In contrast, in patients with LVEF >40%, mortality did not differ between patients with and without BB (2.1% versus 2.6%; p=0.3). A statistically significant interaction between BB therapy and LVEF stratum was identified (pinteraction=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data from our large, nationwide registry suggest an overall benefit of BB therapy at discharge on one-year mortality in ACS with most of the survival advantage observed in patients with LVEF <40%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf062\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:乙型受体阻滞剂(BB)治疗左心室射血分数(LVEF) 40%的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的有益效果尚存争议。我们根据LVEF在一个大型当代ACS队列中评估了出院时BB治疗与一年死亡率之间的关系。方法:研究2005年至2024年间在瑞士急性心肌梗死(AMIS plus)登记的患者,他们的出院时BB、LVEF和1年死亡率信息。分析BB治疗与1年死亡率之间的关系以及与LVEF的相互作用(bb0 40% vs≤40%)。结果:7820例患者(65%为ST段抬高型心肌梗死)中,LVEF≤40%的1570例(20.1%)。出院时,6211/7820例(79.4%)患者为BB (LVEF≤40%:78.1%,LVEF≤40%:84.5%)。LVEF≤40%的患者一年死亡率高于LVEF≤40%的患者(7.1% vs 2.3%;p40%,死亡率在有和没有BB的患者之间没有差异(2.1%对2.6%;p = 0.3)。发现BB治疗与LVEF层之间有统计学意义的相互作用(p相互作用=0.02)。结论:我们在全国范围内进行的大型登记数据显示,在ACS患者出院时,BB治疗对一年的死亡率有总体的好处,并且在LVEF患者中观察到大部分生存优势
Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on the effect of beta-blocker therapy on one-year mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients.
Aim: While the beneficial effect of beta-blocker (BB) therapy for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% is established, its role in those with LVEF >40% is controversial. We assessed the relationship between BB therapy at discharge and one-year mortality according to LVEF in a large contemporary ACS cohort.
Methods: Patients enrolled in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS plus) registry between 2005 and 2024 with information on BB at discharge, LVEF, and one-year mortality were studied. The association between BB therapy and one-year mortality and the interaction with LVEF (>40% versus ≤40%) were analyzed.
Results: Among 7820 patients (65% with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction), 1570 (20.1%) had LVEF ≤40%. At discharge, 6211/7820 (79.4%) patients were on BB (LVEF >40%: 78.1%, LVEF ≤40%: 84.5%). One-year mortality was higher in patients with LVEF ≤40% versus >40% (7.1% versus 2.3%; p<0.001). Overall, BB therapy was associated with reduced mortality [unadjusted odds ratio 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.89), p=0.005]. Among patients with LVEF ≤40%, mortality was lower in patients with BB compared to those without (5.9% versus 14%; p<0.001). In contrast, in patients with LVEF >40%, mortality did not differ between patients with and without BB (2.1% versus 2.6%; p=0.3). A statistically significant interaction between BB therapy and LVEF stratum was identified (pinteraction=0.02).
Conclusions: Data from our large, nationwide registry suggest an overall benefit of BB therapy at discharge on one-year mortality in ACS with most of the survival advantage observed in patients with LVEF <40%.
期刊介绍:
The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field.
While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.