{"title":"热解多样性与生物多样性的关系","authors":"Anthony E. Fernando , Michael A. McCarthy","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paradigm that \"pyrodiversity begets biodiversity\" postulates that biodiversity increases as the diversity of the fire regime, often measured by times since fire, in a region increases. The pyrodiversity paradigm was derived from a “thought experiment” rather than from explicit theory based on fire ecology and species’ responses to fire regimes. Empirical studies report a diverse range of responses, with researchers suggesting that this diversity can be explained by extra details such as the nuances of individual studies or the complexity of fire regimes and species’ responses. We explore the relationship between pyrodiversity and biodiversity by developing a simple model in which species respond only to time since fire, and calculate biodiversity metrics in landscapes exposed to different distributions of fire intervals. Biodiversity and pyrodiversity are defined in this theoretical framework, with a wide range of relationships between pyrodiversity and biodiversity predicted, even for this simple model in which time since fire is the only driving variable. Biodiversity can increase or decrease with pyrodiversity in different circumstances. An even wider range of relationships between biodiversity and pyrodiversity would be expected in real fire ecology situations that are more complex. Our theoretical analysis shows that inconsistent empirical support for the paradigm “pyrodiversity begets biodiversity” is unsurprising, and that a diversity of relationships between pyrodiversity and biodiversity is expected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"510 ","pages":"Article 111294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between pyrodiversity and biodiversity\",\"authors\":\"Anthony E. Fernando , Michael A. McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The paradigm that \\\"pyrodiversity begets biodiversity\\\" postulates that biodiversity increases as the diversity of the fire regime, often measured by times since fire, in a region increases. The pyrodiversity paradigm was derived from a “thought experiment” rather than from explicit theory based on fire ecology and species’ responses to fire regimes. Empirical studies report a diverse range of responses, with researchers suggesting that this diversity can be explained by extra details such as the nuances of individual studies or the complexity of fire regimes and species’ responses. We explore the relationship between pyrodiversity and biodiversity by developing a simple model in which species respond only to time since fire, and calculate biodiversity metrics in landscapes exposed to different distributions of fire intervals. Biodiversity and pyrodiversity are defined in this theoretical framework, with a wide range of relationships between pyrodiversity and biodiversity predicted, even for this simple model in which time since fire is the only driving variable. Biodiversity can increase or decrease with pyrodiversity in different circumstances. An even wider range of relationships between biodiversity and pyrodiversity would be expected in real fire ecology situations that are more complex. Our theoretical analysis shows that inconsistent empirical support for the paradigm “pyrodiversity begets biodiversity” is unsurprising, and that a diversity of relationships between pyrodiversity and biodiversity is expected.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"volume\":\"510 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025002807\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025002807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relationship between pyrodiversity and biodiversity
The paradigm that "pyrodiversity begets biodiversity" postulates that biodiversity increases as the diversity of the fire regime, often measured by times since fire, in a region increases. The pyrodiversity paradigm was derived from a “thought experiment” rather than from explicit theory based on fire ecology and species’ responses to fire regimes. Empirical studies report a diverse range of responses, with researchers suggesting that this diversity can be explained by extra details such as the nuances of individual studies or the complexity of fire regimes and species’ responses. We explore the relationship between pyrodiversity and biodiversity by developing a simple model in which species respond only to time since fire, and calculate biodiversity metrics in landscapes exposed to different distributions of fire intervals. Biodiversity and pyrodiversity are defined in this theoretical framework, with a wide range of relationships between pyrodiversity and biodiversity predicted, even for this simple model in which time since fire is the only driving variable. Biodiversity can increase or decrease with pyrodiversity in different circumstances. An even wider range of relationships between biodiversity and pyrodiversity would be expected in real fire ecology situations that are more complex. Our theoretical analysis shows that inconsistent empirical support for the paradigm “pyrodiversity begets biodiversity” is unsurprising, and that a diversity of relationships between pyrodiversity and biodiversity is expected.
期刊介绍:
The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).