基于高维函数边界搜索的自动驾驶系统偏差鲁棒性测试

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Yunwei Li , Siyu Wu , Anran Wang , Lan Yang , Hong Wang , Jun Li , Chaosheng Huang
{"title":"基于高维函数边界搜索的自动驾驶系统偏差鲁棒性测试","authors":"Yunwei Li ,&nbsp;Siyu Wu ,&nbsp;Anran Wang ,&nbsp;Lan Yang ,&nbsp;Hong Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Li ,&nbsp;Chaosheng Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Testing and evaluation are essential for verifying the safety of the intended function (SOTIF) of autonomous driving systems (ADS), which focuses on estimating the system’s functional boundaries through a limited set of tests to assess its safe operational range. To achieve this, a series of valuable safety-margin scenarios must be designed as test cases. However, scenario testing faces the dilemma of the curse of dimensionality and the requirements for test coverage. Consequently, the construction and selection of test cases become significant challenges. Moreover, due to the black-box nature of the system under test (SUT), surrogate models are often introduced during the scenario generation process, which can introduce model deviation relative to the actual system and potentially lead to ineffective test scenarios as well as incorrect estimation of system functional boundaries (SFB). To address these challenges, an efficient framework for generating high-dimensional safety-margin scenarios and tracking SFB of SUT is proposed, which utilizes a baseline surrogate model to generate a diverse and comprehensive library of safety-margin test scenarios through a multi-population genetic algorithm (MPGA). Additionally, a System Functional Boundary Tracking (SFBT) module is employed to compensate for the deviation between the baseline surrogate model and the actual SUT, thereby adaptively generalizing the library of critical scenarios to estimate its high-dimensional functional boundaries. This framework will potentially assist in the testing and validation of the Operational Design Domain (ODD) for ADS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108156"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-dimensional functional boundaries search for deviation-robust testing of autonomous driving system\",\"authors\":\"Yunwei Li ,&nbsp;Siyu Wu ,&nbsp;Anran Wang ,&nbsp;Lan Yang ,&nbsp;Hong Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Li ,&nbsp;Chaosheng Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Testing and evaluation are essential for verifying the safety of the intended function (SOTIF) of autonomous driving systems (ADS), which focuses on estimating the system’s functional boundaries through a limited set of tests to assess its safe operational range. To achieve this, a series of valuable safety-margin scenarios must be designed as test cases. However, scenario testing faces the dilemma of the curse of dimensionality and the requirements for test coverage. Consequently, the construction and selection of test cases become significant challenges. Moreover, due to the black-box nature of the system under test (SUT), surrogate models are often introduced during the scenario generation process, which can introduce model deviation relative to the actual system and potentially lead to ineffective test scenarios as well as incorrect estimation of system functional boundaries (SFB). To address these challenges, an efficient framework for generating high-dimensional safety-margin scenarios and tracking SFB of SUT is proposed, which utilizes a baseline surrogate model to generate a diverse and comprehensive library of safety-margin test scenarios through a multi-population genetic algorithm (MPGA). Additionally, a System Functional Boundary Tracking (SFBT) module is employed to compensate for the deviation between the baseline surrogate model and the actual SUT, thereby adaptively generalizing the library of critical scenarios to estimate its high-dimensional functional boundaries. This framework will potentially assist in the testing and validation of the Operational Design Domain (ODD) for ADS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525002428\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525002428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测试和评估对于验证自动驾驶系统(ADS)的预期功能(SOTIF)的安全性至关重要,其重点是通过一组有限的测试来评估系统的功能边界,以评估其安全运行范围。为了实现这一点,必须将一系列有价值的安全边际场景设计为测试用例。然而,场景测试面临着维度诅咒和测试覆盖需求的困境。因此,测试用例的构建和选择成为重要的挑战。此外,由于被测系统(SUT)的黑箱性质,在场景生成过程中经常引入代理模型,这可能会引入相对于实际系统的模型偏差,并可能导致无效的测试场景以及对系统功能边界(SFB)的不正确估计。为了应对这些挑战,本文提出了一种高效的框架,用于生成高维安全裕度场景并跟踪SUT的SFB,该框架利用基线代理模型通过多种群遗传算法(MPGA)生成多样化和全面的安全裕度测试场景库。此外,采用系统功能边界跟踪(System Functional Boundary Tracking, SFBT)模块补偿基线代理模型与实际SUT之间的偏差,从而自适应泛化关键场景库,估计其高维功能边界。该框架将潜在地有助于ADS的操作设计域(ODD)的测试和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-dimensional functional boundaries search for deviation-robust testing of autonomous driving system
Testing and evaluation are essential for verifying the safety of the intended function (SOTIF) of autonomous driving systems (ADS), which focuses on estimating the system’s functional boundaries through a limited set of tests to assess its safe operational range. To achieve this, a series of valuable safety-margin scenarios must be designed as test cases. However, scenario testing faces the dilemma of the curse of dimensionality and the requirements for test coverage. Consequently, the construction and selection of test cases become significant challenges. Moreover, due to the black-box nature of the system under test (SUT), surrogate models are often introduced during the scenario generation process, which can introduce model deviation relative to the actual system and potentially lead to ineffective test scenarios as well as incorrect estimation of system functional boundaries (SFB). To address these challenges, an efficient framework for generating high-dimensional safety-margin scenarios and tracking SFB of SUT is proposed, which utilizes a baseline surrogate model to generate a diverse and comprehensive library of safety-margin test scenarios through a multi-population genetic algorithm (MPGA). Additionally, a System Functional Boundary Tracking (SFBT) module is employed to compensate for the deviation between the baseline surrogate model and the actual SUT, thereby adaptively generalizing the library of critical scenarios to estimate its high-dimensional functional boundaries. This framework will potentially assist in the testing and validation of the Operational Design Domain (ODD) for ADS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信