在国内扮演帝国:20世纪40年代荷兰流行的殖民地缘政治

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Xavier Guillaume , Jesse van Amelsvoort
{"title":"在国内扮演帝国:20世纪40年代荷兰流行的殖民地缘政治","authors":"Xavier Guillaume ,&nbsp;Jesse van Amelsvoort","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How is the geopolitical imaginary of colonial spaces produced in popular culture? This question is at the heart of this contribution which seeks to analyse how board games, as a popular culture artefact, are a venue to research the modes by which such spaces are not only represented but also 'at play’. Games are a window to people's geopolitical imaginaries and practices not only through games' representations and imaginaries, but also their level of embeddedness and acceptance. Our article focuses on the social semiotics of a Dutch board game commercialised in the early 1940s – <em>Het Beursspel</em> [The Stock-Exchange Game] – and how its visuality and gameplay helps us to bring to the fore a central aspect of the still very little-known Dutch people's representations and engagements about the Dutch empire. The ‘empire at home’ was strongly internalized and taken-for-granted as a natural extension of the Netherlands as part of an imperial globalised political economy, even in a time when the Netherlands itself and its ‘Oost’ (contemporary Indonesia) were occupied by the Axis forces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103404"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Playing empire at home: Het Beursspel and Dutch popular colonial geopolitics in the 1940s\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Guillaume ,&nbsp;Jesse van Amelsvoort\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>How is the geopolitical imaginary of colonial spaces produced in popular culture? This question is at the heart of this contribution which seeks to analyse how board games, as a popular culture artefact, are a venue to research the modes by which such spaces are not only represented but also 'at play’. Games are a window to people's geopolitical imaginaries and practices not only through games' representations and imaginaries, but also their level of embeddedness and acceptance. Our article focuses on the social semiotics of a Dutch board game commercialised in the early 1940s – <em>Het Beursspel</em> [The Stock-Exchange Game] – and how its visuality and gameplay helps us to bring to the fore a central aspect of the still very little-known Dutch people's representations and engagements about the Dutch empire. The ‘empire at home’ was strongly internalized and taken-for-granted as a natural extension of the Netherlands as part of an imperial globalised political economy, even in a time when the Netherlands itself and its ‘Oost’ (contemporary Indonesia) were occupied by the Axis forces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Geography\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825001362\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825001362","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

殖民空间的地缘政治想象是如何在大众文化中产生的?这个问题是这篇文章的核心,它试图分析桌游作为一种流行文化的人工制品,如何成为研究这种空间不仅是表现形式,而且是“游戏”模式的场所。游戏是人们地缘政治想象和实践的窗口,不仅通过游戏的表征和想象,而且通过它们的嵌入和接受程度。我们的文章关注的是20世纪40年代早期商业化的荷兰桌游《Het Beursspel》(股票交易游戏)的社会符号学,以及它的视觉效果和可玩性如何帮助我们突出了仍然鲜为人知的荷兰人对荷兰帝国的表现和参与的核心方面。“本土帝国”被强烈内化,被视为荷兰作为帝国全球化政治经济一部分的自然延伸,即使在荷兰本身及其“Oost”(当代印度尼西亚)被轴心国占领的时候也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Playing empire at home: Het Beursspel and Dutch popular colonial geopolitics in the 1940s
How is the geopolitical imaginary of colonial spaces produced in popular culture? This question is at the heart of this contribution which seeks to analyse how board games, as a popular culture artefact, are a venue to research the modes by which such spaces are not only represented but also 'at play’. Games are a window to people's geopolitical imaginaries and practices not only through games' representations and imaginaries, but also their level of embeddedness and acceptance. Our article focuses on the social semiotics of a Dutch board game commercialised in the early 1940s – Het Beursspel [The Stock-Exchange Game] – and how its visuality and gameplay helps us to bring to the fore a central aspect of the still very little-known Dutch people's representations and engagements about the Dutch empire. The ‘empire at home’ was strongly internalized and taken-for-granted as a natural extension of the Netherlands as part of an imperial globalised political economy, even in a time when the Netherlands itself and its ‘Oost’ (contemporary Indonesia) were occupied by the Axis forces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信