{"title":"慢读的新见解:阿拉伯语视觉词识别的行为和电生理分析","authors":"Samer Andria, Bahaa Madi-Taraby, Asaid Khateb","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the behavioral and electrophysiological differences between fast and slow readers among Arabic-speaking university students. We employed a classification methodology similar to that used in the rate versus accuracy approach of dyslexia subtyping. Fifty-five native Arabic-speaking university students participated in a lexical decision task involving high-frequency (HF) words, low-frequency (LF) words, and pseudowords (PWs). Behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) data were collected during the task. Participants were categorized as fast or slow readers based on their mean reaction time (RT) across all conditions, with those with RTs below the 65th percentile classified as fast readers and those with RTs above the 75th percentile classified as slow readers. Behaviorally, we observed a frequency effect, with faster RTs for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. At the electrophysiological level, we found a reader effect on the latency of the early ERP components (N170, P2, N2, and P3), with earlier peak latencies for fast readers. Additionally, the P600 component showed a larger amplitude and earlier peak for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. Fast readers exhibited a larger P600 amplitude and an earlier P600 peak for HF words compared to slow readers. These findings provide novel insights into word recognition processes in Arabic-speaking adults, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underlying differences between fast and slow readers. The results are discussed in relation to previous research on word recognition in both typical and dyslexic readers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70223","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Insights Into Slow Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Analyses of Visual Word Recognition in Arabic\",\"authors\":\"Samer Andria, Bahaa Madi-Taraby, Asaid Khateb\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.70223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated the behavioral and electrophysiological differences between fast and slow readers among Arabic-speaking university students. We employed a classification methodology similar to that used in the rate versus accuracy approach of dyslexia subtyping. Fifty-five native Arabic-speaking university students participated in a lexical decision task involving high-frequency (HF) words, low-frequency (LF) words, and pseudowords (PWs). Behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) data were collected during the task. Participants were categorized as fast or slow readers based on their mean reaction time (RT) across all conditions, with those with RTs below the 65th percentile classified as fast readers and those with RTs above the 75th percentile classified as slow readers. Behaviorally, we observed a frequency effect, with faster RTs for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. At the electrophysiological level, we found a reader effect on the latency of the early ERP components (N170, P2, N2, and P3), with earlier peak latencies for fast readers. Additionally, the P600 component showed a larger amplitude and earlier peak for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. Fast readers exhibited a larger P600 amplitude and an earlier P600 peak for HF words compared to slow readers. These findings provide novel insights into word recognition processes in Arabic-speaking adults, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underlying differences between fast and slow readers. The results are discussed in relation to previous research on word recognition in both typical and dyslexic readers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"62 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70223\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
New Insights Into Slow Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Analyses of Visual Word Recognition in Arabic
This study investigated the behavioral and electrophysiological differences between fast and slow readers among Arabic-speaking university students. We employed a classification methodology similar to that used in the rate versus accuracy approach of dyslexia subtyping. Fifty-five native Arabic-speaking university students participated in a lexical decision task involving high-frequency (HF) words, low-frequency (LF) words, and pseudowords (PWs). Behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) data were collected during the task. Participants were categorized as fast or slow readers based on their mean reaction time (RT) across all conditions, with those with RTs below the 65th percentile classified as fast readers and those with RTs above the 75th percentile classified as slow readers. Behaviorally, we observed a frequency effect, with faster RTs for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. At the electrophysiological level, we found a reader effect on the latency of the early ERP components (N170, P2, N2, and P3), with earlier peak latencies for fast readers. Additionally, the P600 component showed a larger amplitude and earlier peak for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. Fast readers exhibited a larger P600 amplitude and an earlier P600 peak for HF words compared to slow readers. These findings provide novel insights into word recognition processes in Arabic-speaking adults, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underlying differences between fast and slow readers. The results are discussed in relation to previous research on word recognition in both typical and dyslexic readers.
期刊介绍:
EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.