Maziyar Nazemi, Shahin E. Dashtgard, Francyne Bochi do Amarante, Hassan Hassanzadeh, Andrew D. La Croix
{"title":"加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省低陆平原(LMBC)深层盐水含水层二氧化碳储存地质筛选","authors":"Maziyar Nazemi, Shahin E. Dashtgard, Francyne Bochi do Amarante, Hassan Hassanzadeh, Andrew D. La Croix","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs are prime candidates for CO<sub>2</sub> storage, but feasibility assessments remain limited in regions with little oil and gas activity, such as the Lower Mainland of British Columbia (LMBC), Canada. This study evaluates the CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential of the Georgia Basin strata beneath the LMBC, focusing on three intervals (Nanaimo Group, Huntingdon Formation, and Boundary Bay Formation) in Western, Central, and Eastern LMBC. Eastern LMBC holds limited potential for CO<sub>2</sub> storage due to both the shallow depth of strata in that region and the high geological uncertainty resulting from limited subsurface data. The Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group across the entire LMBC is unsuitable for CO<sub>2</sub> injection because it has very poor reservoir quality (generally <1 mD permeability and <8% porosity). In contrast, the Paleogene Huntingdon Formation in Western and Central LMBC contains thick successions of reservoir-quality rock (average thickness: 110 m, porosity: 15%), though its low permeability (≥10 mD) may restrict injection rates. Its estimated CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity is ∼400 Mt, making it a secondary target. The Neogene Boundary Bay Formation, also in Western and Central LMBC, offers the most favorable conditions, with higher permeability (13–67 mD), porosity (18%–21%), and thick reservoir intervals (up to 155 m). It has an estimated CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity of ∼430 Mt. With low fault density and minimal wellbore leakage risks, the Boundary Bay Formation and then the Huntingdon Formation below Western and Central LMBC are recommended as the primary targets for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"15 4","pages":"432-448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ghg.2345","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geological Screening for CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers in the Lower Mainland British Columbia (LMBC), Canada\",\"authors\":\"Maziyar Nazemi, Shahin E. Dashtgard, Francyne Bochi do Amarante, Hassan Hassanzadeh, Andrew D. La Croix\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ghg.2345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Deep saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs are prime candidates for CO<sub>2</sub> storage, but feasibility assessments remain limited in regions with little oil and gas activity, such as the Lower Mainland of British Columbia (LMBC), Canada. This study evaluates the CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential of the Georgia Basin strata beneath the LMBC, focusing on three intervals (Nanaimo Group, Huntingdon Formation, and Boundary Bay Formation) in Western, Central, and Eastern LMBC. Eastern LMBC holds limited potential for CO<sub>2</sub> storage due to both the shallow depth of strata in that region and the high geological uncertainty resulting from limited subsurface data. The Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group across the entire LMBC is unsuitable for CO<sub>2</sub> injection because it has very poor reservoir quality (generally <1 mD permeability and <8% porosity). In contrast, the Paleogene Huntingdon Formation in Western and Central LMBC contains thick successions of reservoir-quality rock (average thickness: 110 m, porosity: 15%), though its low permeability (≥10 mD) may restrict injection rates. Its estimated CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity is ∼400 Mt, making it a secondary target. The Neogene Boundary Bay Formation, also in Western and Central LMBC, offers the most favorable conditions, with higher permeability (13–67 mD), porosity (18%–21%), and thick reservoir intervals (up to 155 m). It has an estimated CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity of ∼430 Mt. With low fault density and minimal wellbore leakage risks, the Boundary Bay Formation and then the Huntingdon Formation below Western and Central LMBC are recommended as the primary targets for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in the region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"432-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ghg.2345\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geological Screening for CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers in the Lower Mainland British Columbia (LMBC), Canada
Deep saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs are prime candidates for CO2 storage, but feasibility assessments remain limited in regions with little oil and gas activity, such as the Lower Mainland of British Columbia (LMBC), Canada. This study evaluates the CO2 storage potential of the Georgia Basin strata beneath the LMBC, focusing on three intervals (Nanaimo Group, Huntingdon Formation, and Boundary Bay Formation) in Western, Central, and Eastern LMBC. Eastern LMBC holds limited potential for CO2 storage due to both the shallow depth of strata in that region and the high geological uncertainty resulting from limited subsurface data. The Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group across the entire LMBC is unsuitable for CO2 injection because it has very poor reservoir quality (generally <1 mD permeability and <8% porosity). In contrast, the Paleogene Huntingdon Formation in Western and Central LMBC contains thick successions of reservoir-quality rock (average thickness: 110 m, porosity: 15%), though its low permeability (≥10 mD) may restrict injection rates. Its estimated CO2 storage capacity is ∼400 Mt, making it a secondary target. The Neogene Boundary Bay Formation, also in Western and Central LMBC, offers the most favorable conditions, with higher permeability (13–67 mD), porosity (18%–21%), and thick reservoir intervals (up to 155 m). It has an estimated CO2 storage capacity of ∼430 Mt. With low fault density and minimal wellbore leakage risks, the Boundary Bay Formation and then the Huntingdon Formation below Western and Central LMBC are recommended as the primary targets for CO2 sequestration in the region.
期刊介绍:
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies.
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd