巴西里约热内卢bbb100初级卫生保健评价:改革15年后患者的经验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024
Otávio Pereira D'Avila, Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Mauro Cardoso Ribeiro, Vinicius Siqueira Tavares Meira-Silva, Yann Rodrigues Mathuiy, Luana Jonata Nunes de Moura, Erno Harzheim, Luiz Felipe Pinto
{"title":"巴西里约热内卢bbb100初级卫生保健评价:改革15年后患者的经验。","authors":"Otávio Pereira D'Avila, Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Mauro Cardoso Ribeiro, Vinicius Siqueira Tavares Meira-Silva, Yann Rodrigues Mathuiy, Luana Jonata Nunes de Moura, Erno Harzheim, Luiz Felipe Pinto","doi":"10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to assess the degree of orientation for PHC from the perspective of adult and child users in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The design was a cross-sectional observational study and included independent samples of child and adult users leaving medical appointments at different health units in Rio de Janeiro (RJ). The study outcome was the essential and general scores of the PCATool Brazil, categorized as High Score above 6.6 and Low Score below 6.6. Socioeconomic, health-related, service use, and general characteristic variables were also collected. A total of 889 adults and 956 children answered the questionnaire and were analyzed. The core and overall PCATool scores were slightly higher in children than in the adult sample. The overall score was 6.72, 95%CI (6.63-6.81) and 6.40, 95%CI (6.30-6.50) in adults. In the adjusted models, individuals with five or more consultations in the last year: children - (OR=1.33, 95%CI [1.01-1.75])/adults - (OR=2.63, 95%CI [1.68-4.11]) and consultation with the same doctor: children - (OR=2.34, 95%CI [1.77-3.08])/adults - (OR=3.42, 95%CI [2.19-5.32]) were associated with a higher overall score.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"30 7","pages":"e18802024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Primary Health Care in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: the experience of patients fifteen years after the Reform.\",\"authors\":\"Otávio Pereira D'Avila, Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Mauro Cardoso Ribeiro, Vinicius Siqueira Tavares Meira-Silva, Yann Rodrigues Mathuiy, Luana Jonata Nunes de Moura, Erno Harzheim, Luiz Felipe Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study aimed to assess the degree of orientation for PHC from the perspective of adult and child users in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The design was a cross-sectional observational study and included independent samples of child and adult users leaving medical appointments at different health units in Rio de Janeiro (RJ). The study outcome was the essential and general scores of the PCATool Brazil, categorized as High Score above 6.6 and Low Score below 6.6. Socioeconomic, health-related, service use, and general characteristic variables were also collected. A total of 889 adults and 956 children answered the questionnaire and were analyzed. The core and overall PCATool scores were slightly higher in children than in the adult sample. The overall score was 6.72, 95%CI (6.63-6.81) and 6.40, 95%CI (6.30-6.50) in adults. In the adjusted models, individuals with five or more consultations in the last year: children - (OR=1.33, 95%CI [1.01-1.75])/adults - (OR=2.63, 95%CI [1.68-4.11]) and consultation with the same doctor: children - (OR=2.34, 95%CI [1.77-3.08])/adults - (OR=3.42, 95%CI [2.19-5.32]) were associated with a higher overall score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"volume\":\"30 7\",\"pages\":\"e18802024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在从里约热内卢市成人和儿童使用者的角度评估初级保健的定向程度。该设计是一项横断面观察性研究,包括在巴西里约热内卢(RJ)不同卫生单位进行医疗预约的儿童和成人用户的独立样本。研究结果是PCATool巴西的基本和一般分数,分为6.6以上的高分和6.6以下的低分。还收集了社会经济、健康相关、服务使用和一般特征变量。共有889名成人和956名儿童回答了问卷并进行了分析。儿童的核心和总体PCATool得分略高于成人样本。成人总评分为6.72,95%CI (6.63 ~ 6.81), 6.40, 95%CI(6.30 ~ 6.50)。在调整后的模型中,去年就诊5次或以上的个体:儿童(or =1.33, 95%CI[1.01-1.75])/成人(or =2.63, 95%CI[1.68-4.11])和同一位医生就诊:儿童(or =2.34, 95%CI[1.77-3.08])/成人(or =3.42, 95%CI[2.19-5.32])与较高的总体得分相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Primary Health Care in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: the experience of patients fifteen years after the Reform.

The present study aimed to assess the degree of orientation for PHC from the perspective of adult and child users in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The design was a cross-sectional observational study and included independent samples of child and adult users leaving medical appointments at different health units in Rio de Janeiro (RJ). The study outcome was the essential and general scores of the PCATool Brazil, categorized as High Score above 6.6 and Low Score below 6.6. Socioeconomic, health-related, service use, and general characteristic variables were also collected. A total of 889 adults and 956 children answered the questionnaire and were analyzed. The core and overall PCATool scores were slightly higher in children than in the adult sample. The overall score was 6.72, 95%CI (6.63-6.81) and 6.40, 95%CI (6.30-6.50) in adults. In the adjusted models, individuals with five or more consultations in the last year: children - (OR=1.33, 95%CI [1.01-1.75])/adults - (OR=2.63, 95%CI [1.68-4.11]) and consultation with the same doctor: children - (OR=2.34, 95%CI [1.77-3.08])/adults - (OR=3.42, 95%CI [2.19-5.32]) were associated with a higher overall score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信