大木结构和钢筋混凝土建筑在抗震性能、LCA和成本方面的比较

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Erkan Okay Mutlu, Kadir Can Şener, Özgür Anıl
{"title":"大木结构和钢筋混凝土建筑在抗震性能、LCA和成本方面的比较","authors":"Erkan Okay Mutlu,&nbsp;Kadir Can Şener,&nbsp;Özgür Anıl","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 10","pages":"4221 - 4253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of mass-timber and RC buildings in terms of seismic performance, LCA, and cost in Türkiye\",\"authors\":\"Erkan Okay Mutlu,&nbsp;Kadir Can Şener,&nbsp;Özgür Anıl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 10\",\"pages\":\"4221 - 4253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023年2月6日发生在基耶省kahramanmaraku的两次毁灭性地震,突出了许多现有钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑的抗震性能差,迫切需要快速、大规模的重建。本研究评估了在土耳其地震区使用现代木结构体系替代传统RC结构的中高层住宅建筑的可行性。一栋七层的住宅建筑被设计成两种形式——一种是标准的RC剪力墙结构,另一种是等效的大质量木材(交叉层压木材,CLT)结构——并比较了它们的抗震性能、环境影响和建筑成本。根据适用的抗震设计标准,对两种设计进行了非线性静力分析和反应谱分析。通过从摇篮到闸门的生命周期评估(LCA)来量化隐含碳和能源,并使用2023年当地材料价格进行成本分析。CLT建筑达到了足够的抗震性能,其基本周期大约是RC建筑的两倍,基础剪力大约是RC建筑的三分之一。虽然CLT结构经历了较大的横向漂移,但这些漂移仍在可用范围内。在可持续性方面,与钢筋混凝土设计相比,大量木材设计对环境的影响显著降低——大约减少了一个数量级的隐含碳和能源。主要的权衡是经济上的:由于目前的材料价格和供应限制,大木结构建筑的估计建造成本大约是钢筋混凝土建筑的5-6倍。总体而言,研究结果表明,如果成本和材料供应问题可以通过未来的政策和市场发展得到解决,那么大质量木材是一种结构上可行且对环境有利的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of mass-timber and RC buildings in terms of seismic performance, LCA, and cost in Türkiye

The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信