孕前护理:评估埃塞俄比亚三级医院医生的知识、态度和做法。

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS
AJP Reports Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2667-6662
Habtamu Dagnew Demsew, Atirsaw Ebabey, Winta Tsehaye, Nigat Amsalu Addis, Adane Nigusie, Nurhussien Riskey Arefayne, Demelash Gedefaye Anteneh, Belete Muluadam Admassie
{"title":"孕前护理:评估埃塞俄比亚三级医院医生的知识、态度和做法。","authors":"Habtamu Dagnew Demsew, Atirsaw Ebabey, Winta Tsehaye, Nigat Amsalu Addis, Adane Nigusie, Nurhussien Riskey Arefayne, Demelash Gedefaye Anteneh, Belete Muluadam Admassie","doi":"10.1055/a-2667-6662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preconception care (PCC) involves interventions before conception to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet it remains underutilized in many regions. Its availability influenced by both women's awareness and HCPs' expertise. This study aimed to assess physician's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding PCC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess physicians knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to PCC and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 20 to May 30, 2023, on 251 physicians. Data were collected using a pretested, semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using Stata version 14. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with PCC knowledge, attitudes, and practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 251 physicians, 133 (52.99%) had strong PCC practices, 180 (71.71%) had good knowledge, and 143 (56.97%) demonstrated positive attitudes. Significant factors influencing knowledge included working department (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.02) and reading PCC guidelines (AOR = 1.82). Strong PCC practices were linked to working department (AOR = 2.74), reading about PCC (AOR = 2.86), and perceptions of who should provide PCC (AOR = 2.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>Physicians' expertise in PCC is enhanced by reading guidelines and working in obstetrics and gynecology. Regular review of PCC resources is recommended to improve knowledge and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":"e129-e141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preconception Care: Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Physicians at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Habtamu Dagnew Demsew, Atirsaw Ebabey, Winta Tsehaye, Nigat Amsalu Addis, Adane Nigusie, Nurhussien Riskey Arefayne, Demelash Gedefaye Anteneh, Belete Muluadam Admassie\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2667-6662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preconception care (PCC) involves interventions before conception to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet it remains underutilized in many regions. Its availability influenced by both women's awareness and HCPs' expertise. This study aimed to assess physician's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding PCC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess physicians knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to PCC and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 20 to May 30, 2023, on 251 physicians. Data were collected using a pretested, semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using Stata version 14. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with PCC knowledge, attitudes, and practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 251 physicians, 133 (52.99%) had strong PCC practices, 180 (71.71%) had good knowledge, and 143 (56.97%) demonstrated positive attitudes. Significant factors influencing knowledge included working department (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.02) and reading PCC guidelines (AOR = 1.82). Strong PCC practices were linked to working department (AOR = 2.74), reading about PCC (AOR = 2.86), and perceptions of who should provide PCC (AOR = 2.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>Physicians' expertise in PCC is enhanced by reading guidelines and working in obstetrics and gynecology. Regular review of PCC resources is recommended to improve knowledge and practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJP Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"e129-e141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJP Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2667-6662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2667-6662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:孕前保健(PCC)涉及孕前干预措施,以防止不良妊娠结局,但在许多地区仍未充分利用。它的可得性受到妇女的认识和医务人员的专业知识的影响。本研究旨在评估医生对PCC的知识、态度和实践。目的:了解医生对PCC的知识、态度、实践及相关因素。方法:于2023年3月20日至5月30日对251名医生进行横断面研究。使用预测试的半结构化问卷收集数据,并使用Stata version 14进行分析。使用双变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定与PCC知识,态度和实践相关的因素。结果:251名医师中,133名(52.99%)医师有较强的PCC实践,180名(71.71%)医师有较好的PCC知识,143名(56.97%)医师持积极态度。影响知识的显著因素包括工作部门(调整优势比[AOR] = 3.02)和阅读PCC指南(AOR = 1.82)。较强的PCC实践与工作部门(AOR = 2.74)、阅读PCC (AOR = 2.86)以及谁应该提供PCC的认知(AOR = 2.21)有关。结论和建议:通过阅读指南和在妇产科工作,提高了医生在PCC方面的专业知识。建议定期审查PCC资源,以改进知识和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preconception Care: Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Physicians at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.

Preconception Care: Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Physicians at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.

Preconception Care: Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Physicians at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.

Background: Preconception care (PCC) involves interventions before conception to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet it remains underutilized in many regions. Its availability influenced by both women's awareness and HCPs' expertise. This study aimed to assess physician's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding PCC.

Objective: To assess physicians knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to PCC and associated factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 20 to May 30, 2023, on 251 physicians. Data were collected using a pretested, semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using Stata version 14. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with PCC knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Results: From 251 physicians, 133 (52.99%) had strong PCC practices, 180 (71.71%) had good knowledge, and 143 (56.97%) demonstrated positive attitudes. Significant factors influencing knowledge included working department (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.02) and reading PCC guidelines (AOR = 1.82). Strong PCC practices were linked to working department (AOR = 2.74), reading about PCC (AOR = 2.86), and perceptions of who should provide PCC (AOR = 2.21).

Conclusion and recommendation: Physicians' expertise in PCC is enhanced by reading guidelines and working in obstetrics and gynecology. Regular review of PCC resources is recommended to improve knowledge and practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJP Reports
AJP Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信