使用体外Ah受体反激活试验评估多氯二苯并对二恶英、二苯并呋喃和联苯对两栖动物适用性的世界卫生组织毒性等效因子。

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cameron H Collins, Nonnie E Cook, Wade H Powell, Jon A Doering
{"title":"使用体外Ah受体反激活试验评估多氯二苯并对二恶英、二苯并呋喃和联苯对两栖动物适用性的世界卫生组织毒性等效因子。","authors":"Cameron H Collins, Nonnie E Cook, Wade H Powell, Jon A Doering","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinated an expert meeting to streamline ecological risk assessments for complex mixtures of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) by establishing 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dixoin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) equivalency factors (TEFs) for mammals, fishes, and birds. No TEFs exist for amphibians, nor have any studies investigated whether the existing TEFs for mammals, fishes, or birds are suitable estimates of DLC potency for this taxon. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the relative potency (ReP) for DLCs to assess the need for amphibian-specific TEFs. A total of 15 DLCs in addition to 2,3,7,8-TCDD were assessed in a standardized in vitro transactivation assay using COS-7 cells transfected with an expression construct for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1) from Xenopus laevis, a model amphibian. Two AHR1 paralogs (AHR1α/ahr.L and AHR1β/ahr.S) are expressed in X. laevis with comparable patterns of expression and comparable sensitivity to activation by DLCs, which suggests that RePs are independent of the specific AHR1 paralog. Compared to the corresponding WHO TEFs, 73% of RePs generated in this study for X. laevis are within 10-fold of the WHO TEFs for birds, which was more similar than comparisons to the WHO TEFs for mammals (33%) and fishes (33%). Three key amino acid residues (N325, A354, and A370) within the ligand binding domain of AHR1 are conserved at homologous positions in all 21 amphibian species with known AHR1 sequences, suggesting that RePs for X. laevis are likely applicable to most, if not all, other amphibians. Overall, this study suggests risk assessors can refer to WHO TEFs for birds when evaluating the toxicity of DLC mixtures to amphibians.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the World Health Organization Toxic Equivalency Factors of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Biphenyls for Applicability to Amphibians using an In Vitro Ah Receptor Transactivation Assay.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron H Collins, Nonnie E Cook, Wade H Powell, Jon A Doering\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinated an expert meeting to streamline ecological risk assessments for complex mixtures of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) by establishing 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dixoin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) equivalency factors (TEFs) for mammals, fishes, and birds. No TEFs exist for amphibians, nor have any studies investigated whether the existing TEFs for mammals, fishes, or birds are suitable estimates of DLC potency for this taxon. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the relative potency (ReP) for DLCs to assess the need for amphibian-specific TEFs. A total of 15 DLCs in addition to 2,3,7,8-TCDD were assessed in a standardized in vitro transactivation assay using COS-7 cells transfected with an expression construct for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1) from Xenopus laevis, a model amphibian. Two AHR1 paralogs (AHR1α/ahr.L and AHR1β/ahr.S) are expressed in X. laevis with comparable patterns of expression and comparable sensitivity to activation by DLCs, which suggests that RePs are independent of the specific AHR1 paralog. Compared to the corresponding WHO TEFs, 73% of RePs generated in this study for X. laevis are within 10-fold of the WHO TEFs for birds, which was more similar than comparisons to the WHO TEFs for mammals (33%) and fishes (33%). Three key amino acid residues (N325, A354, and A370) within the ligand binding domain of AHR1 are conserved at homologous positions in all 21 amphibian species with known AHR1 sequences, suggesting that RePs for X. laevis are likely applicable to most, if not all, other amphibians. Overall, this study suggests risk assessors can refer to WHO TEFs for birds when evaluating the toxicity of DLC mixtures to amphibians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织(世卫组织)协调召开了一次专家会议,通过确定哺乳动物、鱼类和鸟类的2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-对二恶英(2,3,7,8- tcdd)等效系数(tef),简化二恶英类化合物复杂混合物的生态风险评估。没有两栖动物的tef存在,也没有任何研究调查现有的哺乳动物,鱼类或鸟类的tef是否适合估计该分类单元的DLC效力。因此,本研究的目的是确定dlc的相对效价(ReP),以评估两栖动物特异性tef的需求。在标准化的体外转激活实验中,我们利用转染了非洲爪蟾(Xenopus laevis)芳烃受体1 (AHR1)表达构建体的COS-7细胞,对除2,3,7,8- tcdd外的15种dlc进行了评估。两个AHR1相似物(AHR1α/ahr。L和AHR1β/ahr.S)在X. laevis中表达具有相似的表达模式和对dlc激活的相似敏感性,这表明RePs独立于特定的AHR1平行体。与相应的世卫组织tef相比,本研究中对X. laevis产生的73%的rep与世卫组织对鸟类的tef相差不到10倍,这与世卫组织对哺乳动物(33%)和鱼类(33%)的tef比较更为相似。在已知AHR1序列的21种两栖动物中,AHR1配体结合区域内的三个关键氨基酸残基(N325、A354和A370)在同源位置上都是保守的,这表明laevis的RePs可能适用于大多数(如果不是全部的话)其他两栖动物。总体而言,本研究表明,在评估DLC混合物对两栖动物的毒性时,风险评估人员可参考世卫组织对鸟类的tef。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the World Health Organization Toxic Equivalency Factors of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Biphenyls for Applicability to Amphibians using an In Vitro Ah Receptor Transactivation Assay.

The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinated an expert meeting to streamline ecological risk assessments for complex mixtures of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) by establishing 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dixoin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) equivalency factors (TEFs) for mammals, fishes, and birds. No TEFs exist for amphibians, nor have any studies investigated whether the existing TEFs for mammals, fishes, or birds are suitable estimates of DLC potency for this taxon. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the relative potency (ReP) for DLCs to assess the need for amphibian-specific TEFs. A total of 15 DLCs in addition to 2,3,7,8-TCDD were assessed in a standardized in vitro transactivation assay using COS-7 cells transfected with an expression construct for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1) from Xenopus laevis, a model amphibian. Two AHR1 paralogs (AHR1α/ahr.L and AHR1β/ahr.S) are expressed in X. laevis with comparable patterns of expression and comparable sensitivity to activation by DLCs, which suggests that RePs are independent of the specific AHR1 paralog. Compared to the corresponding WHO TEFs, 73% of RePs generated in this study for X. laevis are within 10-fold of the WHO TEFs for birds, which was more similar than comparisons to the WHO TEFs for mammals (33%) and fishes (33%). Three key amino acid residues (N325, A354, and A370) within the ligand binding domain of AHR1 are conserved at homologous positions in all 21 amphibian species with known AHR1 sequences, suggesting that RePs for X. laevis are likely applicable to most, if not all, other amphibians. Overall, this study suggests risk assessors can refer to WHO TEFs for birds when evaluating the toxicity of DLC mixtures to amphibians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信