利用预测模型研究了配合比设计参数对预集料绿色混凝土抗压强度的影响

Saif Harith Fouad, Ahmed Salih Mohammed
{"title":"利用预测模型研究了配合比设计参数对预集料绿色混凝土抗压强度的影响","authors":"Saif Harith Fouad,&nbsp;Ahmed Salih Mohammed","doi":"10.1007/s44150-025-00170-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a predictive framework for estimating the compressive strength of preplaced aggregate concrete (PAC) using a comprehensive dataset and advanced statistical modeling. A total of 261 concrete mix samples were compiled, each incorporating various combinations of materials such as cement, fly ash, silica fume, GGBS, sand, gravel, water, superplasticizer, and expanding admixtures. Key mix design parameters like the water-to-binder (W/B) and sand-to-binder (S/B) ratios were systematically varied to reflect realistic construction practices. To identify the most influential components and improve model performance, data normalization and sensitivity analysis were performed. The analysis revealed that the W/B ratio was the most critical factor, contributing approximately 31.5% to compressive strength variation. The independent variable ranges in the dataset are as follows: cement (176–873 kg/m3), fly ash (0–262 kg/m3), silica fume (0–57 kg/m3), GGBS (0–228 kg/m3), sand (0–873 kg/m3), water (100–431 kg/m3), gravel (1.5–2001 kg/m3), water to cement ration (W/B) ranged between 0.3–0.85, S/B (0–2), superplasticizer (0–10.9 kg/m3), and expanding admixture (0–58.6 kg/m3). Compressive strength, the dependent variable, ranged from 5.7 MPa to 58.6 MPa. Sensitivity analysis identified W/B as the most influential variable, showing a sensitivity of 31.5% across samples. After testing multiple models, the Full Quadratic (FQ) model emerged as the most accurate based on RMSE, MAE, and OBJ performance criteria. The strength values ranged from 5.7 MPa to 58.6 MPa, encompassing low- to high-strength concrete applications. Among several tested models, the Full Quadratic (FQ) model demonstrated the highest prediction accuracy based on key evaluation metrics (RMSE, MAE, and objective function). This model offers a reliable tool for engineers to estimate compressive strength and optimize mix design without extensive laboratory testing. The proposed approach contributes to reducing construction costs, enhancing design efficiency, and supporting data-driven decision-making in sustainable concrete development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the influence of mix design parameters on compressive strength in preplaced-aggregate green concrete using predictive models\",\"authors\":\"Saif Harith Fouad,&nbsp;Ahmed Salih Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44150-025-00170-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents a predictive framework for estimating the compressive strength of preplaced aggregate concrete (PAC) using a comprehensive dataset and advanced statistical modeling. A total of 261 concrete mix samples were compiled, each incorporating various combinations of materials such as cement, fly ash, silica fume, GGBS, sand, gravel, water, superplasticizer, and expanding admixtures. Key mix design parameters like the water-to-binder (W/B) and sand-to-binder (S/B) ratios were systematically varied to reflect realistic construction practices. To identify the most influential components and improve model performance, data normalization and sensitivity analysis were performed. The analysis revealed that the W/B ratio was the most critical factor, contributing approximately 31.5% to compressive strength variation. The independent variable ranges in the dataset are as follows: cement (176–873 kg/m3), fly ash (0–262 kg/m3), silica fume (0–57 kg/m3), GGBS (0–228 kg/m3), sand (0–873 kg/m3), water (100–431 kg/m3), gravel (1.5–2001 kg/m3), water to cement ration (W/B) ranged between 0.3–0.85, S/B (0–2), superplasticizer (0–10.9 kg/m3), and expanding admixture (0–58.6 kg/m3). Compressive strength, the dependent variable, ranged from 5.7 MPa to 58.6 MPa. Sensitivity analysis identified W/B as the most influential variable, showing a sensitivity of 31.5% across samples. After testing multiple models, the Full Quadratic (FQ) model emerged as the most accurate based on RMSE, MAE, and OBJ performance criteria. The strength values ranged from 5.7 MPa to 58.6 MPa, encompassing low- to high-strength concrete applications. Among several tested models, the Full Quadratic (FQ) model demonstrated the highest prediction accuracy based on key evaluation metrics (RMSE, MAE, and objective function). This model offers a reliable tool for engineers to estimate compressive strength and optimize mix design without extensive laboratory testing. The proposed approach contributes to reducing construction costs, enhancing design efficiency, and supporting data-driven decision-making in sustainable concrete development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00170-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00170-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一个预测框架,用于估计预集料混凝土(PAC)的抗压强度,使用全面的数据集和先进的统计建模。共编制了261个混凝土混合样品,每个样品都包含各种材料组合,如水泥、粉煤灰、硅灰、GGBS、沙子、砾石、水、高效减水剂和膨胀外加剂。关键的配合比设计参数,如水胶比(W/B)和砂胶比(S/B),系统地变化,以反映实际的施工实践。为了识别最具影响力的成分并提高模型性能,进行了数据归一化和敏感性分析。分析表明,W/B比是最关键的因素,对抗压强度变化的贡献率约为31.5%。数据集中的自变量范围如下:水泥(176-873 kg/m3),粉煤灰(0-262 kg/m3),硅灰(0-57 kg/m3), GGBS (0-228 kg/m3),沙子(0-873 kg/m3),水(100-431 kg/m3),砾石(1.5-2001 kg/m3),水灰比(W/B)范围为0.3-0.85,S/B(0-2),高效减水剂(0-10.9 kg/m3),膨胀外加剂(0-58.6 kg/m3)。因变量抗压强度为5.7 ~ 58.6 MPa。敏感性分析发现,W/B是影响最大的变量,在整个样本中显示出31.5%的敏感性。在测试了多个模型后,基于RMSE、MAE和OBJ性能标准,全二次(FQ)模型是最准确的。强度值范围从5.7 MPa到58.6 MPa,包括低强度到高强度混凝土的应用。在几个被测试的模型中,基于关键评估指标(RMSE, MAE和目标函数)的全二次(FQ)模型显示出最高的预测精度。该模型为工程师估计抗压强度和优化混合设计提供了可靠的工具,而无需大量的实验室测试。提出的方法有助于降低建筑成本,提高设计效率,并支持可持续混凝土开发中的数据驱动决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the influence of mix design parameters on compressive strength in preplaced-aggregate green concrete using predictive models

This study presents a predictive framework for estimating the compressive strength of preplaced aggregate concrete (PAC) using a comprehensive dataset and advanced statistical modeling. A total of 261 concrete mix samples were compiled, each incorporating various combinations of materials such as cement, fly ash, silica fume, GGBS, sand, gravel, water, superplasticizer, and expanding admixtures. Key mix design parameters like the water-to-binder (W/B) and sand-to-binder (S/B) ratios were systematically varied to reflect realistic construction practices. To identify the most influential components and improve model performance, data normalization and sensitivity analysis were performed. The analysis revealed that the W/B ratio was the most critical factor, contributing approximately 31.5% to compressive strength variation. The independent variable ranges in the dataset are as follows: cement (176–873 kg/m3), fly ash (0–262 kg/m3), silica fume (0–57 kg/m3), GGBS (0–228 kg/m3), sand (0–873 kg/m3), water (100–431 kg/m3), gravel (1.5–2001 kg/m3), water to cement ration (W/B) ranged between 0.3–0.85, S/B (0–2), superplasticizer (0–10.9 kg/m3), and expanding admixture (0–58.6 kg/m3). Compressive strength, the dependent variable, ranged from 5.7 MPa to 58.6 MPa. Sensitivity analysis identified W/B as the most influential variable, showing a sensitivity of 31.5% across samples. After testing multiple models, the Full Quadratic (FQ) model emerged as the most accurate based on RMSE, MAE, and OBJ performance criteria. The strength values ranged from 5.7 MPa to 58.6 MPa, encompassing low- to high-strength concrete applications. Among several tested models, the Full Quadratic (FQ) model demonstrated the highest prediction accuracy based on key evaluation metrics (RMSE, MAE, and objective function). This model offers a reliable tool for engineers to estimate compressive strength and optimize mix design without extensive laboratory testing. The proposed approach contributes to reducing construction costs, enhancing design efficiency, and supporting data-driven decision-making in sustainable concrete development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信