{"title":"大木结构和钢筋混凝土建筑在抗震性能、LCA和成本方面的比较","authors":"Erkan Okay Mutlu, Kadir Can Şener, Özgür Anıl","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 10","pages":"4221 - 4253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of mass-timber and RC buildings in terms of seismic performance, LCA, and cost in Türkiye\",\"authors\":\"Erkan Okay Mutlu, Kadir Can Şener, Özgür Anıl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 10\",\"pages\":\"4221 - 4253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02201-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of mass-timber and RC buildings in terms of seismic performance, LCA, and cost in Türkiye
The two devastating earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, highlighted the poor seismic performance of many existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings and created an urgent need for rapid, large-scale reconstruction. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a modern mass-timber structural system as an alternative to conventional RC construction for mid-rise residential buildings in Turkish seismic regions. A seven-story residential building was designed in two forms – one with a standard RC shear-wall structure and one with an equivalent mass-timber (cross-laminated timber, CLT) structure – and compared their seismic performance, environmental impacts, and construction costs. Nonlinear static (pushover) and response spectrum analyses were conducted for both designs in accordance with applicable seismic design standards. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantify embodied carbon and energy, and a cost analysis was carried out using local 2023 material prices. The CLT building achieved adequate seismic performance, with fundamental periods about twice as long as the RC building and base shear forces roughly one-third as large. Although the CLT structure experienced larger lateral drifts, these remained within serviceable limits. In terms of sustainability, the mass-timber design showed dramatically lower environmental impacts – roughly an order of magnitude reduction in embodied carbon and energy – compared to the RC design. The primary trade-off was economic: due to current material pricing and supply constraints, the mass-timber building’s estimated construction cost was approximately 5–6 times higher than the RC building. Overall, the results indicate that mass-timber is a structurally viable and environmentally advantageous option for post-earthquake reconstruction of mid-rise buildings in Türkiye, provided that issues of cost and material supply can be addressed through future policy and market developments.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.