{"title":"基于形成性研究方法论的当代时尚评论模式实证研究","authors":"Sujin Park, Jisoo Ha","doi":"10.1186/s40691-025-00432-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous studies on fashion criticism have predominantly focused on theoretical reviews, offering limited practical methodologies for engaging in fashion criticism. To address this gap, the primary objective of this study is to propose and empirically validate a contemporary fashion criticism model that bridges the divide between theoretical understanding and practical application. Two research questions are addressed: First, what are the essential elements of a contemporary fashion criticism model that differentiate it from traditional art criticism? Second, what factors are necessary to ensure that a contemporary fashion criticism model is grounded in practical relevance? The study employed formative research to develop and validate the model. A basic model was initially constructed using basic and supplementary elements derived from art criticism models. The proposed model then underwent multiple rounds of internal and external validation by eight experts. The Content Validity Index and Inter-Rater Agreement were used to assess content validity, while external validation was conducted through the experimental application of the developed model in critiquing fashion objects and in-depth interviews. The finalized model consists of 7 procedures and 14 detailed criteria, all confirmed for validity and reliability. This model integrates diverse perspectives on contemporary fashion criticism, reflecting its “situationality,” which contrasts the relatively static nature of art criticism. It serves as a valuable and versatile tool for objectively assessing contemporary fashion, providing a foundational benchmark for experts and broader audiences alike.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":555,"journal":{"name":"Fashion and Textiles","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://fashionandtextiles.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40691-025-00432-z","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A contemporary fashion criticism model based on formative research methodology: an empirical study\",\"authors\":\"Sujin Park, Jisoo Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40691-025-00432-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous studies on fashion criticism have predominantly focused on theoretical reviews, offering limited practical methodologies for engaging in fashion criticism. To address this gap, the primary objective of this study is to propose and empirically validate a contemporary fashion criticism model that bridges the divide between theoretical understanding and practical application. Two research questions are addressed: First, what are the essential elements of a contemporary fashion criticism model that differentiate it from traditional art criticism? Second, what factors are necessary to ensure that a contemporary fashion criticism model is grounded in practical relevance? The study employed formative research to develop and validate the model. A basic model was initially constructed using basic and supplementary elements derived from art criticism models. The proposed model then underwent multiple rounds of internal and external validation by eight experts. The Content Validity Index and Inter-Rater Agreement were used to assess content validity, while external validation was conducted through the experimental application of the developed model in critiquing fashion objects and in-depth interviews. The finalized model consists of 7 procedures and 14 detailed criteria, all confirmed for validity and reliability. This model integrates diverse perspectives on contemporary fashion criticism, reflecting its “situationality,” which contrasts the relatively static nature of art criticism. It serves as a valuable and versatile tool for objectively assessing contemporary fashion, providing a foundational benchmark for experts and broader audiences alike.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fashion and Textiles\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://fashionandtextiles.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40691-025-00432-z\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fashion and Textiles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40691-025-00432-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fashion and Textiles","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40691-025-00432-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A contemporary fashion criticism model based on formative research methodology: an empirical study
Previous studies on fashion criticism have predominantly focused on theoretical reviews, offering limited practical methodologies for engaging in fashion criticism. To address this gap, the primary objective of this study is to propose and empirically validate a contemporary fashion criticism model that bridges the divide between theoretical understanding and practical application. Two research questions are addressed: First, what are the essential elements of a contemporary fashion criticism model that differentiate it from traditional art criticism? Second, what factors are necessary to ensure that a contemporary fashion criticism model is grounded in practical relevance? The study employed formative research to develop and validate the model. A basic model was initially constructed using basic and supplementary elements derived from art criticism models. The proposed model then underwent multiple rounds of internal and external validation by eight experts. The Content Validity Index and Inter-Rater Agreement were used to assess content validity, while external validation was conducted through the experimental application of the developed model in critiquing fashion objects and in-depth interviews. The finalized model consists of 7 procedures and 14 detailed criteria, all confirmed for validity and reliability. This model integrates diverse perspectives on contemporary fashion criticism, reflecting its “situationality,” which contrasts the relatively static nature of art criticism. It serves as a valuable and versatile tool for objectively assessing contemporary fashion, providing a foundational benchmark for experts and broader audiences alike.
期刊介绍:
Fashion and Textiles aims to advance knowledge and to seek new perspectives in the fashion and textiles industry worldwide. We welcome original research articles, reviews, case studies, book reviews and letters to the editor.
The scope of the journal includes the following four technical research divisions:
Textile Science and Technology: Textile Material Science and Technology; Dyeing and Finishing; Smart and Intelligent Textiles
Clothing Science and Technology: Physiology of Clothing/Textile Products; Protective clothing ; Smart and Intelligent clothing; Sportswear; Mass customization ; Apparel manufacturing
Economics of Clothing and Textiles/Fashion Business: Management of the Clothing and Textiles Industry; Merchandising; Retailing; Fashion Marketing; Consumer Behavior; Socio-psychology of Fashion
Fashion Design and Cultural Study on Fashion: Aesthetic Aspects of Fashion Product or Design Process; Textiles/Clothing/Fashion Design; Fashion Trend; History of Fashion; Costume or Dress; Fashion Theory; Fashion journalism; Fashion exhibition.