基于傅立叶振幅谱的地震危险性分析中多个地震动强度测度的统一概率评估

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Haizhong Zhang, Yan-Gang Zhao, Rui Zhang, Hongjun Si
{"title":"基于傅立叶振幅谱的地震危险性分析中多个地震动强度测度的统一概率评估","authors":"Haizhong Zhang,&nbsp;Yan-Gang Zhao,&nbsp;Rui Zhang,&nbsp;Hongjun Si","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02189-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Different ground-motion intensity measures capture unique aspects of seismic motion, all of which play vital roles in probability seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), depending on the objectives under consideration and the design or analysis methods employed. Within the current PSHA framework, performing probability assessments for multiple intensity measures to obtain their seismic hazard curves typically requires multiple ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for each intensity measure. While GMPEs for some intensity measures can be approximated from existing ones through modifications, many still need to be developed through regression analyses of extensive earthquake data. However, besides the laborious task of constructing multiple GMPEs, recent studies have also pointed out the difficulty in directly constraining the scaling of these intensity measures within GMPEs using seismological theory. To address these challenges, this study proposes a more efficient, physically reasonable, and internally consistent framework for probabilistically analyzing multiple intensity measures. Firstly, to avoid the effort of constructing multiple GMPEs, this study exclusively adopts the GMPE of the Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) coupled with a ground-motion duration model. Subsequently, multiple intensity measures are simultaneously estimated based on theoretical relationships between FAS with each intensity measure. In addition, given that Fourier spectra are more closely related to the physics of wave propagation, the scaling of FAS in GMPE is easier to constrain using seismological theory. Furthermore, the moment method, in conjunction with Latin hypercube sampling, is applied to calculate the exceedance probability for each intensity measure, thereby obtaining corresponding seismic hazard curves. Finally, a numerical example was conducted to verify the proposed framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 10","pages":"3837 - 3859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A unified probabilistic assessment of multiple ground-motion intensity measures in seismic hazard analysis based on Fourier amplitude spectra\",\"authors\":\"Haizhong Zhang,&nbsp;Yan-Gang Zhao,&nbsp;Rui Zhang,&nbsp;Hongjun Si\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02189-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Different ground-motion intensity measures capture unique aspects of seismic motion, all of which play vital roles in probability seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), depending on the objectives under consideration and the design or analysis methods employed. Within the current PSHA framework, performing probability assessments for multiple intensity measures to obtain their seismic hazard curves typically requires multiple ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for each intensity measure. While GMPEs for some intensity measures can be approximated from existing ones through modifications, many still need to be developed through regression analyses of extensive earthquake data. However, besides the laborious task of constructing multiple GMPEs, recent studies have also pointed out the difficulty in directly constraining the scaling of these intensity measures within GMPEs using seismological theory. To address these challenges, this study proposes a more efficient, physically reasonable, and internally consistent framework for probabilistically analyzing multiple intensity measures. Firstly, to avoid the effort of constructing multiple GMPEs, this study exclusively adopts the GMPE of the Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) coupled with a ground-motion duration model. Subsequently, multiple intensity measures are simultaneously estimated based on theoretical relationships between FAS with each intensity measure. In addition, given that Fourier spectra are more closely related to the physics of wave propagation, the scaling of FAS in GMPE is easier to constrain using seismological theory. Furthermore, the moment method, in conjunction with Latin hypercube sampling, is applied to calculate the exceedance probability for each intensity measure, thereby obtaining corresponding seismic hazard curves. Finally, a numerical example was conducted to verify the proposed framework.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 10\",\"pages\":\"3837 - 3859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02189-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02189-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据所考虑的目标和所采用的设计或分析方法,不同的地面运动强度测量方法捕捉到地震运动的独特方面,所有这些都在概率地震危害分析(PSHA)中起着至关重要的作用。在目前的PSHA框架内,对多个强度测量进行概率评估以获得地震危险曲线,通常需要为每个强度测量提供多个地震动预测方程(GMPEs)。虽然一些烈度测量方法的GMPEs可以通过修改来近似于现有的方法,但许多方法仍然需要通过对大量地震数据的回归分析来发展。然而,除了构建多个GMPEs的艰巨任务外,最近的研究也指出,使用地震理论直接限制GMPEs内这些强度测量的尺度是困难的。为了应对这些挑战,本研究提出了一个更有效、物理上合理、内部一致的框架,用于概率分析多种强度测量。首先,为了避免构建多个GMPE,本研究仅采用傅立叶振幅谱(FAS)的GMPE与地震动持续时间模型相结合。随后,基于FAS与每个强度测量之间的理论关系,同时估计多个强度测量。此外,考虑到傅里叶谱与波传播物理更密切相关,用地震学理论更容易约束GMPE中FAS的标度。应用矩量法结合拉丁超立方抽样计算各烈度测度的超过概率,得到相应的地震危险性曲线。最后,通过数值算例对所提框架进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A unified probabilistic assessment of multiple ground-motion intensity measures in seismic hazard analysis based on Fourier amplitude spectra

A unified probabilistic assessment of multiple ground-motion intensity measures in seismic hazard analysis based on Fourier amplitude spectra

A unified probabilistic assessment of multiple ground-motion intensity measures in seismic hazard analysis based on Fourier amplitude spectra

Different ground-motion intensity measures capture unique aspects of seismic motion, all of which play vital roles in probability seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), depending on the objectives under consideration and the design or analysis methods employed. Within the current PSHA framework, performing probability assessments for multiple intensity measures to obtain their seismic hazard curves typically requires multiple ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for each intensity measure. While GMPEs for some intensity measures can be approximated from existing ones through modifications, many still need to be developed through regression analyses of extensive earthquake data. However, besides the laborious task of constructing multiple GMPEs, recent studies have also pointed out the difficulty in directly constraining the scaling of these intensity measures within GMPEs using seismological theory. To address these challenges, this study proposes a more efficient, physically reasonable, and internally consistent framework for probabilistically analyzing multiple intensity measures. Firstly, to avoid the effort of constructing multiple GMPEs, this study exclusively adopts the GMPE of the Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) coupled with a ground-motion duration model. Subsequently, multiple intensity measures are simultaneously estimated based on theoretical relationships between FAS with each intensity measure. In addition, given that Fourier spectra are more closely related to the physics of wave propagation, the scaling of FAS in GMPE is easier to constrain using seismological theory. Furthermore, the moment method, in conjunction with Latin hypercube sampling, is applied to calculate the exceedance probability for each intensity measure, thereby obtaining corresponding seismic hazard curves. Finally, a numerical example was conducted to verify the proposed framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信