{"title":"纽约州北部德拉姆堡森林组成中的土著和欧美土地利用遗产:物种分布模型在局部范围内检测到什么?","authors":"Stephen J. Tulowiecki","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>How consequential is past land use in shaping forest compositional patterns as inferred through fine resolution, local-extent species distribution models (SDMs)? Do legacies of Indigenous and European-American land-use regimes interact and influence past and present forest composition? Do proxies of past land use improve SDMs?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Fort Drum, northern New York State, US (434 km<sup>2</sup>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxa</h3>\n \n <p>27 tree taxa across 18 genera: <i>Acer, Amelanchier, Betula, Carpinus, Carya, Fagus, Fraxinus, Juglans, Ostrya, Pinus, Populus, Prunus, Quercus, Salix, Thuja, Tilia, Tsuga</i> and <i>Ulmus.</i>\n </p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Development of Species Distribution Models (SDMs) of Tree Taxa Circa 2000 Recorded in a Forest Inventory (<i>n</i> = 10,043 Plots), and Analysis of Original Land Survey Records Circa 1800 in Conjunction with Archaeological Data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>‘Distance to nearest circa 1950 forest’ was the most important predictor in SDMs of circa 2000 tree taxon distributions, more so than soil conditions such as soil moisture and pH. This predictor increased the predictive performance of SDMs of distributions circa 2000 (e.g., mean increase in AUC = 0.025). SDMs did not suggest that past Indigenous land-use legacies extensively existed within taxon distributions, but they detected some relationships between archaeological sensitivity, oak and pine circa 1800 and 2000.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Measures of land use or past land cover improve the predictive power of fine resolution SDMs, and interacting legacies of differing land-use regimes may shape current species distributions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous and European-American Land-Use Legacies in Forest Composition, Fort Drum, Northern New York State: What Do Species Distribution Models Detect Across a Local Extent?\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J. Tulowiecki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>How consequential is past land use in shaping forest compositional patterns as inferred through fine resolution, local-extent species distribution models (SDMs)? Do legacies of Indigenous and European-American land-use regimes interact and influence past and present forest composition? Do proxies of past land use improve SDMs?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fort Drum, northern New York State, US (434 km<sup>2</sup>).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxa</h3>\\n \\n <p>27 tree taxa across 18 genera: <i>Acer, Amelanchier, Betula, Carpinus, Carya, Fagus, Fraxinus, Juglans, Ostrya, Pinus, Populus, Prunus, Quercus, Salix, Thuja, Tilia, Tsuga</i> and <i>Ulmus.</i>\\n </p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Development of Species Distribution Models (SDMs) of Tree Taxa Circa 2000 Recorded in a Forest Inventory (<i>n</i> = 10,043 Plots), and Analysis of Original Land Survey Records Circa 1800 in Conjunction with Archaeological Data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>‘Distance to nearest circa 1950 forest’ was the most important predictor in SDMs of circa 2000 tree taxon distributions, more so than soil conditions such as soil moisture and pH. This predictor increased the predictive performance of SDMs of distributions circa 2000 (e.g., mean increase in AUC = 0.025). SDMs did not suggest that past Indigenous land-use legacies extensively existed within taxon distributions, but they detected some relationships between archaeological sensitivity, oak and pine circa 1800 and 2000.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Measures of land use or past land cover improve the predictive power of fine resolution SDMs, and interacting legacies of differing land-use regimes may shape current species distributions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15180\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indigenous and European-American Land-Use Legacies in Forest Composition, Fort Drum, Northern New York State: What Do Species Distribution Models Detect Across a Local Extent?
Aim
How consequential is past land use in shaping forest compositional patterns as inferred through fine resolution, local-extent species distribution models (SDMs)? Do legacies of Indigenous and European-American land-use regimes interact and influence past and present forest composition? Do proxies of past land use improve SDMs?
Location
Fort Drum, northern New York State, US (434 km2).
Taxa
27 tree taxa across 18 genera: Acer, Amelanchier, Betula, Carpinus, Carya, Fagus, Fraxinus, Juglans, Ostrya, Pinus, Populus, Prunus, Quercus, Salix, Thuja, Tilia, Tsuga and Ulmus.
Methods
Development of Species Distribution Models (SDMs) of Tree Taxa Circa 2000 Recorded in a Forest Inventory (n = 10,043 Plots), and Analysis of Original Land Survey Records Circa 1800 in Conjunction with Archaeological Data.
Results
‘Distance to nearest circa 1950 forest’ was the most important predictor in SDMs of circa 2000 tree taxon distributions, more so than soil conditions such as soil moisture and pH. This predictor increased the predictive performance of SDMs of distributions circa 2000 (e.g., mean increase in AUC = 0.025). SDMs did not suggest that past Indigenous land-use legacies extensively existed within taxon distributions, but they detected some relationships between archaeological sensitivity, oak and pine circa 1800 and 2000.
Main Conclusions
Measures of land use or past land cover improve the predictive power of fine resolution SDMs, and interacting legacies of differing land-use regimes may shape current species distributions.
期刊介绍:
Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.