Jonghyuk Lee, Sujong Jeong, Young Jun Kim, Soona Roh, Jiyeon Kim, Hyungah Jin
{"title":"多卫星测量协同填补全球XCO2的空白","authors":"Jonghyuk Lee, Sujong Jeong, Young Jun Kim, Soona Roh, Jiyeon Kim, Hyungah Jin","doi":"10.1029/2024JD042809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations is essential for understanding the global carbon cycle. Satellite remote sensing enables global-scale CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring, providing column-averaged dry air mole fractions of CO<sub>2</sub> (XCO<sub>2</sub>). Current missions such as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) series provide high-quality XCO<sub>2</sub> but have many observation gaps because of narrow swath widths or cloud interference. To address this, we first propose a machine learning (ML) approach to estimate daily XCO<sub>2</sub> (ML XCO<sub>2</sub>) at a 0.25<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${}^{\\circ}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> resolution using OCO-2, Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument, and ERA5 reanalysis data from May 2018 to December 2023. Validation against the Total Carbon Column Observing Network measurements shows high agreement, with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.95, a root mean square error of 1.05 ppm, and a mean absolute error of 0.78 ppm. The spatiotemporal variations in ML XCO<sub>2</sub> are generally consistent with OCO-2, GOSAT, and the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) XCO<sub>2</sub>. Notably, during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, ML XCO<sub>2</sub> estimates were more consistent with OCO-2 and GOSAT XCO<sub>2</sub> than CAMS XCO<sub>2</sub>, which was overestimated owing to unadjusted COVID-19-related CO<sub>2</sub> emission reductions. The annual mean CO<sub>2</sub> growth rates from ML XCO<sub>2</sub> (2.065–2.735 ppm/year, 2019–2023) also agree with estimates from OCO-2 and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration surface measurements, indicating the robustness of our approach. Our study demonstrates that the synergy between multiple-satellite measurements enhances the spatial coverage of XCO<sub>2</sub> and improves our understanding of the global carbon cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD042809","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergy of Multiple-Satellite Measurements to Fill the Gap of Global XCO2\",\"authors\":\"Jonghyuk Lee, Sujong Jeong, Young Jun Kim, Soona Roh, Jiyeon Kim, Hyungah Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD042809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations is essential for understanding the global carbon cycle. Satellite remote sensing enables global-scale CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring, providing column-averaged dry air mole fractions of CO<sub>2</sub> (XCO<sub>2</sub>). Current missions such as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) series provide high-quality XCO<sub>2</sub> but have many observation gaps because of narrow swath widths or cloud interference. To address this, we first propose a machine learning (ML) approach to estimate daily XCO<sub>2</sub> (ML XCO<sub>2</sub>) at a 0.25<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${}^{\\\\circ}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> resolution using OCO-2, Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument, and ERA5 reanalysis data from May 2018 to December 2023. Validation against the Total Carbon Column Observing Network measurements shows high agreement, with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.95, a root mean square error of 1.05 ppm, and a mean absolute error of 0.78 ppm. The spatiotemporal variations in ML XCO<sub>2</sub> are generally consistent with OCO-2, GOSAT, and the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) XCO<sub>2</sub>. Notably, during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, ML XCO<sub>2</sub> estimates were more consistent with OCO-2 and GOSAT XCO<sub>2</sub> than CAMS XCO<sub>2</sub>, which was overestimated owing to unadjusted COVID-19-related CO<sub>2</sub> emission reductions. The annual mean CO<sub>2</sub> growth rates from ML XCO<sub>2</sub> (2.065–2.735 ppm/year, 2019–2023) also agree with estimates from OCO-2 and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration surface measurements, indicating the robustness of our approach. Our study demonstrates that the synergy between multiple-satellite measurements enhances the spatial coverage of XCO<sub>2</sub> and improves our understanding of the global carbon cycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"130 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD042809\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042809\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synergy of Multiple-Satellite Measurements to Fill the Gap of Global XCO2
Accurate monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations is essential for understanding the global carbon cycle. Satellite remote sensing enables global-scale CO2 monitoring, providing column-averaged dry air mole fractions of CO2 (XCO2). Current missions such as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) series provide high-quality XCO2 but have many observation gaps because of narrow swath widths or cloud interference. To address this, we first propose a machine learning (ML) approach to estimate daily XCO2 (ML XCO2) at a 0.25 resolution using OCO-2, Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument, and ERA5 reanalysis data from May 2018 to December 2023. Validation against the Total Carbon Column Observing Network measurements shows high agreement, with an R2 of 0.95, a root mean square error of 1.05 ppm, and a mean absolute error of 0.78 ppm. The spatiotemporal variations in ML XCO2 are generally consistent with OCO-2, GOSAT, and the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) XCO2. Notably, during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, ML XCO2 estimates were more consistent with OCO-2 and GOSAT XCO2 than CAMS XCO2, which was overestimated owing to unadjusted COVID-19-related CO2 emission reductions. The annual mean CO2 growth rates from ML XCO2 (2.065–2.735 ppm/year, 2019–2023) also agree with estimates from OCO-2 and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration surface measurements, indicating the robustness of our approach. Our study demonstrates that the synergy between multiple-satellite measurements enhances the spatial coverage of XCO2 and improves our understanding of the global carbon cycle.
期刊介绍:
JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.