{"title":"修正QCD对\\(e^+e^-\\)碰撞中Z \\(\\rightarrow \\,b\\overline{b}\\)前后不对称性的影响","authors":"David d’Enterria, Cynthia Yan","doi":"10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01656-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The forward–backward (FB) asymmetry of <i>b</i> quarks in <span>\\(e^+e^-\\)</span> collisions at the Z pole measured at LEP, <span>\\(A_{_{\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0992\\pm 0.0016\\)</span>, remains today one of the electroweak precision observables with the largest disagreement (2.4<span>\\(\\sigma \\)</span>) with respect to the Standard Model prediction, <span>\\((A_{_{\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b})_{_\\textrm{th}} = 0.1030 \\pm 0.0002\\)</span>. Beyond the dominant statistical uncertainties, QCD effects, such as <i>b</i>-quark showering and hadronization, are the leading sources of <span>\\(A_{_{\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\\)</span> systematic uncertainty, and have not been revised in the last twenty years. We reassess the QCD uncertainties of the eight original <span>\\(A_{_{\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\\)</span> LEP measurements, using modern parton shower <span>pythia</span> 8 and <span>vincia</span> simulations with nine different implementations of soft and collinear radiation as well as of parton fragmentation. Our analysis, combined with NNLO massive <i>b</i>-quark corrections independently computed, indicates total propagated QCD uncertainties of <span>\\(\\sim \\)</span>0.7% and <span>\\(\\sim \\)</span>0.3% for the lepton- and jet-charge analyses, respectively, that are about a factor of two smaller than those of the original LEP results. Accounting for such updated QCD effects leads to a new <span>\\(A_{_{\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0995\\pm 0.0016\\)</span> average, with a data-theory tension slightly reduced from 2.4<span>\\(\\sigma \\)</span> to 2.2<span>\\(\\sigma \\)</span>. Confirmation or resolution of this long-term discrepancy requires a new high-luminosity <span>\\(e^+e^-\\)</span> collider collecting orders-of-magnitude more data at the Z pole to significantly reduce the dominant <span>\\(A_{_{\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\\)</span> statistical uncertainties, and to improve our understanding of <i>b</i>-quark showering and hadronization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":786,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal A","volume":"61 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01656-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revised QCD effects on the Z \\\\(\\\\rightarrow \\\\,b\\\\overline{b}\\\\) forward–backward asymmetry in \\\\(e^+e^-\\\\) collisions\",\"authors\":\"David d’Enterria, Cynthia Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01656-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The forward–backward (FB) asymmetry of <i>b</i> quarks in <span>\\\\(e^+e^-\\\\)</span> collisions at the Z pole measured at LEP, <span>\\\\(A_{_{\\\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0992\\\\pm 0.0016\\\\)</span>, remains today one of the electroweak precision observables with the largest disagreement (2.4<span>\\\\(\\\\sigma \\\\)</span>) with respect to the Standard Model prediction, <span>\\\\((A_{_{\\\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b})_{_\\\\textrm{th}} = 0.1030 \\\\pm 0.0002\\\\)</span>. Beyond the dominant statistical uncertainties, QCD effects, such as <i>b</i>-quark showering and hadronization, are the leading sources of <span>\\\\(A_{_{\\\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\\\\)</span> systematic uncertainty, and have not been revised in the last twenty years. We reassess the QCD uncertainties of the eight original <span>\\\\(A_{_{\\\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\\\\)</span> LEP measurements, using modern parton shower <span>pythia</span> 8 and <span>vincia</span> simulations with nine different implementations of soft and collinear radiation as well as of parton fragmentation. Our analysis, combined with NNLO massive <i>b</i>-quark corrections independently computed, indicates total propagated QCD uncertainties of <span>\\\\(\\\\sim \\\\)</span>0.7% and <span>\\\\(\\\\sim \\\\)</span>0.3% for the lepton- and jet-charge analyses, respectively, that are about a factor of two smaller than those of the original LEP results. Accounting for such updated QCD effects leads to a new <span>\\\\(A_{_{\\\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0995\\\\pm 0.0016\\\\)</span> average, with a data-theory tension slightly reduced from 2.4<span>\\\\(\\\\sigma \\\\)</span> to 2.2<span>\\\\(\\\\sigma \\\\)</span>. Confirmation or resolution of this long-term discrepancy requires a new high-luminosity <span>\\\\(e^+e^-\\\\)</span> collider collecting orders-of-magnitude more data at the Z pole to significantly reduce the dominant <span>\\\\(A_{_{\\\\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\\\\)</span> statistical uncertainties, and to improve our understanding of <i>b</i>-quark showering and hadronization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Physical Journal A\",\"volume\":\"61 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01656-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Physical Journal A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01656-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal A","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01656-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在LEP (\(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0992\pm 0.0016\))测量到的Z极\(e^+e^-\)碰撞中b夸克的正向-反向(FB)不对称性,今天仍然是与标准模型预测(\((A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b})_{_\textrm{th}} = 0.1030 \pm 0.0002\))分歧最大的电弱精度观测之一(2.4 \(\sigma \))。除了主要的统计不确定性之外,QCD效应,如b-夸克雨和强子化,是\(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\)系统不确定性的主要来源,并且在过去的二十年中没有被修正过。我们重新评估了8个原始\(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\) LEP测量的QCD不确定度,使用现代的部分子淋浴pythia 8和vincia模拟,采用9种不同的软共线辐射以及部分子碎片化实现。我们的分析,结合独立计算的NNLO大质量b夸克修正,表明总传播QCD不确定性为\(\sim \) 0.7% and \(\sim \)0.3% for the lepton- and jet-charge analyses, respectively, that are about a factor of two smaller than those of the original LEP results. Accounting for such updated QCD effects leads to a new \(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0995\pm 0.0016\) average, with a data-theory tension slightly reduced from 2.4\(\sigma \) to 2.2\(\sigma \). Confirmation or resolution of this long-term discrepancy requires a new high-luminosity \(e^+e^-\) collider collecting orders-of-magnitude more data at the Z pole to significantly reduce the dominant \(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\) statistical uncertainties, and to improve our understanding of b-quark showering and hadronization.
Revised QCD effects on the Z \(\rightarrow \,b\overline{b}\) forward–backward asymmetry in \(e^+e^-\) collisions
The forward–backward (FB) asymmetry of b quarks in \(e^+e^-\) collisions at the Z pole measured at LEP, \(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0992\pm 0.0016\), remains today one of the electroweak precision observables with the largest disagreement (2.4\(\sigma \)) with respect to the Standard Model prediction, \((A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b})_{_\textrm{th}} = 0.1030 \pm 0.0002\). Beyond the dominant statistical uncertainties, QCD effects, such as b-quark showering and hadronization, are the leading sources of \(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\) systematic uncertainty, and have not been revised in the last twenty years. We reassess the QCD uncertainties of the eight original \(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\) LEP measurements, using modern parton shower pythia 8 and vincia simulations with nine different implementations of soft and collinear radiation as well as of parton fragmentation. Our analysis, combined with NNLO massive b-quark corrections independently computed, indicates total propagated QCD uncertainties of \(\sim \)0.7% and \(\sim \)0.3% for the lepton- and jet-charge analyses, respectively, that are about a factor of two smaller than those of the original LEP results. Accounting for such updated QCD effects leads to a new \(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}= 0.0995\pm 0.0016\) average, with a data-theory tension slightly reduced from 2.4\(\sigma \) to 2.2\(\sigma \). Confirmation or resolution of this long-term discrepancy requires a new high-luminosity \(e^+e^-\) collider collecting orders-of-magnitude more data at the Z pole to significantly reduce the dominant \(A_{_{\textsc {fb}}}^{0,b}\) statistical uncertainties, and to improve our understanding of b-quark showering and hadronization.
期刊介绍:
Hadron Physics
Hadron Structure
Hadron Spectroscopy
Hadronic and Electroweak Interactions of Hadrons
Nonperturbative Approaches to QCD
Phenomenological Approaches to Hadron Physics
Nuclear and Quark Matter
Heavy-Ion Collisions
Phase Diagram of the Strong Interaction
Hard Probes
Quark-Gluon Plasma and Hadronic Matter
Relativistic Transport and Hydrodynamics
Compact Stars
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Structure and Reactions
Few-Body Systems
Radioactive Beams
Electroweak Interactions
Nuclear Astrophysics
Article Categories
Letters (Open Access)
Regular Articles
New Tools and Techniques
Reviews.