建筑物的恢复能力准备水平:建立多灾害恢复能力指标和评级系统

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Simona Bianchi , Michele Matteoni , Kyujin Kim , Anna Maria Koniari , Kyra Koning , Romulus Costache , Nicu Ciobotaru , Alessandra Luna-Navarro , Zhikai Peng , Jonathan Ciurlanti , Hamidreza Shahriari , Divyae Mittal , Evdokia Stavridou , Anna Silva , Michele Palmieri , Stefano Pampanin , Francesco Petrini , Mauro Overend
{"title":"建筑物的恢复能力准备水平:建立多灾害恢复能力指标和评级系统","authors":"Simona Bianchi ,&nbsp;Michele Matteoni ,&nbsp;Kyujin Kim ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Koniari ,&nbsp;Kyra Koning ,&nbsp;Romulus Costache ,&nbsp;Nicu Ciobotaru ,&nbsp;Alessandra Luna-Navarro ,&nbsp;Zhikai Peng ,&nbsp;Jonathan Ciurlanti ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Shahriari ,&nbsp;Divyae Mittal ,&nbsp;Evdokia Stavridou ,&nbsp;Anna Silva ,&nbsp;Michele Palmieri ,&nbsp;Stefano Pampanin ,&nbsp;Francesco Petrini ,&nbsp;Mauro Overend","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The built environment is vulnerable to climate-induced extreme events and natural disasters, which are repeatedly exposing communities to severe consequences and market disruptions. In response, the construction industry is developing resilient technologies for buildings, but the proposed solutions are often not cost-effective, rarely eco-friendly and typically fail to address multiple hazards present in many locations. These shortcomings stem from the absence of a clearly defined framework for quantifying holistic multi-hazard resilience. As a result, investment decisions are ill-informed and technical solutions are sub-optimal. This paper redresses this issue by proposing quantitative indicators and introducing the Resilience Readiness Levels to assess the resilience of buildings, considering multi-domain factors (physical, social, economic, environmental) in single or multi-hazard contexts (heat, seismic, wind, flood). The proposed resilience indices and calculation methods are based on a diverse set of scientific literature and real-world practices, and are demonstrated on Dutch and Italian urban blocks with different local hazards and building layouts. The results show that the multi-domain resilience approach can support informed early-stage building design and retrofit decision-making for single hazards, while aiding prioritization and intervention planning for improving building disaster preparedness in multi-hazard scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience Readiness Levels for buildings: Establishing multi-hazard resilience metrics and rating systems\",\"authors\":\"Simona Bianchi ,&nbsp;Michele Matteoni ,&nbsp;Kyujin Kim ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Koniari ,&nbsp;Kyra Koning ,&nbsp;Romulus Costache ,&nbsp;Nicu Ciobotaru ,&nbsp;Alessandra Luna-Navarro ,&nbsp;Zhikai Peng ,&nbsp;Jonathan Ciurlanti ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Shahriari ,&nbsp;Divyae Mittal ,&nbsp;Evdokia Stavridou ,&nbsp;Anna Silva ,&nbsp;Michele Palmieri ,&nbsp;Stefano Pampanin ,&nbsp;Francesco Petrini ,&nbsp;Mauro Overend\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The built environment is vulnerable to climate-induced extreme events and natural disasters, which are repeatedly exposing communities to severe consequences and market disruptions. In response, the construction industry is developing resilient technologies for buildings, but the proposed solutions are often not cost-effective, rarely eco-friendly and typically fail to address multiple hazards present in many locations. These shortcomings stem from the absence of a clearly defined framework for quantifying holistic multi-hazard resilience. As a result, investment decisions are ill-informed and technical solutions are sub-optimal. This paper redresses this issue by proposing quantitative indicators and introducing the Resilience Readiness Levels to assess the resilience of buildings, considering multi-domain factors (physical, social, economic, environmental) in single or multi-hazard contexts (heat, seismic, wind, flood). The proposed resilience indices and calculation methods are based on a diverse set of scientific literature and real-world practices, and are demonstrated on Dutch and Italian urban blocks with different local hazards and building layouts. The results show that the multi-domain resilience approach can support informed early-stage building design and retrofit decision-making for single hazards, while aiding prioritization and intervention planning for improving building disaster preparedness in multi-hazard scenarios.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005709\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005709","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑环境很容易受到气候引起的极端事件和自然灾害的影响,这些事件一再使社区面临严重后果和市场中断。作为回应,建筑行业正在为建筑开发弹性技术,但提出的解决方案往往不具有成本效益,很少环保,并且通常无法解决许多地方存在的多种危害。这些缺点源于缺乏一个明确界定的框架来量化整体的多灾害复原力。因此,投资决策是不明智的,技术解决方案是次优的。本文通过提出定量指标和引入弹性准备水平来评估建筑物的弹性,在单一或多灾害环境(热、地震、风、洪水)中考虑多领域因素(物理、社会、经济、环境),解决了这个问题。提出的弹性指数和计算方法基于多种科学文献和现实世界的实践,并在荷兰和意大利具有不同当地灾害和建筑布局的城市街区中进行了演示。结果表明,多领域弹性方法可以支持针对单一灾害的早期明智的建筑设计和改造决策,同时有助于在多灾害情景下提高建筑备灾能力的优先级和干预规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience Readiness Levels for buildings: Establishing multi-hazard resilience metrics and rating systems
The built environment is vulnerable to climate-induced extreme events and natural disasters, which are repeatedly exposing communities to severe consequences and market disruptions. In response, the construction industry is developing resilient technologies for buildings, but the proposed solutions are often not cost-effective, rarely eco-friendly and typically fail to address multiple hazards present in many locations. These shortcomings stem from the absence of a clearly defined framework for quantifying holistic multi-hazard resilience. As a result, investment decisions are ill-informed and technical solutions are sub-optimal. This paper redresses this issue by proposing quantitative indicators and introducing the Resilience Readiness Levels to assess the resilience of buildings, considering multi-domain factors (physical, social, economic, environmental) in single or multi-hazard contexts (heat, seismic, wind, flood). The proposed resilience indices and calculation methods are based on a diverse set of scientific literature and real-world practices, and are demonstrated on Dutch and Italian urban blocks with different local hazards and building layouts. The results show that the multi-domain resilience approach can support informed early-stage building design and retrofit decision-making for single hazards, while aiding prioritization and intervention planning for improving building disaster preparedness in multi-hazard scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信