纽约州北部德拉姆堡森林组成中的土著和欧美土地利用遗产:物种分布模型在局部范围内检测到什么?

IF 3.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Stephen J. Tulowiecki
{"title":"纽约州北部德拉姆堡森林组成中的土著和欧美土地利用遗产:物种分布模型在局部范围内检测到什么?","authors":"Stephen J. Tulowiecki","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>How consequential is past land use in shaping forest compositional patterns as inferred through fine resolution, local-extent species distribution models (SDMs)? Do legacies of Indigenous and European-American land-use regimes interact and influence past and present forest composition? Do proxies of past land use improve SDMs?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Fort Drum, northern New York State, US (434 km<sup>2</sup>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxa</h3>\n \n <p>27 tree taxa across 18 genera: <i>Acer, Amelanchier, Betula, Carpinus, Carya, Fagus, Fraxinus, Juglans, Ostrya, Pinus, Populus, Prunus, Quercus, Salix, Thuja, Tilia, Tsuga</i> and <i>Ulmus.</i>\n </p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Development of Species Distribution Models (SDMs) of Tree Taxa Circa 2000 Recorded in a Forest Inventory (<i>n</i> = 10,043 Plots), and Analysis of Original Land Survey Records Circa 1800 in Conjunction with Archaeological Data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>‘Distance to nearest circa 1950 forest’ was the most important predictor in SDMs of circa 2000 tree taxon distributions, more so than soil conditions such as soil moisture and pH. This predictor increased the predictive performance of SDMs of distributions circa 2000 (e.g., mean increase in AUC = 0.025). SDMs did not suggest that past Indigenous land-use legacies extensively existed within taxon distributions, but they detected some relationships between archaeological sensitivity, oak and pine circa 1800 and 2000.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Measures of land use or past land cover improve the predictive power of fine resolution SDMs, and interacting legacies of differing land-use regimes may shape current species distributions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous and European-American Land-Use Legacies in Forest Composition, Fort Drum, Northern New York State: What Do Species Distribution Models Detect Across a Local Extent?\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J. Tulowiecki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>How consequential is past land use in shaping forest compositional patterns as inferred through fine resolution, local-extent species distribution models (SDMs)? Do legacies of Indigenous and European-American land-use regimes interact and influence past and present forest composition? Do proxies of past land use improve SDMs?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fort Drum, northern New York State, US (434 km<sup>2</sup>).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxa</h3>\\n \\n <p>27 tree taxa across 18 genera: <i>Acer, Amelanchier, Betula, Carpinus, Carya, Fagus, Fraxinus, Juglans, Ostrya, Pinus, Populus, Prunus, Quercus, Salix, Thuja, Tilia, Tsuga</i> and <i>Ulmus.</i>\\n </p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Development of Species Distribution Models (SDMs) of Tree Taxa Circa 2000 Recorded in a Forest Inventory (<i>n</i> = 10,043 Plots), and Analysis of Original Land Survey Records Circa 1800 in Conjunction with Archaeological Data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>‘Distance to nearest circa 1950 forest’ was the most important predictor in SDMs of circa 2000 tree taxon distributions, more so than soil conditions such as soil moisture and pH. This predictor increased the predictive performance of SDMs of distributions circa 2000 (e.g., mean increase in AUC = 0.025). SDMs did not suggest that past Indigenous land-use legacies extensively existed within taxon distributions, but they detected some relationships between archaeological sensitivity, oak and pine circa 1800 and 2000.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Measures of land use or past land cover improve the predictive power of fine resolution SDMs, and interacting legacies of differing land-use regimes may shape current species distributions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15180\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过精细分辨率、局域物种分布模型(SDMs)推断,过去的土地利用对塑造森林组成格局的影响有多大?土著和欧美土地利用制度的遗产是否相互作用并影响过去和现在的森林组成?过去土地利用的代理是否能改善sdm ?地点:美国纽约州北部德拉姆堡(434平方公里)。27个乔木分类群,跨越18个属:槭、白桦、红木、山核桃、Fagus、Fraxinus、Juglans、Ostrya、Pinus、Populus、Prunus、Quercus、Salix、Thuja、Tilia、Tsuga和榆木。方法建立森林资源清查(10043样地)2000年前后树木类群的物种分布模型,并结合考古资料对1800年前后的原始土地调查记录进行分析。结果“到最近的1950年前后森林的距离”是2000年前后树木分类群分布的sdm最重要的预测因子,比土壤条件(如土壤湿度和ph)更重要。该预测因子提高了2000年前后分布的sdm的预测性能(例如,AUC平均增加= 0.025)。SDMs并未表明过去的土著土地利用遗产在分类群分布中广泛存在,但他们发现了1800年至2000年间考古敏感性与橡树和松树之间的一些关系。土地利用或过去土地覆盖的测量提高了精细分辨率sdm的预测能力,不同土地利用制度的相互作用遗产可能会塑造当前的物种分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indigenous and European-American Land-Use Legacies in Forest Composition, Fort Drum, Northern New York State: What Do Species Distribution Models Detect Across a Local Extent?

Aim

How consequential is past land use in shaping forest compositional patterns as inferred through fine resolution, local-extent species distribution models (SDMs)? Do legacies of Indigenous and European-American land-use regimes interact and influence past and present forest composition? Do proxies of past land use improve SDMs?

Location

Fort Drum, northern New York State, US (434 km2).

Taxa

27 tree taxa across 18 genera: Acer, Amelanchier, Betula, Carpinus, Carya, Fagus, Fraxinus, Juglans, Ostrya, Pinus, Populus, Prunus, Quercus, Salix, Thuja, Tilia, Tsuga and Ulmus.

Methods

Development of Species Distribution Models (SDMs) of Tree Taxa Circa 2000 Recorded in a Forest Inventory (n = 10,043 Plots), and Analysis of Original Land Survey Records Circa 1800 in Conjunction with Archaeological Data.

Results

‘Distance to nearest circa 1950 forest’ was the most important predictor in SDMs of circa 2000 tree taxon distributions, more so than soil conditions such as soil moisture and pH. This predictor increased the predictive performance of SDMs of distributions circa 2000 (e.g., mean increase in AUC = 0.025). SDMs did not suggest that past Indigenous land-use legacies extensively existed within taxon distributions, but they detected some relationships between archaeological sensitivity, oak and pine circa 1800 and 2000.

Main Conclusions

Measures of land use or past land cover improve the predictive power of fine resolution SDMs, and interacting legacies of differing land-use regimes may shape current species distributions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biogeography
Journal of Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信