Benjamin D. Simon , Stephanie A. Harmon , Katie M. Merriman , Jesse Tetreault , Omer T. Esengur , Hunter Stecko , Enis C. Yilmaz , Lei Clifton , Anshul Thakur , Zoë Blake , Maria J. Merino , Julie Y. An , Jamie Marko , Yan Mee Law , Sandeep Gurram , David Clifton , Bradford J. Wood , Peter L. Choyke , Peter A. Pinto , Baris Turkbey
{"title":"基于基线MRI、术前临床协变量预测前列腺切除术后前列腺癌生化复发的多模式自动深度学习模型","authors":"Benjamin D. Simon , Stephanie A. Harmon , Katie M. Merriman , Jesse Tetreault , Omer T. Esengur , Hunter Stecko , Enis C. Yilmaz , Lei Clifton , Anshul Thakur , Zoë Blake , Maria J. Merino , Julie Y. An , Jamie Marko , Yan Mee Law , Sandeep Gurram , David Clifton , Bradford J. Wood , Peter L. Choyke , Peter A. Pinto , Baris Turkbey","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop a multimodal deep learning-based AI algorithm and investigate its ability to predict BCR of PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP) using MRI and clinical data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PCa patients (<em>n</em> = 311) underwent prostate MRI prior to RP between January 2008 and December 2018. For each patient, CAPRA-S was calculated. Quantitative imaging features were extracted using methods developed in a previous study. Test set results were assessed independently for each model in the study, using cross-validation of the training set to tune hyperparameters and select features. DeLong's test compared AUROC curve values, and log-rank tests compared BCR-free survival curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across all patients, the AUROC of the automated multimodal model was 0.74, compared to 0.66 for CAPRA-S. This model had the highest sensitivity at 75 %, with CAPRA-S at 37 %. BCR-free survival curves for the test set were generated for each model. Log-rank tests indicated each model differentiated between patient outcomes (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The automated multimodal model was the only model with <em>p</em> < 0.01. Focusing on intermediate risk patients (CAPRA-S scores 3–5), this automated model was the only model which maintained the ability to differentiate between outcomes (p < 0.01), while all other models and CAPRA-S failed to differentiate intermediate risk BCR outcomes (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Development of a multimodal model using quantitative imaging features and clinical covariates revealed that an automated multimodal AI approach most effectively predicts BCR in PCa patients. Based on AUROC and the ability to differentiate between BCR-free survival outcomes with statistical significance in intermediate risk patients, this model outperforms the gold standard postsurgical CAPRA-S risk scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 110579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multimodal automated deep learning-based model for predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy from baseline MRI, Presurgical clinical covariates\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin D. Simon , Stephanie A. Harmon , Katie M. Merriman , Jesse Tetreault , Omer T. Esengur , Hunter Stecko , Enis C. Yilmaz , Lei Clifton , Anshul Thakur , Zoë Blake , Maria J. Merino , Julie Y. An , Jamie Marko , Yan Mee Law , Sandeep Gurram , David Clifton , Bradford J. Wood , Peter L. Choyke , Peter A. Pinto , Baris Turkbey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop a multimodal deep learning-based AI algorithm and investigate its ability to predict BCR of PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP) using MRI and clinical data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PCa patients (<em>n</em> = 311) underwent prostate MRI prior to RP between January 2008 and December 2018. For each patient, CAPRA-S was calculated. Quantitative imaging features were extracted using methods developed in a previous study. Test set results were assessed independently for each model in the study, using cross-validation of the training set to tune hyperparameters and select features. DeLong's test compared AUROC curve values, and log-rank tests compared BCR-free survival curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across all patients, the AUROC of the automated multimodal model was 0.74, compared to 0.66 for CAPRA-S. This model had the highest sensitivity at 75 %, with CAPRA-S at 37 %. BCR-free survival curves for the test set were generated for each model. Log-rank tests indicated each model differentiated between patient outcomes (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The automated multimodal model was the only model with <em>p</em> < 0.01. Focusing on intermediate risk patients (CAPRA-S scores 3–5), this automated model was the only model which maintained the ability to differentiate between outcomes (p < 0.01), while all other models and CAPRA-S failed to differentiate intermediate risk BCR outcomes (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Development of a multimodal model using quantitative imaging features and clinical covariates revealed that an automated multimodal AI approach most effectively predicts BCR in PCa patients. Based on AUROC and the ability to differentiate between BCR-free survival outcomes with statistical significance in intermediate risk patients, this model outperforms the gold standard postsurgical CAPRA-S risk scores.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125001792\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125001792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A multimodal automated deep learning-based model for predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy from baseline MRI, Presurgical clinical covariates
Purpose
To develop a multimodal deep learning-based AI algorithm and investigate its ability to predict BCR of PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP) using MRI and clinical data.
Methods
PCa patients (n = 311) underwent prostate MRI prior to RP between January 2008 and December 2018. For each patient, CAPRA-S was calculated. Quantitative imaging features were extracted using methods developed in a previous study. Test set results were assessed independently for each model in the study, using cross-validation of the training set to tune hyperparameters and select features. DeLong's test compared AUROC curve values, and log-rank tests compared BCR-free survival curves.
Results
Across all patients, the AUROC of the automated multimodal model was 0.74, compared to 0.66 for CAPRA-S. This model had the highest sensitivity at 75 %, with CAPRA-S at 37 %. BCR-free survival curves for the test set were generated for each model. Log-rank tests indicated each model differentiated between patient outcomes (p < 0.05). The automated multimodal model was the only model with p < 0.01. Focusing on intermediate risk patients (CAPRA-S scores 3–5), this automated model was the only model which maintained the ability to differentiate between outcomes (p < 0.01), while all other models and CAPRA-S failed to differentiate intermediate risk BCR outcomes (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
Development of a multimodal model using quantitative imaging features and clinical covariates revealed that an automated multimodal AI approach most effectively predicts BCR in PCa patients. Based on AUROC and the ability to differentiate between BCR-free survival outcomes with statistical significance in intermediate risk patients, this model outperforms the gold standard postsurgical CAPRA-S risk scores.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology