通过简单的例子教授可重组的主题

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Huang Ham, Bonan Zhao, Thomas L. Griffiths, Natalia Vélez
{"title":"通过简单的例子教授可重组的主题","authors":"Huang Ham,&nbsp;Bonan Zhao,&nbsp;Thomas L. Griffiths,&nbsp;Natalia Vélez","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A hallmark of effective teaching is that it grants learners not just a collection of facts about the world, but also a toolkit of abstractions that can be applied to solve new problems. How do humans teach abstractions from examples? Here, we applied Bayesian models of pedagogy to a necklace-building task where teachers create necklaces to teach a learner “motifs” that can be flexibly recombined to create new necklaces. In Experiment 1 (<i>N</i> = 151), we find that human teachers produce necklaces that are simpler (i.e., have lower algorithmic complexity) than would be expected by chance, as indexed by a model that samples uniformly from all necklaces that contain the target motifs. This tendency to select simpler examples is captured by a pedagogical sampling model that tries to maximize the learner's belief in the true motifs by prioritizing examples that have fewer alternative interpretations. In Experiment 2 (<i>N</i> = 295), we find that simplicity is beneficial. Human learners recover the underlying motifs better when teachers produce simpler sequences, as predicted by the pedagogical sampling model. However, humans learn best from human teachers rather than from model-generated examples, which suggests that human teachers have additional expectations about how learners will interpret examples that are not captured by standard models of teaching. Our work provides a principled framework to understand when and why teachers use simple examples to convey abstract knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Recombinable Motifs Through Simple Examples\",\"authors\":\"Huang Ham,&nbsp;Bonan Zhao,&nbsp;Thomas L. Griffiths,&nbsp;Natalia Vélez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cogs.70103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A hallmark of effective teaching is that it grants learners not just a collection of facts about the world, but also a toolkit of abstractions that can be applied to solve new problems. How do humans teach abstractions from examples? Here, we applied Bayesian models of pedagogy to a necklace-building task where teachers create necklaces to teach a learner “motifs” that can be flexibly recombined to create new necklaces. In Experiment 1 (<i>N</i> = 151), we find that human teachers produce necklaces that are simpler (i.e., have lower algorithmic complexity) than would be expected by chance, as indexed by a model that samples uniformly from all necklaces that contain the target motifs. This tendency to select simpler examples is captured by a pedagogical sampling model that tries to maximize the learner's belief in the true motifs by prioritizing examples that have fewer alternative interpretations. In Experiment 2 (<i>N</i> = 295), we find that simplicity is beneficial. Human learners recover the underlying motifs better when teachers produce simpler sequences, as predicted by the pedagogical sampling model. However, humans learn best from human teachers rather than from model-generated examples, which suggests that human teachers have additional expectations about how learners will interpret examples that are not captured by standard models of teaching. Our work provides a principled framework to understand when and why teachers use simple examples to convey abstract knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":\"49 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效教学的一个标志是,它不仅给学习者提供了关于世界的事实的集合,而且还提供了一个可以用于解决新问题的抽象工具包。人类是如何从例子中教授抽象概念的?在这里,我们将贝叶斯教学法模型应用于项链制作任务,教师制作项链来教授学习者“图案”,这些图案可以灵活地重新组合以制作新的项链。在实验1 (N = 151)中,我们发现人类教师生产的项链比偶然期望的更简单(即,具有更低的算法复杂性),正如一个从包含目标图案的所有项链中均匀采样的模型所索引的那样。这种选择简单例子的倾向被教学抽样模型所捕捉,该模型试图通过优先选择具有较少替代解释的例子来最大化学习者对真实主题的信念。在实验2 (N = 295)中,我们发现简单是有益的。正如教学抽样模型所预测的那样,当教师产生更简单的序列时,人类学习者能更好地恢复潜在的母题。然而,人类从人类教师那里学得最好,而不是从模型生成的例子中,这表明人类教师对学习者如何解释标准教学模型没有捕捉到的例子有额外的期望。我们的工作提供了一个原则性的框架来理解教师何时以及为什么使用简单的例子来传达抽象的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Teaching Recombinable Motifs Through Simple Examples

Teaching Recombinable Motifs Through Simple Examples

A hallmark of effective teaching is that it grants learners not just a collection of facts about the world, but also a toolkit of abstractions that can be applied to solve new problems. How do humans teach abstractions from examples? Here, we applied Bayesian models of pedagogy to a necklace-building task where teachers create necklaces to teach a learner “motifs” that can be flexibly recombined to create new necklaces. In Experiment 1 (N = 151), we find that human teachers produce necklaces that are simpler (i.e., have lower algorithmic complexity) than would be expected by chance, as indexed by a model that samples uniformly from all necklaces that contain the target motifs. This tendency to select simpler examples is captured by a pedagogical sampling model that tries to maximize the learner's belief in the true motifs by prioritizing examples that have fewer alternative interpretations. In Experiment 2 (N = 295), we find that simplicity is beneficial. Human learners recover the underlying motifs better when teachers produce simpler sequences, as predicted by the pedagogical sampling model. However, humans learn best from human teachers rather than from model-generated examples, which suggests that human teachers have additional expectations about how learners will interpret examples that are not captured by standard models of teaching. Our work provides a principled framework to understand when and why teachers use simple examples to convey abstract knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信