基于音乐的干预措施报告指南清单:解释和阐述指南

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Sheri L. Robb , K. Maya Story , Elizabeth Harman , Debra S. Burns , Joke Bradt , Emmeline Edwards , Tasha L. Golden , Christian Gold , John R. Iversen , Assal Habibi , Julene K. Johnson , Miriam Lense , Susan M. Perkins , Stacey Springs
{"title":"基于音乐的干预措施报告指南清单:解释和阐述指南","authors":"Sheri L. Robb ,&nbsp;K. Maya Story ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Harman ,&nbsp;Debra S. Burns ,&nbsp;Joke Bradt ,&nbsp;Emmeline Edwards ,&nbsp;Tasha L. Golden ,&nbsp;Christian Gold ,&nbsp;John R. Iversen ,&nbsp;Assal Habibi ,&nbsp;Julene K. Johnson ,&nbsp;Miriam Lense ,&nbsp;Susan M. Perkins ,&nbsp;Stacey Springs","doi":"10.1016/j.imr.2025.101200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Detailed intervention reporting is essential to interpretation, replication, and eventual translation of music-based interventions (MBIs) into practice. Despite availability of <em>Reporting Guidelines for Music-based Interventions</em> (RG-MBI, published 2011), multiple reviews reveal sustained problems with reporting quality and consistency. To address this, we convened an interdisciplinary expert panel to update and improve the utility and validity of the existing guidelines using a rigorous Delphi approach. The resulting updated checklist includes 12-items across eight areas considered essential to ensure transparent reporting of MBIs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The purpose of this explanation and elaboration document is to facilitate consistent understanding, use, and dissemination of the revised RG-MBI. Members of the interdisciplinary expert panel collaborated to create the resulting guidance statement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This guidance statement offers: (1) the scope and intended use of the RG-MBI, (2) an explanation for each checklist item, with examples from published studies, and (3) two published studies with annotations indicating where the authors reported each checklist item.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Broader uptake of the RG-MBIs by study authors, editors, and peer reviewers will lead to better reporting of MBI trials, and in turn facilitate greater replication of research, improve cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses, and increase implementation of findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13644,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Medicine Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"Article 101200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions checklist: Explanation and elaboration guide\",\"authors\":\"Sheri L. Robb ,&nbsp;K. Maya Story ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Harman ,&nbsp;Debra S. Burns ,&nbsp;Joke Bradt ,&nbsp;Emmeline Edwards ,&nbsp;Tasha L. Golden ,&nbsp;Christian Gold ,&nbsp;John R. Iversen ,&nbsp;Assal Habibi ,&nbsp;Julene K. Johnson ,&nbsp;Miriam Lense ,&nbsp;Susan M. Perkins ,&nbsp;Stacey Springs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.imr.2025.101200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Detailed intervention reporting is essential to interpretation, replication, and eventual translation of music-based interventions (MBIs) into practice. Despite availability of <em>Reporting Guidelines for Music-based Interventions</em> (RG-MBI, published 2011), multiple reviews reveal sustained problems with reporting quality and consistency. To address this, we convened an interdisciplinary expert panel to update and improve the utility and validity of the existing guidelines using a rigorous Delphi approach. The resulting updated checklist includes 12-items across eight areas considered essential to ensure transparent reporting of MBIs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The purpose of this explanation and elaboration document is to facilitate consistent understanding, use, and dissemination of the revised RG-MBI. Members of the interdisciplinary expert panel collaborated to create the resulting guidance statement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This guidance statement offers: (1) the scope and intended use of the RG-MBI, (2) an explanation for each checklist item, with examples from published studies, and (3) two published studies with annotations indicating where the authors reported each checklist item.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Broader uptake of the RG-MBIs by study authors, editors, and peer reviewers will lead to better reporting of MBI trials, and in turn facilitate greater replication of research, improve cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses, and increase implementation of findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422025000800\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422025000800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

详细的干预报告对于解释、复制和最终将基于音乐的干预(mbi)转化为实践至关重要。尽管有基于音乐的干预措施报告指南(RG-MBI, 2011年出版),但多次审查显示报告质量和一致性存在持续问题。为了解决这个问题,我们召集了一个跨学科专家小组,使用严格的德尔菲方法来更新和改进现有指南的实用性和有效性。由此产生的更新清单包括8个领域的12个项目,这些领域被认为是确保mbi报告透明的必要条件。方法本解释和阐述文件的目的是促进对修订后的RG-MBI的一致理解、使用和传播。跨学科专家小组的成员合作制定了最终的指导声明。本指导声明提供:(1)RG-MBI的范围和预期用途,(2)每个清单项目的解释,并从已发表的研究中举例,以及(3)两个已发表的研究,并附有注释,说明作者报告每个清单项目的位置。研究作者、编辑和同行审稿人更广泛地采用rg -MBI将有助于更好地报道MBI试验,从而促进研究的更多复制,改善交叉研究比较和荟萃分析,并增加研究结果的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions checklist: Explanation and elaboration guide

Background

Detailed intervention reporting is essential to interpretation, replication, and eventual translation of music-based interventions (MBIs) into practice. Despite availability of Reporting Guidelines for Music-based Interventions (RG-MBI, published 2011), multiple reviews reveal sustained problems with reporting quality and consistency. To address this, we convened an interdisciplinary expert panel to update and improve the utility and validity of the existing guidelines using a rigorous Delphi approach. The resulting updated checklist includes 12-items across eight areas considered essential to ensure transparent reporting of MBIs.

Methods

The purpose of this explanation and elaboration document is to facilitate consistent understanding, use, and dissemination of the revised RG-MBI. Members of the interdisciplinary expert panel collaborated to create the resulting guidance statement.

Results

This guidance statement offers: (1) the scope and intended use of the RG-MBI, (2) an explanation for each checklist item, with examples from published studies, and (3) two published studies with annotations indicating where the authors reported each checklist item.

Conclusion

Broader uptake of the RG-MBIs by study authors, editors, and peer reviewers will lead to better reporting of MBI trials, and in turn facilitate greater replication of research, improve cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses, and increase implementation of findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Medicine Research
Integrative Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative Medicine Research (IMR) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal focused on scientific research for integrative medicine including traditional medicine (emphasis on acupuncture and herbal medicine), complementary and alternative medicine, and systems medicine. The journal includes papers on basic research, clinical research, methodology, theory, computational analysis and modelling, topical reviews, medical history, education and policy based on physiology, pathology, diagnosis and the systems approach in the field of integrative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信