{"title":"巴西里约热内卢bbb100初级卫生保健评价:改革15年后患者的经验。","authors":"Otávio Pereira D'Avila, Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Mauro Cardoso Ribeiro, Vinicius Siqueira Tavares Meira-Silva, Yann Rodrigues Mathuiy, Luana Jonata Nunes de Moura, Erno Harzheim, Luiz Felipe Pinto","doi":"10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to assess the degree of orientation for PHC from the perspective of adult and child users in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The design was a cross-sectional observational study and included independent samples of child and adult users leaving medical appointments at different health units in Rio de Janeiro (RJ). The study outcome was the essential and general scores of the PCATool Brazil, categorized as High Score above 6.6 and Low Score below 6.6. Socioeconomic, health-related, service use, and general characteristic variables were also collected. A total of 889 adults and 956 children answered the questionnaire and were analyzed. The core and overall PCATool scores were slightly higher in children than in the adult sample. The overall score was 6.72, 95%CI (6.63-6.81) and 6.40, 95%CI (6.30-6.50) in adults. In the adjusted models, individuals with five or more consultations in the last year: children - (OR=1.33, 95%CI [1.01-1.75])/adults - (OR=2.63, 95%CI [1.68-4.11]) and consultation with the same doctor: children - (OR=2.34, 95%CI [1.77-3.08])/adults - (OR=3.42, 95%CI [2.19-5.32]) were associated with a higher overall score.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"30 7","pages":"e18802024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Primary Health Care in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: the experience of patients fifteen years after the Reform.\",\"authors\":\"Otávio Pereira D'Avila, Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Mauro Cardoso Ribeiro, Vinicius Siqueira Tavares Meira-Silva, Yann Rodrigues Mathuiy, Luana Jonata Nunes de Moura, Erno Harzheim, Luiz Felipe Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study aimed to assess the degree of orientation for PHC from the perspective of adult and child users in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The design was a cross-sectional observational study and included independent samples of child and adult users leaving medical appointments at different health units in Rio de Janeiro (RJ). The study outcome was the essential and general scores of the PCATool Brazil, categorized as High Score above 6.6 and Low Score below 6.6. Socioeconomic, health-related, service use, and general characteristic variables were also collected. A total of 889 adults and 956 children answered the questionnaire and were analyzed. The core and overall PCATool scores were slightly higher in children than in the adult sample. The overall score was 6.72, 95%CI (6.63-6.81) and 6.40, 95%CI (6.30-6.50) in adults. In the adjusted models, individuals with five or more consultations in the last year: children - (OR=1.33, 95%CI [1.01-1.75])/adults - (OR=2.63, 95%CI [1.68-4.11]) and consultation with the same doctor: children - (OR=2.34, 95%CI [1.77-3.08])/adults - (OR=3.42, 95%CI [2.19-5.32]) were associated with a higher overall score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"volume\":\"30 7\",\"pages\":\"e18802024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025307.18802024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Primary Health Care in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: the experience of patients fifteen years after the Reform.
The present study aimed to assess the degree of orientation for PHC from the perspective of adult and child users in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The design was a cross-sectional observational study and included independent samples of child and adult users leaving medical appointments at different health units in Rio de Janeiro (RJ). The study outcome was the essential and general scores of the PCATool Brazil, categorized as High Score above 6.6 and Low Score below 6.6. Socioeconomic, health-related, service use, and general characteristic variables were also collected. A total of 889 adults and 956 children answered the questionnaire and were analyzed. The core and overall PCATool scores were slightly higher in children than in the adult sample. The overall score was 6.72, 95%CI (6.63-6.81) and 6.40, 95%CI (6.30-6.50) in adults. In the adjusted models, individuals with five or more consultations in the last year: children - (OR=1.33, 95%CI [1.01-1.75])/adults - (OR=2.63, 95%CI [1.68-4.11]) and consultation with the same doctor: children - (OR=2.34, 95%CI [1.77-3.08])/adults - (OR=3.42, 95%CI [2.19-5.32]) were associated with a higher overall score.
期刊介绍:
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.