Daniele Rizzo, Leigh S. Sutherland, Giulia Palomba, Gabriella Epasto
{"title":"结合夹层结构准静力与冲击行为评价动态标度因子","authors":"Daniele Rizzo, Leigh S. Sutherland, Giulia Palomba, Gabriella Epasto","doi":"10.1007/s11665-025-11428-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Composite sandwich materials are commonplace in the aerospace, marine, automotive, civil and other industries, but their susceptibility to dynamic impact and quasi-static concentrated loadings is still a concern. This work has two aims; (i) to perform Quasi-static (QS) and Low-velocity impact (LVI) tests to calculate a novel predictive parameter, the Dynamic scaling factor (DSF), defined as the ratio of LVI to QS results. The DSF allows the prediction of the impact behaviour by easier and lower-cost quasi-static tests. (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of Aluminium honeycomb sandwich (AHS) as a new sustainable alternative to composite sandwich. The mechanical tests were carried out using two different tups, hemispherical and conical, and damage detection employed Non-destructive techniques (NDT), specifically x-ray digital radiography. Two ‘traditional’ composite sandwich solutions, a thinner, lighter GFRP/PVC laminate and a thicker, heavier GFRP/balsa one, were compared with two AHS panels of equivalent bending stiffness to the composite sandwiches. For the perforation of the upper face only, results indicated that AHS absorbed more energy. If the complete perforation of the whole sandwich is considered, GFRP/PVC and GFRP/balsa sandwich composites absorbed more energy. The DSF was found to be greater than or equal to unity, varying between 1 and 2, depending on laminate thickness, material, tup geometry, and damage level considered. When perforation of the first skin is important, AHS can provide a new viable high-performance lightweight alternative to ‘traditional’ composites in terms of impact strength whilst providing a more sustainable alternative. This makes AHS a valuable new material choice in marine applications that emphasises weight reduction, energy efficiency and recyclability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","volume":"34 15","pages":"15376 - 15388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Dynamic Scaling Factor by Correlating Quasi-static and Impact Behavior of Sandwich Structures\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Rizzo, Leigh S. Sutherland, Giulia Palomba, Gabriella Epasto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11665-025-11428-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Composite sandwich materials are commonplace in the aerospace, marine, automotive, civil and other industries, but their susceptibility to dynamic impact and quasi-static concentrated loadings is still a concern. This work has two aims; (i) to perform Quasi-static (QS) and Low-velocity impact (LVI) tests to calculate a novel predictive parameter, the Dynamic scaling factor (DSF), defined as the ratio of LVI to QS results. The DSF allows the prediction of the impact behaviour by easier and lower-cost quasi-static tests. (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of Aluminium honeycomb sandwich (AHS) as a new sustainable alternative to composite sandwich. The mechanical tests were carried out using two different tups, hemispherical and conical, and damage detection employed Non-destructive techniques (NDT), specifically x-ray digital radiography. Two ‘traditional’ composite sandwich solutions, a thinner, lighter GFRP/PVC laminate and a thicker, heavier GFRP/balsa one, were compared with two AHS panels of equivalent bending stiffness to the composite sandwiches. For the perforation of the upper face only, results indicated that AHS absorbed more energy. If the complete perforation of the whole sandwich is considered, GFRP/PVC and GFRP/balsa sandwich composites absorbed more energy. The DSF was found to be greater than or equal to unity, varying between 1 and 2, depending on laminate thickness, material, tup geometry, and damage level considered. When perforation of the first skin is important, AHS can provide a new viable high-performance lightweight alternative to ‘traditional’ composites in terms of impact strength whilst providing a more sustainable alternative. This makes AHS a valuable new material choice in marine applications that emphasises weight reduction, energy efficiency and recyclability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance\",\"volume\":\"34 15\",\"pages\":\"15376 - 15388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-025-11428-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-025-11428-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Dynamic Scaling Factor by Correlating Quasi-static and Impact Behavior of Sandwich Structures
Composite sandwich materials are commonplace in the aerospace, marine, automotive, civil and other industries, but their susceptibility to dynamic impact and quasi-static concentrated loadings is still a concern. This work has two aims; (i) to perform Quasi-static (QS) and Low-velocity impact (LVI) tests to calculate a novel predictive parameter, the Dynamic scaling factor (DSF), defined as the ratio of LVI to QS results. The DSF allows the prediction of the impact behaviour by easier and lower-cost quasi-static tests. (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of Aluminium honeycomb sandwich (AHS) as a new sustainable alternative to composite sandwich. The mechanical tests were carried out using two different tups, hemispherical and conical, and damage detection employed Non-destructive techniques (NDT), specifically x-ray digital radiography. Two ‘traditional’ composite sandwich solutions, a thinner, lighter GFRP/PVC laminate and a thicker, heavier GFRP/balsa one, were compared with two AHS panels of equivalent bending stiffness to the composite sandwiches. For the perforation of the upper face only, results indicated that AHS absorbed more energy. If the complete perforation of the whole sandwich is considered, GFRP/PVC and GFRP/balsa sandwich composites absorbed more energy. The DSF was found to be greater than or equal to unity, varying between 1 and 2, depending on laminate thickness, material, tup geometry, and damage level considered. When perforation of the first skin is important, AHS can provide a new viable high-performance lightweight alternative to ‘traditional’ composites in terms of impact strength whilst providing a more sustainable alternative. This makes AHS a valuable new material choice in marine applications that emphasises weight reduction, energy efficiency and recyclability.
期刊介绍:
ASM International''s Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance focuses on solving day-to-day engineering challenges, particularly those involving components for larger systems. The journal presents a clear understanding of relationships between materials selection, processing, applications and performance.
The Journal of Materials Engineering covers all aspects of materials selection, design, processing, characterization and evaluation, including how to improve materials properties through processes and process control of casting, forming, heat treating, surface modification and coating, and fabrication.
Testing and characterization (including mechanical and physical tests, NDE, metallography, failure analysis, corrosion resistance, chemical analysis, surface characterization, and microanalysis of surfaces, features and fractures), and industrial performance measurement are also covered