断层合成后十年的乳房x光筛查:综合乳房x光检查在大型卫生系统中的不同应用。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xinhua Li, Catherine S Giess, Sona A Chikarmane, Madan M Rehani, Theodore A Marschall, Kai Yang, Bob Liu
{"title":"断层合成后十年的乳房x光筛查:综合乳房x光检查在大型卫生系统中的不同应用。","authors":"Xinhua Li, Catherine S Giess, Sona A Chikarmane, Madan M Rehani, Theodore A Marschall, Kai Yang, Bob Liu","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional acquisition (2D) was approved in 2011 for breast cancer screening in the U.S. To reduce radiation dose to breasts, synthetic mammography (SM) was developed and approved to replace 2D with combo DBT in 2013. This retrospective study of screening practices in a large, incompletely integrated health system, assesses extent of SM utilization, and examines its impact on average glandular dose (AGD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive screening exams on 61 mammography systems at nine hospitals from February 26 to March 12, 2023, were examined. Data collection included patient exams and radiation exposure. Comprehensive analysis included number of 2D acquisitions, three-dimensional (3D) views, breast thickness, and AGD. Comparative assessments were made across the health system cohort and individual hospitals. Statistical analysis was performed using the R statistical software (version 4.3.2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 6849 screening exams on 13,484 breasts (thickness, 5.96 ± 1.47 cm) that received 3D views (13482/13484, or 99.99%) and 2D acquisitions (9459/13484, or 70.15%). For average breast thickness (about 6 cm), mean AGD per breast was 0.29-5.32 mGy (2D only), 4-6.1 mGy (3D only), and 5.5-9.94 mGy (2D/3D). Three hospitals preferentially used SM (81.3-93.5% of breasts). For an average breast, the ratio of mean AGD(3D) without 2D acquisitions to mean AGD(3D + 2D) with 2D acquisitions was 0.589 (95% CI: 0.561-0.619), 0.625 (0.563-0.702), and 0.588 (0.508-0.696), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synthetic mammography reduces AGD. There is a need to review recurring screening mammographic exams and optimize patient doses by adopting synthetic mammography, where it meets the clinic's requirements.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Synthetic mammography reduces average glandular dose by 36.5%, but only three of nine hospitals within the same large health system have adopted this technology. Breast centers should consider reviewing their imaging protocols to optimize radiation doses for patients undergoing annual screening mammography with synthetic mammography.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening mammography a decade post-tomosynthesis: Varied utilization of synthetic mammography across a large health system.\",\"authors\":\"Xinhua Li, Catherine S Giess, Sona A Chikarmane, Madan M Rehani, Theodore A Marschall, Kai Yang, Bob Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional acquisition (2D) was approved in 2011 for breast cancer screening in the U.S. To reduce radiation dose to breasts, synthetic mammography (SM) was developed and approved to replace 2D with combo DBT in 2013. This retrospective study of screening practices in a large, incompletely integrated health system, assesses extent of SM utilization, and examines its impact on average glandular dose (AGD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive screening exams on 61 mammography systems at nine hospitals from February 26 to March 12, 2023, were examined. Data collection included patient exams and radiation exposure. Comprehensive analysis included number of 2D acquisitions, three-dimensional (3D) views, breast thickness, and AGD. Comparative assessments were made across the health system cohort and individual hospitals. Statistical analysis was performed using the R statistical software (version 4.3.2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 6849 screening exams on 13,484 breasts (thickness, 5.96 ± 1.47 cm) that received 3D views (13482/13484, or 99.99%) and 2D acquisitions (9459/13484, or 70.15%). For average breast thickness (about 6 cm), mean AGD per breast was 0.29-5.32 mGy (2D only), 4-6.1 mGy (3D only), and 5.5-9.94 mGy (2D/3D). Three hospitals preferentially used SM (81.3-93.5% of breasts). For an average breast, the ratio of mean AGD(3D) without 2D acquisitions to mean AGD(3D + 2D) with 2D acquisitions was 0.589 (95% CI: 0.561-0.619), 0.625 (0.563-0.702), and 0.588 (0.508-0.696), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synthetic mammography reduces AGD. There is a need to review recurring screening mammographic exams and optimize patient doses by adopting synthetic mammography, where it meets the clinic's requirements.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Synthetic mammography reduces average glandular dose by 36.5%, but only three of nine hospitals within the same large health system have adopted this technology. Breast centers should consider reviewing their imaging protocols to optimize radiation doses for patients undergoing annual screening mammography with synthetic mammography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)与二维采集(2D)于2011年在美国被批准用于乳腺癌筛查。为了减少对乳房的辐射剂量,合成乳房x线摄影(SM)于2013年被开发并批准以联合DBT取代2D。本回顾性研究在一个大型的、不完全整合的卫生系统中筛查实践,评估SM的使用程度,并检查其对平均腺剂量(AGD)的影响。方法:对2023年2月26日至3月12日9所医院61套乳腺x线系统进行连续筛查检查。数据收集包括患者检查和辐射暴露。综合分析包括2D采集数量、三维(3D)视图、乳房厚度和AGD。对整个卫生系统队列和个别医院进行了比较评估。采用R统计软件(4.3.2版)进行统计分析。结果:本研究共对13484个乳房(厚度5.96±1.47 cm)进行了6849次筛查,其中3D影像(13482/13484,占99.99%)和2D影像(9459/13484,占70.15%)。对于平均乳房厚度(约6 cm),每个乳房的平均AGD为0.29-5.32 mGy(仅2D), 4-6.1 mGy(仅3D)和5.5-9.94 mGy (2D/3D)。3家医院优先使用SM(81.3-93.5%)。对于一个普通乳房,无2D成像的平均AGD(3D)与2D成像的平均AGD(3D + 2D)之比分别为0.589 (95% CI: 0.561-0.619)、0.625(0.563-0.702)和0.588(0.508-0.696)。结论:合成乳房x线摄影可降低AGD。有必要审查反复筛查乳房x光检查,并通过采用符合临床要求的合成乳房x光检查来优化患者剂量。知识的进步:合成乳房x光检查可使平均腺体剂量降低36.5%,但在同一大型卫生系统的9家医院中,只有3家采用了这项技术。乳腺中心应考虑审查其成像方案,以优化每年接受人工乳房x光检查的患者的辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening mammography a decade post-tomosynthesis: Varied utilization of synthetic mammography across a large health system.

Objectives: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional acquisition (2D) was approved in 2011 for breast cancer screening in the U.S. To reduce radiation dose to breasts, synthetic mammography (SM) was developed and approved to replace 2D with combo DBT in 2013. This retrospective study of screening practices in a large, incompletely integrated health system, assesses extent of SM utilization, and examines its impact on average glandular dose (AGD).

Methods: Consecutive screening exams on 61 mammography systems at nine hospitals from February 26 to March 12, 2023, were examined. Data collection included patient exams and radiation exposure. Comprehensive analysis included number of 2D acquisitions, three-dimensional (3D) views, breast thickness, and AGD. Comparative assessments were made across the health system cohort and individual hospitals. Statistical analysis was performed using the R statistical software (version 4.3.2).

Results: This study included 6849 screening exams on 13,484 breasts (thickness, 5.96 ± 1.47 cm) that received 3D views (13482/13484, or 99.99%) and 2D acquisitions (9459/13484, or 70.15%). For average breast thickness (about 6 cm), mean AGD per breast was 0.29-5.32 mGy (2D only), 4-6.1 mGy (3D only), and 5.5-9.94 mGy (2D/3D). Three hospitals preferentially used SM (81.3-93.5% of breasts). For an average breast, the ratio of mean AGD(3D) without 2D acquisitions to mean AGD(3D + 2D) with 2D acquisitions was 0.589 (95% CI: 0.561-0.619), 0.625 (0.563-0.702), and 0.588 (0.508-0.696), respectively.

Conclusions: Synthetic mammography reduces AGD. There is a need to review recurring screening mammographic exams and optimize patient doses by adopting synthetic mammography, where it meets the clinic's requirements.

Advances in knowledge: Synthetic mammography reduces average glandular dose by 36.5%, but only three of nine hospitals within the same large health system have adopted this technology. Breast centers should consider reviewing their imaging protocols to optimize radiation doses for patients undergoing annual screening mammography with synthetic mammography.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信