2级PSA安全壳失效模式的概率估计:现实的方法和风险影响

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kwang-Il Ahn
{"title":"2级PSA安全壳失效模式的概率估计:现实的方法和风险影响","authors":"Kwang-Il Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.net.2025.103847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A realistic assessment of the probabilities associated with containment failure modes—such as leaks and ruptures—can significantly influence the quality and credibility of Level 2 probabilistic safety assessments (PSAs) for nuclear power plants (NPPs). From this perspective, this paper provides technical backgrounds on the impact of two different approaches to estimating these probabilities: the Rupture-Before-Leak (RBL) assumption, adopted in many existing Level 2 PSAs, and the more realistic Leak-Before-Break (LBB) assumption. Fundamentally, both approaches rely on probabilistic fragility curves developed independently for two distinct failure modes—more specifically leaks and ruptures, whose nominal sizes are predefined. In some situations, a leakage mode smaller than the leak size may be explicitly considered to more realistically assess the Cs-137 100 TBq release-related probabilistic safety goals. The findings from relevant case studies are presented along with key insights, particularly regarding to their implications for Level 2 safety and performance goals such as Large (Early) Release Frequencies (LERF/LRF), and the Cs-137 risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19272,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","volume":"57 12","pages":"Article 103847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic estimation of containment failure modes in Level 2 PSA: Realistic approach and risk implications\",\"authors\":\"Kwang-Il Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.net.2025.103847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A realistic assessment of the probabilities associated with containment failure modes—such as leaks and ruptures—can significantly influence the quality and credibility of Level 2 probabilistic safety assessments (PSAs) for nuclear power plants (NPPs). From this perspective, this paper provides technical backgrounds on the impact of two different approaches to estimating these probabilities: the Rupture-Before-Leak (RBL) assumption, adopted in many existing Level 2 PSAs, and the more realistic Leak-Before-Break (LBB) assumption. Fundamentally, both approaches rely on probabilistic fragility curves developed independently for two distinct failure modes—more specifically leaks and ruptures, whose nominal sizes are predefined. In some situations, a leakage mode smaller than the leak size may be explicitly considered to more realistically assess the Cs-137 100 TBq release-related probabilistic safety goals. The findings from relevant case studies are presented along with key insights, particularly regarding to their implications for Level 2 safety and performance goals such as Large (Early) Release Frequencies (LERF/LRF), and the Cs-137 risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"57 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 103847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573325004152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573325004152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对与安全壳失效模式(如泄漏和破裂)相关的概率进行现实评估,可以显著影响核电站(NPPs)的2级概率安全评估(psa)的质量和可信度。从这个角度来看,本文提供了评估这些概率的两种不同方法的影响的技术背景:在许多现有的2级psa中采用的泄漏前破裂(RBL)假设,以及更现实的泄漏前破裂(LBB)假设。从根本上说,这两种方法都依赖于为两种不同的破坏模式(更具体地说是泄漏和破裂)独立开发的概率脆性曲线,其标称尺寸是预定义的。在某些情况下,可以明确考虑小于泄漏尺寸的泄漏模式,以便更现实地评估Cs-137 100 TBq泄漏相关的概率安全目标。相关案例研究的结果与关键见解一起呈现,特别是关于它们对2级安全和性能目标的影响,如大(早期)释放频率(LERF/LRF)和Cs-137风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic estimation of containment failure modes in Level 2 PSA: Realistic approach and risk implications
A realistic assessment of the probabilities associated with containment failure modes—such as leaks and ruptures—can significantly influence the quality and credibility of Level 2 probabilistic safety assessments (PSAs) for nuclear power plants (NPPs). From this perspective, this paper provides technical backgrounds on the impact of two different approaches to estimating these probabilities: the Rupture-Before-Leak (RBL) assumption, adopted in many existing Level 2 PSAs, and the more realistic Leak-Before-Break (LBB) assumption. Fundamentally, both approaches rely on probabilistic fragility curves developed independently for two distinct failure modes—more specifically leaks and ruptures, whose nominal sizes are predefined. In some situations, a leakage mode smaller than the leak size may be explicitly considered to more realistically assess the Cs-137 100 TBq release-related probabilistic safety goals. The findings from relevant case studies are presented along with key insights, particularly regarding to their implications for Level 2 safety and performance goals such as Large (Early) Release Frequencies (LERF/LRF), and the Cs-137 risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Nuclear Engineering and Technology 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
431
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Technology (NET), an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society (KNS), publishes peer-reviewed papers on original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear science and technology. NET bimonthly publishes original articles, reviews, and technical notes. The journal is listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of Thomson Reuters. NET covers all fields for peaceful utilization of nuclear energy and radiation as follows: 1) Reactor Physics 2) Thermal Hydraulics 3) Nuclear Safety 4) Nuclear I&C 5) Nuclear Physics, Fusion, and Laser Technology 6) Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Radioactive Waste Management 7) Nuclear Fuel and Reactor Materials 8) Radiation Application 9) Radiation Protection 10) Nuclear Structural Analysis and Plant Management & Maintenance 11) Nuclear Policy, Economics, and Human Resource Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信