美国乔治亚州西北部Conasauga群碳封存的地球化学评价

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Nora V. Lopez Rivera, Lauren E. Beckingham
{"title":"美国乔治亚州西北部Conasauga群碳封存的地球化学评价","authors":"Nora V. Lopez Rivera,&nbsp;Lauren E. Beckingham","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Sedimentary geological formations are known to be great candidates for geological carbon sequestration. Published studies suggest the southeast of the United States contains many formations suitable for carbon storage. The Cassville 1 Stratigraphic Borehole well could act as a potential carbon reservoir for nearby energy resource facilities in Georgia, United States. Although studies have shown that porous formations are adequate for geological carbon sequestration, it is important to understand possible geochemical reactions between CO<sub>2</sub> and the targeted geological formation before injecting any fluids. In this study, a sandstone sample from the Cassville 1 well is being considered for geological carbon sequestration in the Conasauga Group in Northwest Georgia. The collected sandstone sample, consisting of quartz, K-feldspar, micas, kaolinite, and carbonate minerals such as calcite and dolomite, has a 6% porosity. Leveraging the formation composition and porosity, a one-dimensional continuum reactive transport model was built using CrunchFlow to assess possible geochemical reactions between injected CO<sub>2</sub> and the geological formation. Simulation results show that the carbonate minerals, calcite and dolomite, dissolve during the injection period of 10,000 days, increasing formation porosity from 6% to as much as 30%. The rate and extent of carbonate mineral dissolution and resulting porosity increase are highly sensitive to mineral reactive surface area values. No evidence of mineral precipitation was observed, suggesting that dissolution reactions will control porosity evolution during the CO<sub>2</sub> injection period.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"15 4","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geochemical Assessment for Carbon Sequestration in the Conasauga Group, Northwest Georgia, USA\",\"authors\":\"Nora V. Lopez Rivera,&nbsp;Lauren E. Beckingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ghg.2344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Sedimentary geological formations are known to be great candidates for geological carbon sequestration. Published studies suggest the southeast of the United States contains many formations suitable for carbon storage. The Cassville 1 Stratigraphic Borehole well could act as a potential carbon reservoir for nearby energy resource facilities in Georgia, United States. Although studies have shown that porous formations are adequate for geological carbon sequestration, it is important to understand possible geochemical reactions between CO<sub>2</sub> and the targeted geological formation before injecting any fluids. In this study, a sandstone sample from the Cassville 1 well is being considered for geological carbon sequestration in the Conasauga Group in Northwest Georgia. The collected sandstone sample, consisting of quartz, K-feldspar, micas, kaolinite, and carbonate minerals such as calcite and dolomite, has a 6% porosity. Leveraging the formation composition and porosity, a one-dimensional continuum reactive transport model was built using CrunchFlow to assess possible geochemical reactions between injected CO<sub>2</sub> and the geological formation. Simulation results show that the carbonate minerals, calcite and dolomite, dissolve during the injection period of 10,000 days, increasing formation porosity from 6% to as much as 30%. The rate and extent of carbonate mineral dissolution and resulting porosity increase are highly sensitive to mineral reactive surface area values. No evidence of mineral precipitation was observed, suggesting that dissolution reactions will control porosity evolution during the CO<sub>2</sub> injection period.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"423-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沉积地质构造被认为是地质固碳的重要候选者。已发表的研究表明,美国东南部有许多适合碳储存的地层。casville 1地层钻孔井可以作为美国佐治亚州附近能源设施的潜在碳储层。尽管研究表明多孔地层适合地质固碳,但在注入任何流体之前,了解二氧化碳与目标地质地层之间可能的地球化学反应是很重要的。在这项研究中,来自Cassville 1井的砂岩样本正在考虑用于乔治亚州西北部Conasauga Group的地质碳封存。采集的砂岩样品由石英、钾长石、云母、高岭石和方解石、白云石等碳酸盐矿物组成,孔隙度为6%。利用地层成分和孔隙度,利用CrunchFlow建立了一维连续反应输运模型,以评估注入二氧化碳与地质地层之间可能发生的地球化学反应。模拟结果表明,在1万天的注入过程中,碳酸盐矿物方解石和白云石溶解,使地层孔隙度从6%提高到30%。碳酸盐矿物溶解的速率和程度以及由此产生的孔隙度增加对矿物活性表面积值高度敏感。未观察到矿物沉淀的证据,表明溶解反应将控制CO2注入期间孔隙度的演化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geochemical Assessment for Carbon Sequestration in the Conasauga Group, Northwest Georgia, USA

Geochemical Assessment for Carbon Sequestration in the Conasauga Group, Northwest Georgia, USA

Geochemical Assessment for Carbon Sequestration in the Conasauga Group, Northwest Georgia, USA

Geochemical Assessment for Carbon Sequestration in the Conasauga Group, Northwest Georgia, USA

Sedimentary geological formations are known to be great candidates for geological carbon sequestration. Published studies suggest the southeast of the United States contains many formations suitable for carbon storage. The Cassville 1 Stratigraphic Borehole well could act as a potential carbon reservoir for nearby energy resource facilities in Georgia, United States. Although studies have shown that porous formations are adequate for geological carbon sequestration, it is important to understand possible geochemical reactions between CO2 and the targeted geological formation before injecting any fluids. In this study, a sandstone sample from the Cassville 1 well is being considered for geological carbon sequestration in the Conasauga Group in Northwest Georgia. The collected sandstone sample, consisting of quartz, K-feldspar, micas, kaolinite, and carbonate minerals such as calcite and dolomite, has a 6% porosity. Leveraging the formation composition and porosity, a one-dimensional continuum reactive transport model was built using CrunchFlow to assess possible geochemical reactions between injected CO2 and the geological formation. Simulation results show that the carbonate minerals, calcite and dolomite, dissolve during the injection period of 10,000 days, increasing formation porosity from 6% to as much as 30%. The rate and extent of carbonate mineral dissolution and resulting porosity increase are highly sensitive to mineral reactive surface area values. No evidence of mineral precipitation was observed, suggesting that dissolution reactions will control porosity evolution during the CO2 injection period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信