灰水污染物处理技术综述:重点是表面活性剂。

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126861
Yenifer González, Valentina Carrillo, Gloria Gómez, Marta Carballa, Gladys Vidal
{"title":"灰水污染物处理技术综述:重点是表面活性剂。","authors":"Yenifer González, Valentina Carrillo, Gloria Gómez, Marta Carballa, Gladys Vidal","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surfactants are considered a key pollutant in greywater (GW). However, there is no consensus on the best technologies for their removal. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the main lines of GW research. Recent literature on GW characteristics, surfactant characteristics, toxicity and treatment technologies are analyzed along with case studies of GW reuse. The bibliometric analysis shows that 69 % of the studies on GW involve surfactants, and physicochemical technologies predominate with 13.5 % of the total studies. However, the toxicity of surfactants has been scarcely addressed (10 % of the articles). Anionic surfactants represent 60 % of the world production of surfactants. Concentrations in GW range from 7 to 436 mg/L and their toxicity measured as lethal concentration 50 (LC<sub>50</sub>) varies between 0.027 and 92 mg/L. Physicochemical treatments show a removal efficiency between 22 and 99 % of anionic surfactants, while biological and advanced systems show between 53 and 99 % removal efficiency. Furthermore, combined treatments show removal efficiencies between 78 and 99 %. However, high costs of advanced systems limit their application on a large scale. In this sense, low-cost alternatives such as the use of reused adsorbent materials, natural solutions and disinfection systems could offer up to 98 % surfactant removal. Regarding effluent toxicity, more research is needed, since limited studies address this gap. Moreover, it is unclear whether there will be a synergistic or antagonistic effect on the toxicity caused by surfactants and other pollutants on organisms and species. Along with this, the study of surfactant transformation products by different technologies and their toxicity is presented as a new research gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"392 ","pages":"126861"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive review of treatment technologies for greywater contaminants: an emphasis on surfactants.\",\"authors\":\"Yenifer González, Valentina Carrillo, Gloria Gómez, Marta Carballa, Gladys Vidal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surfactants are considered a key pollutant in greywater (GW). However, there is no consensus on the best technologies for their removal. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the main lines of GW research. Recent literature on GW characteristics, surfactant characteristics, toxicity and treatment technologies are analyzed along with case studies of GW reuse. The bibliometric analysis shows that 69 % of the studies on GW involve surfactants, and physicochemical technologies predominate with 13.5 % of the total studies. However, the toxicity of surfactants has been scarcely addressed (10 % of the articles). Anionic surfactants represent 60 % of the world production of surfactants. Concentrations in GW range from 7 to 436 mg/L and their toxicity measured as lethal concentration 50 (LC<sub>50</sub>) varies between 0.027 and 92 mg/L. Physicochemical treatments show a removal efficiency between 22 and 99 % of anionic surfactants, while biological and advanced systems show between 53 and 99 % removal efficiency. Furthermore, combined treatments show removal efficiencies between 78 and 99 %. However, high costs of advanced systems limit their application on a large scale. In this sense, low-cost alternatives such as the use of reused adsorbent materials, natural solutions and disinfection systems could offer up to 98 % surfactant removal. Regarding effluent toxicity, more research is needed, since limited studies address this gap. Moreover, it is unclear whether there will be a synergistic or antagonistic effect on the toxicity caused by surfactants and other pollutants on organisms and species. Along with this, the study of surfactant transformation products by different technologies and their toxicity is presented as a new research gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"392 \",\"pages\":\"126861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126861\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

表面活性剂被认为是污水处理中的关键污染物。然而,对于去除它们的最佳技术还没有达成共识。本文对GW研究的主线进行了全面分析。本文分析了近年来国内外关于GW特性、表面活性剂特性、毒性和处理技术等方面的文献,并对GW的回用进行了实例分析。文献计量分析表明,69%的研究涉及表面活性剂,其中物理化学技术占主导地位,占13.5%。然而,表面活性剂的毒性几乎没有涉及(10%的文章)。阴离子表面活性剂占世界表面活性剂产量的60%。GW的浓度范围为7 ~ 436 mg/L,致死浓度50 (LC50)在0.027 ~ 92 mg/L之间。物理化学处理对阴离子表面活性剂的去除率在22% ~ 99%之间,而生物和先进系统的去除率在53% ~ 99%之间。此外,联合处理的去除率在78% ~ 99%之间。然而,先进系统的高成本限制了它们的大规模应用。从这个意义上说,低成本的替代品,如使用重复使用的吸附材料、天然溶液和消毒系统,可以提供高达98%的表面活性剂去除率。关于污水毒性,需要更多的研究,因为有限的研究解决了这一差距。此外,表面活性剂和其他污染物对生物和物种的毒性是否会产生增效或拮抗作用尚不清楚。与此同时,对表面活性剂不同工艺转化产物及其毒性的研究成为一个新的研究空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive review of treatment technologies for greywater contaminants: an emphasis on surfactants.

Surfactants are considered a key pollutant in greywater (GW). However, there is no consensus on the best technologies for their removal. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the main lines of GW research. Recent literature on GW characteristics, surfactant characteristics, toxicity and treatment technologies are analyzed along with case studies of GW reuse. The bibliometric analysis shows that 69 % of the studies on GW involve surfactants, and physicochemical technologies predominate with 13.5 % of the total studies. However, the toxicity of surfactants has been scarcely addressed (10 % of the articles). Anionic surfactants represent 60 % of the world production of surfactants. Concentrations in GW range from 7 to 436 mg/L and their toxicity measured as lethal concentration 50 (LC50) varies between 0.027 and 92 mg/L. Physicochemical treatments show a removal efficiency between 22 and 99 % of anionic surfactants, while biological and advanced systems show between 53 and 99 % removal efficiency. Furthermore, combined treatments show removal efficiencies between 78 and 99 %. However, high costs of advanced systems limit their application on a large scale. In this sense, low-cost alternatives such as the use of reused adsorbent materials, natural solutions and disinfection systems could offer up to 98 % surfactant removal. Regarding effluent toxicity, more research is needed, since limited studies address this gap. Moreover, it is unclear whether there will be a synergistic or antagonistic effect on the toxicity caused by surfactants and other pollutants on organisms and species. Along with this, the study of surfactant transformation products by different technologies and their toxicity is presented as a new research gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信