娱乐的遗产?:对杰克逊,MS政府常规失败的看法

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Adam M. Straub , Liesel A. Ritchie , Duane A. Gill , Andrew S. Fullerton , Erin Boyle , Thomas M. Kersen
{"title":"娱乐的遗产?:对杰克逊,MS政府常规失败的看法","authors":"Adam M. Straub ,&nbsp;Liesel A. Ritchie ,&nbsp;Duane A. Gill ,&nbsp;Andrew S. Fullerton ,&nbsp;Erin Boyle ,&nbsp;Thomas M. Kersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In late August of 2022, Jackson, MS experienced severe flooding leaving approximately 150,000 without access to drinking water. Compounding this acute event is a decades long water crisis, often attributed to government neglect and mismanagement of water services. The chronic technological disaster (water crisis) worsened by a significant acute hazard event (the 2022 flood) in a place that regularly experiences flooding (persistent acute hazard events) provides a context amenable to investigate the nuances of the concept of recreancy—loosely understood as perceptions of the failure of an institution(s) to fulfill the obligations entrusted to them by the public. We ask: Do residents in Jackson <em>expect</em> governmental failure during environmental crises? A survey of 511 residents measured attitudes toward local government in the context of four dimensions of recreancy—responsibility, effectiveness, confidence, and trust. These dimensions were analyzed to understand how perceptions of local government affect resident confidence that water quality would improve in the future. Analysis finds two facets of recreancy, trust and confidence, held strong associative relationships with confidence that water quality will improve in the future. These findings suggest that, despite historical mismanagement of water services, residents are divided in their optimism about future water quality. This study contributes to emerging literatures focused on compound disasters and provides a nuanced understanding of public valuation of institutions charged with safeguarding public safety and health during crises. This study also continues the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological study of the role of institutions in hazard risk production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105756"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A legacy of recreancy?: Perceptions of routinized governmental failure in Jackson, MS\",\"authors\":\"Adam M. Straub ,&nbsp;Liesel A. Ritchie ,&nbsp;Duane A. Gill ,&nbsp;Andrew S. Fullerton ,&nbsp;Erin Boyle ,&nbsp;Thomas M. Kersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In late August of 2022, Jackson, MS experienced severe flooding leaving approximately 150,000 without access to drinking water. Compounding this acute event is a decades long water crisis, often attributed to government neglect and mismanagement of water services. The chronic technological disaster (water crisis) worsened by a significant acute hazard event (the 2022 flood) in a place that regularly experiences flooding (persistent acute hazard events) provides a context amenable to investigate the nuances of the concept of recreancy—loosely understood as perceptions of the failure of an institution(s) to fulfill the obligations entrusted to them by the public. We ask: Do residents in Jackson <em>expect</em> governmental failure during environmental crises? A survey of 511 residents measured attitudes toward local government in the context of four dimensions of recreancy—responsibility, effectiveness, confidence, and trust. These dimensions were analyzed to understand how perceptions of local government affect resident confidence that water quality would improve in the future. Analysis finds two facets of recreancy, trust and confidence, held strong associative relationships with confidence that water quality will improve in the future. These findings suggest that, despite historical mismanagement of water services, residents are divided in their optimism about future water quality. This study contributes to emerging literatures focused on compound disasters and provides a nuanced understanding of public valuation of institutions charged with safeguarding public safety and health during crises. This study also continues the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological study of the role of institutions in hazard risk production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005801\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005801","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年8月下旬,密西西比州杰克逊市经历了严重的洪水,导致大约15万人无法获得饮用水。使这一严重事件更加复杂的是长达数十年的水危机,这通常归因于政府对水服务的忽视和管理不善。在一个经常经历洪水(持续的急性灾害事件)的地方,一场重大的急性灾害事件(2022年的洪水)加剧了慢性技术灾难(水危机),这为调查休闲概念的细微差别提供了一个背景——粗略地理解为对一个机构未能履行公众委托给他们的义务的看法。我们的问题是:杰克逊的居民期望政府在环境危机中失败吗?一项对511名居民的调查从四个方面衡量了他们对地方政府的态度——责任、效率、信心和信任。对这些维度进行分析,以了解地方政府的看法如何影响居民对未来水质改善的信心。分析发现娱乐的两个方面,信任和信心,与未来水质会改善的信心有很强的关联关系。这些发现表明,尽管历史上供水服务管理不善,但居民对未来水质的乐观态度存在分歧。本研究为关注复合灾害的新兴文献做出了贡献,并对危机期间负责保障公共安全和健康的机构的公众评估提供了细致入微的理解。本研究还继续对机构在灾害风险产生中的作用进行概念、理论和方法上的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A legacy of recreancy?: Perceptions of routinized governmental failure in Jackson, MS
In late August of 2022, Jackson, MS experienced severe flooding leaving approximately 150,000 without access to drinking water. Compounding this acute event is a decades long water crisis, often attributed to government neglect and mismanagement of water services. The chronic technological disaster (water crisis) worsened by a significant acute hazard event (the 2022 flood) in a place that regularly experiences flooding (persistent acute hazard events) provides a context amenable to investigate the nuances of the concept of recreancy—loosely understood as perceptions of the failure of an institution(s) to fulfill the obligations entrusted to them by the public. We ask: Do residents in Jackson expect governmental failure during environmental crises? A survey of 511 residents measured attitudes toward local government in the context of four dimensions of recreancy—responsibility, effectiveness, confidence, and trust. These dimensions were analyzed to understand how perceptions of local government affect resident confidence that water quality would improve in the future. Analysis finds two facets of recreancy, trust and confidence, held strong associative relationships with confidence that water quality will improve in the future. These findings suggest that, despite historical mismanagement of water services, residents are divided in their optimism about future water quality. This study contributes to emerging literatures focused on compound disasters and provides a nuanced understanding of public valuation of institutions charged with safeguarding public safety and health during crises. This study also continues the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological study of the role of institutions in hazard risk production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信