死后肋骨样本的表观遗传年龄特征。

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
ELECTROPHORESIS Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI:10.1002/elps.70014
Siqi Chen, Changquan Zhang, Dan Wen, Chudong Wang, Xuan Tang, Xue Li, Xiaoyi Fu, Jienan Li, Xin Jin, Haibo Luo, Feng Song, Ying Liu, Lagabaiyila Zha
{"title":"死后肋骨样本的表观遗传年龄特征。","authors":"Siqi Chen, Changquan Zhang, Dan Wen, Chudong Wang, Xuan Tang, Xue Li, Xiaoyi Fu, Jienan Li, Xin Jin, Haibo Luo, Feng Song, Ying Liu, Lagabaiyila Zha","doi":"10.1002/elps.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skeletal remains, often partially or completely decomposed, are among the most common biological forensic samples found at crime scenes. Analyzing these incomplete specimens to estimate the age of the deceased is crucial. Previous studies on DNA methylation-based age prediction in bones have not evaluated differences across skeletal elements or clarified how bone type influences prediction accuracy. This study focuses on postmortem rib samples-a common forensic specimen-to develop a DNA methylation-based age prediction model specific to ribs. DNA methylation levels at eight CpG sites within the ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, and FAM123C genes were analyzed using pyrosequencing in 81 postmortem rib samples and 112 postmortem blood samples, with 50 individuals providing both sample types simultaneously. The rib-derived age prediction model exhibited an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.908, whereas the blood model achieved an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.927. For the rib model, the mean absolute deviation (MAD) of the training set was 4.813 years, and the MAD of the testing set was 5.084 years. The blood model showed slightly higher accuracy in predicting the age of the same individuals. Notably, cross-tissue application of models led to significant prediction bias, emphasizing the necessity of tissue-specific calibration for methylation-based age estimation. Exploratory analysis of postmortem sternum, rib, and frontal bone samples from 12 individuals revealed no statistically significant differences in methylation levels or age estimates across bone types. However, broader generalizability of the rib model to these skeletal elements requires validation in larger, independent cohorts. This work establishes a robust age prediction framework for rib samples, highlights the critical role of tissue specificity in epigenetic forensic models, and provides preliminary evidence for potential cross-bone applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epigenetic Age Signatures in Postmortem Rib Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Chen, Changquan Zhang, Dan Wen, Chudong Wang, Xuan Tang, Xue Li, Xiaoyi Fu, Jienan Li, Xin Jin, Haibo Luo, Feng Song, Ying Liu, Lagabaiyila Zha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/elps.70014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skeletal remains, often partially or completely decomposed, are among the most common biological forensic samples found at crime scenes. Analyzing these incomplete specimens to estimate the age of the deceased is crucial. Previous studies on DNA methylation-based age prediction in bones have not evaluated differences across skeletal elements or clarified how bone type influences prediction accuracy. This study focuses on postmortem rib samples-a common forensic specimen-to develop a DNA methylation-based age prediction model specific to ribs. DNA methylation levels at eight CpG sites within the ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, and FAM123C genes were analyzed using pyrosequencing in 81 postmortem rib samples and 112 postmortem blood samples, with 50 individuals providing both sample types simultaneously. The rib-derived age prediction model exhibited an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.908, whereas the blood model achieved an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.927. For the rib model, the mean absolute deviation (MAD) of the training set was 4.813 years, and the MAD of the testing set was 5.084 years. The blood model showed slightly higher accuracy in predicting the age of the same individuals. Notably, cross-tissue application of models led to significant prediction bias, emphasizing the necessity of tissue-specific calibration for methylation-based age estimation. Exploratory analysis of postmortem sternum, rib, and frontal bone samples from 12 individuals revealed no statistically significant differences in methylation levels or age estimates across bone types. However, broader generalizability of the rib model to these skeletal elements requires validation in larger, independent cohorts. This work establishes a robust age prediction framework for rib samples, highlights the critical role of tissue specificity in epigenetic forensic models, and provides preliminary evidence for potential cross-bone applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.70014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通常部分或完全腐烂的骨骼残骸是在犯罪现场发现的最常见的生物法医样本之一。分析这些不完整的标本以估计死者的年龄至关重要。先前基于DNA甲基化的骨骼年龄预测研究没有评估骨骼元素之间的差异,也没有阐明骨骼类型如何影响预测准确性。本研究的重点是尸检肋骨样本——一种常见的法医样本——以开发一种基于DNA甲基化的肋骨特异性年龄预测模型。利用焦磷酸测序技术分析了81例死后肋骨样本和112例死后血液样本中ELOVL2、FHL2、KLF14和FAM123C基因中8个CpG位点的DNA甲基化水平,其中50例同时提供了这两种样本类型。肋骨年龄预测模型的R2值为0.908,而血液模型的R2值为0.927。对于肋骨模型,训练集的平均绝对偏差(MAD)为4.813年,测试集的平均绝对偏差(MAD)为5.084年。血液模型在预测同一个人的年龄方面显示出略高的准确性。值得注意的是,模型的跨组织应用导致了显著的预测偏差,强调了基于甲基化的年龄估计的组织特异性校准的必要性。对12个个体的死后胸骨、肋骨和额骨样本的探索性分析显示,不同骨类型的甲基化水平或年龄估计没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,肋骨模型对这些骨骼元素的更广泛的推广需要在更大的独立队列中进行验证。这项工作为肋骨样本建立了一个强大的年龄预测框架,强调了组织特异性在表观遗传法医模型中的关键作用,并为潜在的跨骨适用性提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epigenetic Age Signatures in Postmortem Rib Samples.

Skeletal remains, often partially or completely decomposed, are among the most common biological forensic samples found at crime scenes. Analyzing these incomplete specimens to estimate the age of the deceased is crucial. Previous studies on DNA methylation-based age prediction in bones have not evaluated differences across skeletal elements or clarified how bone type influences prediction accuracy. This study focuses on postmortem rib samples-a common forensic specimen-to develop a DNA methylation-based age prediction model specific to ribs. DNA methylation levels at eight CpG sites within the ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, and FAM123C genes were analyzed using pyrosequencing in 81 postmortem rib samples and 112 postmortem blood samples, with 50 individuals providing both sample types simultaneously. The rib-derived age prediction model exhibited an R2 value of 0.908, whereas the blood model achieved an R2 value of 0.927. For the rib model, the mean absolute deviation (MAD) of the training set was 4.813 years, and the MAD of the testing set was 5.084 years. The blood model showed slightly higher accuracy in predicting the age of the same individuals. Notably, cross-tissue application of models led to significant prediction bias, emphasizing the necessity of tissue-specific calibration for methylation-based age estimation. Exploratory analysis of postmortem sternum, rib, and frontal bone samples from 12 individuals revealed no statistically significant differences in methylation levels or age estimates across bone types. However, broader generalizability of the rib model to these skeletal elements requires validation in larger, independent cohorts. This work establishes a robust age prediction framework for rib samples, highlights the critical role of tissue specificity in epigenetic forensic models, and provides preliminary evidence for potential cross-bone applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ELECTROPHORESIS
ELECTROPHORESIS 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.). Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences. Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases. Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered. Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics: • Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry • Single cell and subcellular analysis • Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS) • Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing) • Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation • Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis • Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信