慢读的新见解:阿拉伯语视觉词识别的行为和电生理分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Samer Andria, Bahaa Madi-Taraby, Asaid Khateb
{"title":"慢读的新见解:阿拉伯语视觉词识别的行为和电生理分析","authors":"Samer Andria,&nbsp;Bahaa Madi-Taraby,&nbsp;Asaid Khateb","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the behavioral and electrophysiological differences between fast and slow readers among Arabic-speaking university students. We employed a classification methodology similar to that used in the rate versus accuracy approach of dyslexia subtyping. Fifty-five native Arabic-speaking university students participated in a lexical decision task involving high-frequency (HF) words, low-frequency (LF) words, and pseudowords (PWs). Behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) data were collected during the task. Participants were categorized as fast or slow readers based on their mean reaction time (RT) across all conditions, with those with RTs below the 65th percentile classified as fast readers and those with RTs above the 75th percentile classified as slow readers. Behaviorally, we observed a frequency effect, with faster RTs for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. At the electrophysiological level, we found a reader effect on the latency of the early ERP components (N170, P2, N2, and P3), with earlier peak latencies for fast readers. Additionally, the P600 component showed a larger amplitude and earlier peak for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. Fast readers exhibited a larger P600 amplitude and an earlier P600 peak for HF words compared to slow readers. These findings provide novel insights into word recognition processes in Arabic-speaking adults, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underlying differences between fast and slow readers. The results are discussed in relation to previous research on word recognition in both typical and dyslexic readers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70223","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Insights Into Slow Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Analyses of Visual Word Recognition in Arabic\",\"authors\":\"Samer Andria,&nbsp;Bahaa Madi-Taraby,&nbsp;Asaid Khateb\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.70223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated the behavioral and electrophysiological differences between fast and slow readers among Arabic-speaking university students. We employed a classification methodology similar to that used in the rate versus accuracy approach of dyslexia subtyping. Fifty-five native Arabic-speaking university students participated in a lexical decision task involving high-frequency (HF) words, low-frequency (LF) words, and pseudowords (PWs). Behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) data were collected during the task. Participants were categorized as fast or slow readers based on their mean reaction time (RT) across all conditions, with those with RTs below the 65th percentile classified as fast readers and those with RTs above the 75th percentile classified as slow readers. Behaviorally, we observed a frequency effect, with faster RTs for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. At the electrophysiological level, we found a reader effect on the latency of the early ERP components (N170, P2, N2, and P3), with earlier peak latencies for fast readers. Additionally, the P600 component showed a larger amplitude and earlier peak for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. Fast readers exhibited a larger P600 amplitude and an earlier P600 peak for HF words compared to slow readers. These findings provide novel insights into word recognition processes in Arabic-speaking adults, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underlying differences between fast and slow readers. The results are discussed in relation to previous research on word recognition in both typical and dyslexic readers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"62 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70223\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了阿拉伯语大学生快速阅读和慢速阅读的行为和电生理差异。我们采用了一种分类方法,类似于在阅读障碍亚型分型的比率与准确性方法中使用的方法。55名母语为阿拉伯语的大学生参与了一项涉及高频词、低频词和假词的词汇决策任务。在任务期间收集行为和事件相关电位(erp)数据。参与者根据他们在所有条件下的平均反应时间(RT)被分为快速或缓慢的读者,RTs低于第65百分位的人被归类为快速读者,RTs高于第75百分位的人被归类为缓慢读者。在行为上,我们观察到频率效应,高频词的rt比低频词和PWs更快。在电生理水平上,我们发现阅读器对早期ERP组件(N170、P2、N2和P3)的延迟有影响,快速阅读器的延迟峰更早。高频词的P600分量比低频词和低频词的P600分量振幅更大,峰值更早。与慢速阅读者相比,快速阅读者对高频词的P600振幅更大,峰值更早。这些发现为研究说阿拉伯语的成年人的单词识别过程提供了新的见解,揭示了快速和慢速读者之间潜在差异的神经机制。本文的研究结果与以往关于典型阅读困难者和诵读困难者词汇识别的研究结果相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

New Insights Into Slow Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Analyses of Visual Word Recognition in Arabic

New Insights Into Slow Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Analyses of Visual Word Recognition in Arabic

This study investigated the behavioral and electrophysiological differences between fast and slow readers among Arabic-speaking university students. We employed a classification methodology similar to that used in the rate versus accuracy approach of dyslexia subtyping. Fifty-five native Arabic-speaking university students participated in a lexical decision task involving high-frequency (HF) words, low-frequency (LF) words, and pseudowords (PWs). Behavioral and event-related potentials (ERPs) data were collected during the task. Participants were categorized as fast or slow readers based on their mean reaction time (RT) across all conditions, with those with RTs below the 65th percentile classified as fast readers and those with RTs above the 75th percentile classified as slow readers. Behaviorally, we observed a frequency effect, with faster RTs for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. At the electrophysiological level, we found a reader effect on the latency of the early ERP components (N170, P2, N2, and P3), with earlier peak latencies for fast readers. Additionally, the P600 component showed a larger amplitude and earlier peak for HF words compared to LF words and PWs. Fast readers exhibited a larger P600 amplitude and an earlier P600 peak for HF words compared to slow readers. These findings provide novel insights into word recognition processes in Arabic-speaking adults, shedding light on the neural mechanisms underlying differences between fast and slow readers. The results are discussed in relation to previous research on word recognition in both typical and dyslexic readers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信