Hoby Fenitra Rabesandratra, Chiarella Mattern, Emilia Brazy-Nancy, Aina Harimanana, Judickaelle Irinantenaina, Hobisoa Léa Razanadranaivo, Pierrette Tianiaina Daniella Andrianambinintsoa, Catherine Dentinger, Laura Steinhardt, Andres Garchitorena
{"title":"在马达加斯加将社区疟疾管理扩展到所有年龄段的可接受性和可行性的人类学分析:国家规模的水平和挑战。","authors":"Hoby Fenitra Rabesandratra, Chiarella Mattern, Emilia Brazy-Nancy, Aina Harimanana, Judickaelle Irinantenaina, Hobisoa Léa Razanadranaivo, Pierrette Tianiaina Daniella Andrianambinintsoa, Catherine Dentinger, Laura Steinhardt, Andres Garchitorena","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant progress in reducing malaria effects in recent decades, malaria remains a major challenge in Madagascar. Geographic and financial barriers often prevent individuals from seeking prompt care. Community health workers (CHWs) in many countries, including Madagascar, provide malaria case management services to children younger than 5 years old, although they typically do not treat older children and adults, leaving a gap for those living far from health facilities. To determine the efficacy of expanding malaria community case management (mCCM) to community members of all ages, a cluster randomized trial was conducted in one district of Madagascar from November 2020 to December 2021. Qualitative surveys were conducted to describe the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention among beneficiaries and CHWs. For this purpose, 87 semistructured interviews and 12 focus groups were conducted in intervention and control arms of the study to assess understanding of malaria, behaviors related to care seeking for fever, perceptions of CHW roles, and acceptability and feasibility of the age-expanded mCCM. Two major findings emerged. First, stakeholders found age-expanded mCCM to be consistent with existing CHW roles and practices. Age-expanded mCCM induced a recognition of adults' susceptibility to malaria and led to a more accurate understanding of malaria. Second, structural and community-based challenges were not fully resolved by age-expanded mCCM, and some, such as the question of the cost of care, emerged after its implementation. Despite the fact that age-expanded mCCM was acceptable to beneficiaries and CHWs, successful scale-up will require addressing structural challenges and sociodemographic inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Anthropological Analysis of Acceptability and Feasibility of Expanding Community-Based Malaria Management to All Ages in Madagascar: Levers and Challenges for National Scale-Up.\",\"authors\":\"Hoby Fenitra Rabesandratra, Chiarella Mattern, Emilia Brazy-Nancy, Aina Harimanana, Judickaelle Irinantenaina, Hobisoa Léa Razanadranaivo, Pierrette Tianiaina Daniella Andrianambinintsoa, Catherine Dentinger, Laura Steinhardt, Andres Garchitorena\",\"doi\":\"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite significant progress in reducing malaria effects in recent decades, malaria remains a major challenge in Madagascar. Geographic and financial barriers often prevent individuals from seeking prompt care. Community health workers (CHWs) in many countries, including Madagascar, provide malaria case management services to children younger than 5 years old, although they typically do not treat older children and adults, leaving a gap for those living far from health facilities. To determine the efficacy of expanding malaria community case management (mCCM) to community members of all ages, a cluster randomized trial was conducted in one district of Madagascar from November 2020 to December 2021. Qualitative surveys were conducted to describe the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention among beneficiaries and CHWs. For this purpose, 87 semistructured interviews and 12 focus groups were conducted in intervention and control arms of the study to assess understanding of malaria, behaviors related to care seeking for fever, perceptions of CHW roles, and acceptability and feasibility of the age-expanded mCCM. Two major findings emerged. First, stakeholders found age-expanded mCCM to be consistent with existing CHW roles and practices. Age-expanded mCCM induced a recognition of adults' susceptibility to malaria and led to a more accurate understanding of malaria. Second, structural and community-based challenges were not fully resolved by age-expanded mCCM, and some, such as the question of the cost of care, emerged after its implementation. Despite the fact that age-expanded mCCM was acceptable to beneficiaries and CHWs, successful scale-up will require addressing structural challenges and sociodemographic inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0678\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Anthropological Analysis of Acceptability and Feasibility of Expanding Community-Based Malaria Management to All Ages in Madagascar: Levers and Challenges for National Scale-Up.
Despite significant progress in reducing malaria effects in recent decades, malaria remains a major challenge in Madagascar. Geographic and financial barriers often prevent individuals from seeking prompt care. Community health workers (CHWs) in many countries, including Madagascar, provide malaria case management services to children younger than 5 years old, although they typically do not treat older children and adults, leaving a gap for those living far from health facilities. To determine the efficacy of expanding malaria community case management (mCCM) to community members of all ages, a cluster randomized trial was conducted in one district of Madagascar from November 2020 to December 2021. Qualitative surveys were conducted to describe the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention among beneficiaries and CHWs. For this purpose, 87 semistructured interviews and 12 focus groups were conducted in intervention and control arms of the study to assess understanding of malaria, behaviors related to care seeking for fever, perceptions of CHW roles, and acceptability and feasibility of the age-expanded mCCM. Two major findings emerged. First, stakeholders found age-expanded mCCM to be consistent with existing CHW roles and practices. Age-expanded mCCM induced a recognition of adults' susceptibility to malaria and led to a more accurate understanding of malaria. Second, structural and community-based challenges were not fully resolved by age-expanded mCCM, and some, such as the question of the cost of care, emerged after its implementation. Despite the fact that age-expanded mCCM was acceptable to beneficiaries and CHWs, successful scale-up will require addressing structural challenges and sociodemographic inequalities.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine.
The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development.
The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal.
Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries