补偿性消费:基于理论-情境-特征-方法论框架的回顾与研究议程

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Tuan (Todd) Cao, Catherine Prentice, Qingxia (Jenny) Wang, Hoang Sinh Nguyen
{"title":"补偿性消费:基于理论-情境-特征-方法论框架的回顾与研究议程","authors":"Tuan (Todd) Cao,&nbsp;Catherine Prentice,&nbsp;Qingxia (Jenny) Wang,&nbsp;Hoang Sinh Nguyen","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Compensatory consumption refers to consumer behaviors driven by psychological motives to address self-discrepancies, emotional distress, or identity threats. Although scholarly interest in this topic has grown, a comprehensive synthesis of its theoretical foundations, research contexts, consumer characteristics, and methodological approaches remains limited. This study presents a systematic literature review of 105 peer-reviewed articles published in Chartered Association of Business Schools (ABS)-ranked journals, following PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, Methodology) framework. Articles were initially retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Emerald Insight, but only those published in ABS-ranked journals meeting predefined quality criteria were included. The findings show that compensatory consumption is predominantly explained by self-discrepancy theory, symbolic self-completion theory, and compensatory consumption theory. A model is developed to map the relationships among antecedents, mediators, outcomes, and moderators. The review also identifies a shift from materialistic and status-driven behaviors toward symbolic, ethical, and experiential consumption. It contributes to theory by integrating fragmented perspectives and identifying emerging constructs. This review also provides managerial guidance on ethical positioning, symbolic value creation, and inclusive branding, and outlines future research directions across underexplored contexts, theoretical lenses, and methodological approaches.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensatory Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda Using the Theory-Context-Characteristics-Methodology Framework\",\"authors\":\"Tuan (Todd) Cao,&nbsp;Catherine Prentice,&nbsp;Qingxia (Jenny) Wang,&nbsp;Hoang Sinh Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Compensatory consumption refers to consumer behaviors driven by psychological motives to address self-discrepancies, emotional distress, or identity threats. Although scholarly interest in this topic has grown, a comprehensive synthesis of its theoretical foundations, research contexts, consumer characteristics, and methodological approaches remains limited. This study presents a systematic literature review of 105 peer-reviewed articles published in Chartered Association of Business Schools (ABS)-ranked journals, following PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, Methodology) framework. Articles were initially retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Emerald Insight, but only those published in ABS-ranked journals meeting predefined quality criteria were included. The findings show that compensatory consumption is predominantly explained by self-discrepancy theory, symbolic self-completion theory, and compensatory consumption theory. A model is developed to map the relationships among antecedents, mediators, outcomes, and moderators. The review also identifies a shift from materialistic and status-driven behaviors toward symbolic, ethical, and experiential consumption. It contributes to theory by integrating fragmented perspectives and identifying emerging constructs. This review also provides managerial guidance on ethical positioning, symbolic value creation, and inclusive branding, and outlines future research directions across underexplored contexts, theoretical lenses, and methodological approaches.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

补偿性消费是指由心理动机驱动的消费者行为,以解决自我差异、情绪困扰或身份威胁。尽管对这一主题的学术兴趣有所增长,但对其理论基础、研究背景、消费者特征和方法方法的全面综合仍然有限。本研究对发表在特许商学院协会(ABS)排名期刊上的105篇同行评议文章进行了系统的文献综述,遵循PRISMA 2020(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,并使用TCCM(理论、背景、特征、方法)框架。文章最初从Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost和Emerald Insight中检索,但只包括那些发表在abs排名期刊上的文章,符合预定义的质量标准。研究结果表明,补偿消费主要由自我差异理论、符号自我完成理论和补偿消费理论解释。开发了一个模型来映射前件、中介、结果和中介之间的关系。该报告还指出,从物质主义和地位驱动的行为向象征性、伦理性和体验性消费的转变。它通过整合支离破碎的观点和识别新兴的结构来促进理论。这篇综述还为伦理定位、符号价值创造和包容性品牌提供了管理指导,并概述了未来在未被探索的背景、理论视角和方法方法方面的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compensatory Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda Using the Theory-Context-Characteristics-Methodology Framework

Compensatory consumption refers to consumer behaviors driven by psychological motives to address self-discrepancies, emotional distress, or identity threats. Although scholarly interest in this topic has grown, a comprehensive synthesis of its theoretical foundations, research contexts, consumer characteristics, and methodological approaches remains limited. This study presents a systematic literature review of 105 peer-reviewed articles published in Chartered Association of Business Schools (ABS)-ranked journals, following PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, Methodology) framework. Articles were initially retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Emerald Insight, but only those published in ABS-ranked journals meeting predefined quality criteria were included. The findings show that compensatory consumption is predominantly explained by self-discrepancy theory, symbolic self-completion theory, and compensatory consumption theory. A model is developed to map the relationships among antecedents, mediators, outcomes, and moderators. The review also identifies a shift from materialistic and status-driven behaviors toward symbolic, ethical, and experiential consumption. It contributes to theory by integrating fragmented perspectives and identifying emerging constructs. This review also provides managerial guidance on ethical positioning, symbolic value creation, and inclusive branding, and outlines future research directions across underexplored contexts, theoretical lenses, and methodological approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信