Cameron H Collins, Nonnie E Cook, Wade H Powell, Jon A Doering
{"title":"使用体外Ah受体反激活试验评估多氯二苯并对二恶英、二苯并呋喃和联苯对两栖动物适用性的世界卫生组织毒性等效因子。","authors":"Cameron H Collins, Nonnie E Cook, Wade H Powell, Jon A Doering","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinated an expert meeting to streamline ecological risk assessments for complex mixtures of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) by establishing 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dixoin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) equivalency factors (TEFs) for mammals, fishes, and birds. No TEFs exist for amphibians, nor have any studies investigated whether the existing TEFs for mammals, fishes, or birds are suitable estimates of DLC potency for this taxon. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the relative potency (ReP) for DLCs to assess the need for amphibian-specific TEFs. A total of 15 DLCs in addition to 2,3,7,8-TCDD were assessed in a standardized in vitro transactivation assay using COS-7 cells transfected with an expression construct for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1) from Xenopus laevis, a model amphibian. Two AHR1 paralogs (AHR1α/ahr.L and AHR1β/ahr.S) are expressed in X. laevis with comparable patterns of expression and comparable sensitivity to activation by DLCs, which suggests that RePs are independent of the specific AHR1 paralog. Compared to the corresponding WHO TEFs, 73% of RePs generated in this study for X. laevis are within 10-fold of the WHO TEFs for birds, which was more similar than comparisons to the WHO TEFs for mammals (33%) and fishes (33%). Three key amino acid residues (N325, A354, and A370) within the ligand binding domain of AHR1 are conserved at homologous positions in all 21 amphibian species with known AHR1 sequences, suggesting that RePs for X. laevis are likely applicable to most, if not all, other amphibians. Overall, this study suggests risk assessors can refer to WHO TEFs for birds when evaluating the toxicity of DLC mixtures to amphibians.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the World Health Organization Toxic Equivalency Factors of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Biphenyls for Applicability to Amphibians using an In Vitro Ah Receptor Transactivation Assay.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron H Collins, Nonnie E Cook, Wade H Powell, Jon A Doering\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinated an expert meeting to streamline ecological risk assessments for complex mixtures of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) by establishing 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dixoin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) equivalency factors (TEFs) for mammals, fishes, and birds. No TEFs exist for amphibians, nor have any studies investigated whether the existing TEFs for mammals, fishes, or birds are suitable estimates of DLC potency for this taxon. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the relative potency (ReP) for DLCs to assess the need for amphibian-specific TEFs. A total of 15 DLCs in addition to 2,3,7,8-TCDD were assessed in a standardized in vitro transactivation assay using COS-7 cells transfected with an expression construct for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1) from Xenopus laevis, a model amphibian. Two AHR1 paralogs (AHR1α/ahr.L and AHR1β/ahr.S) are expressed in X. laevis with comparable patterns of expression and comparable sensitivity to activation by DLCs, which suggests that RePs are independent of the specific AHR1 paralog. Compared to the corresponding WHO TEFs, 73% of RePs generated in this study for X. laevis are within 10-fold of the WHO TEFs for birds, which was more similar than comparisons to the WHO TEFs for mammals (33%) and fishes (33%). Three key amino acid residues (N325, A354, and A370) within the ligand binding domain of AHR1 are conserved at homologous positions in all 21 amphibian species with known AHR1 sequences, suggesting that RePs for X. laevis are likely applicable to most, if not all, other amphibians. Overall, this study suggests risk assessors can refer to WHO TEFs for birds when evaluating the toxicity of DLC mixtures to amphibians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the World Health Organization Toxic Equivalency Factors of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Biphenyls for Applicability to Amphibians using an In Vitro Ah Receptor Transactivation Assay.
The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinated an expert meeting to streamline ecological risk assessments for complex mixtures of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) by establishing 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dixoin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) equivalency factors (TEFs) for mammals, fishes, and birds. No TEFs exist for amphibians, nor have any studies investigated whether the existing TEFs for mammals, fishes, or birds are suitable estimates of DLC potency for this taxon. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the relative potency (ReP) for DLCs to assess the need for amphibian-specific TEFs. A total of 15 DLCs in addition to 2,3,7,8-TCDD were assessed in a standardized in vitro transactivation assay using COS-7 cells transfected with an expression construct for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1) from Xenopus laevis, a model amphibian. Two AHR1 paralogs (AHR1α/ahr.L and AHR1β/ahr.S) are expressed in X. laevis with comparable patterns of expression and comparable sensitivity to activation by DLCs, which suggests that RePs are independent of the specific AHR1 paralog. Compared to the corresponding WHO TEFs, 73% of RePs generated in this study for X. laevis are within 10-fold of the WHO TEFs for birds, which was more similar than comparisons to the WHO TEFs for mammals (33%) and fishes (33%). Three key amino acid residues (N325, A354, and A370) within the ligand binding domain of AHR1 are conserved at homologous positions in all 21 amphibian species with known AHR1 sequences, suggesting that RePs for X. laevis are likely applicable to most, if not all, other amphibians. Overall, this study suggests risk assessors can refer to WHO TEFs for birds when evaluating the toxicity of DLC mixtures to amphibians.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.