基于ISM-BN模型的土石坝溃坝风险因素耦合分析

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yanlong Li, Qiaogang Yin, Yuchun Zhang, Ting Wang, Ning Shi, Zengguang Xu, Yunhe Liu
{"title":"基于ISM-BN模型的土石坝溃坝风险因素耦合分析","authors":"Yanlong Li,&nbsp;Qiaogang Yin,&nbsp;Yuchun Zhang,&nbsp;Ting Wang,&nbsp;Ning Shi,&nbsp;Zengguang Xu,&nbsp;Yunhe Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12495-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying the coupling relationships among risk factors of earth-rock dam break, identifying critical failure paths, and determining core risk factors are essential for improving dam risk management. To this end, this study proposes a risk factor coupling analysis framework based on the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) and Bayesian Network (BN). First, 16 representative risk factors were selected through an analysis of domestic and international dam failure cases, establishing a risk assessment index system for earth-rock dam break. A statistical analysis was then conducted on 592 cases of failed and hazardous earth-rock dams. Second, the ISM method was employed to hierarchically classify risk factors, and a BN-based topological structure was constructed. The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm was used for BN parameter learning. Finally, causal inference and inverse diagnostic reasoning were applied to quantitatively analyze the influence intensity and sensitivity of risk factors. The results indicate a significant coupling effect among risk factors, with multi-factor interactions markedly increasing dam break risk. The most probable break path is: improper human operation (S5) → extreme flood (S1) → slope instability (S7) → damage to flood discharge structures (S4) → overtopping (L1) → dam break. The key risk factors influencing dam break are L1, insufficient spillway discharge capacity (S3), and S4. This study provides a scientific basis for the safety management and risk prevention of earth-rock dams, contributing to improved risk identification and mitigation capabilities in dam engineering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupling analysis of earth-rock dam break risk factors based on the ISM-BN model\",\"authors\":\"Yanlong Li,&nbsp;Qiaogang Yin,&nbsp;Yuchun Zhang,&nbsp;Ting Wang,&nbsp;Ning Shi,&nbsp;Zengguang Xu,&nbsp;Yunhe Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12495-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quantifying the coupling relationships among risk factors of earth-rock dam break, identifying critical failure paths, and determining core risk factors are essential for improving dam risk management. To this end, this study proposes a risk factor coupling analysis framework based on the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) and Bayesian Network (BN). First, 16 representative risk factors were selected through an analysis of domestic and international dam failure cases, establishing a risk assessment index system for earth-rock dam break. A statistical analysis was then conducted on 592 cases of failed and hazardous earth-rock dams. Second, the ISM method was employed to hierarchically classify risk factors, and a BN-based topological structure was constructed. The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm was used for BN parameter learning. Finally, causal inference and inverse diagnostic reasoning were applied to quantitatively analyze the influence intensity and sensitivity of risk factors. The results indicate a significant coupling effect among risk factors, with multi-factor interactions markedly increasing dam break risk. The most probable break path is: improper human operation (S5) → extreme flood (S1) → slope instability (S7) → damage to flood discharge structures (S4) → overtopping (L1) → dam break. The key risk factors influencing dam break are L1, insufficient spillway discharge capacity (S3), and S4. This study provides a scientific basis for the safety management and risk prevention of earth-rock dams, contributing to improved risk identification and mitigation capabilities in dam engineering.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12495-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12495-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量化土石坝溃坝风险因素之间的耦合关系,识别关键破坏路径,确定核心风险因素,是提高大坝风险管理水平的关键。为此,本研究提出了一个基于解释结构模型(ISM)和贝叶斯网络(BN)的风险因素耦合分析框架。首先,通过分析国内外溃坝案例,选取了16个具有代表性的风险因素,建立了土石坝溃坝风险评价指标体系。对592例土石坝溃坝和危险土石坝进行了统计分析。其次,采用ISM方法对危险因素进行分层分类,构建基于bn的拓扑结构;采用期望最大化(EM)算法对BN参数进行学习。最后,运用因果推理和逆向诊断推理定量分析危险因素的影响强度和敏感性。结果表明,危险因素之间存在显著的耦合效应,多因素相互作用显著增加溃坝风险。最可能的溃坝路径为:人为操作不当(S5)→极端洪水(S1)→边坡失稳(S7)→泄洪设施破坏(S4)→漫顶(L1)→溃坝。影响溃坝的主要危险因素为L1、泄洪能力不足(S3)和S4。本研究为土石坝安全管理和风险防范提供了科学依据,有助于提高大坝工程风险识别和化解能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coupling analysis of earth-rock dam break risk factors based on the ISM-BN model

Quantifying the coupling relationships among risk factors of earth-rock dam break, identifying critical failure paths, and determining core risk factors are essential for improving dam risk management. To this end, this study proposes a risk factor coupling analysis framework based on the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) and Bayesian Network (BN). First, 16 representative risk factors were selected through an analysis of domestic and international dam failure cases, establishing a risk assessment index system for earth-rock dam break. A statistical analysis was then conducted on 592 cases of failed and hazardous earth-rock dams. Second, the ISM method was employed to hierarchically classify risk factors, and a BN-based topological structure was constructed. The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm was used for BN parameter learning. Finally, causal inference and inverse diagnostic reasoning were applied to quantitatively analyze the influence intensity and sensitivity of risk factors. The results indicate a significant coupling effect among risk factors, with multi-factor interactions markedly increasing dam break risk. The most probable break path is: improper human operation (S5) → extreme flood (S1) → slope instability (S7) → damage to flood discharge structures (S4) → overtopping (L1) → dam break. The key risk factors influencing dam break are L1, insufficient spillway discharge capacity (S3), and S4. This study provides a scientific basis for the safety management and risk prevention of earth-rock dams, contributing to improved risk identification and mitigation capabilities in dam engineering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信