Akemi Hara , Tetsuya Tanimoto , Piotr Ozieranski , James Larkin , Michioki Endo , Hiroaki Saito , Akihiko Ozaki
{"title":"量化制药和医疗器械行业-医生的财务关系:2019年至2021年日本医学协会领导层的酬金支付分析","authors":"Akemi Hara , Tetsuya Tanimoto , Piotr Ozieranski , James Larkin , Michioki Endo , Hiroaki Saito , Akihiko Ozaki","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the extent and distribution of pharmaceutical and medical device industry honorarium payments to medical association leadership, enhancing our understanding of industry-physician financial ties in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of publicly disclosed payment data from pharmaceutical companies affiliated with the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and medical device companies affiliated with the Medical Devices Network. Data covered honorarium payments for speaking, writing, and consulting to board members of 18 major professional medical associations from 2019 to 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 399 executive board members, 373 (93.5 %) received payments totaling $15.99 million. The median payment per member over the three years was $22,529, (interquartile range [IQR], $7230.8–$57,223.9). Payments were concentrated, with four professional medical associations—representing Internal Medicine ($2.97 million), Ophthalmology ($1.78 million), Dermatology ($1.78 million), and Urology ($1.87 million)—accounting for 52.5 % of the total. Surgical specialties received a higher proportion of payments from medical device companies, while non-surgical specialties – pharmaceutical companies. Payments declined in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, recovering by 2021. None of the 18 associations' leadership publicly disclosed their board members' financial ties.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found extensive and concentrated ties between industry and medical association leadership in Japan, with the pharmaceutical and medical device sectors each displaying distinctive payment patterns. The substantial scale of payments and limited transparency displayed by the association highlight the urgent need for legally mandated disclosure, including specialty-specific solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 6","pages":"Article 101081"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying pharmaceutical and medical device industry-physician financial ties: An analysis of honorarium payments to Japanese medical association leadership between 2019 and 2021\",\"authors\":\"Akemi Hara , Tetsuya Tanimoto , Piotr Ozieranski , James Larkin , Michioki Endo , Hiroaki Saito , Akihiko Ozaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the extent and distribution of pharmaceutical and medical device industry honorarium payments to medical association leadership, enhancing our understanding of industry-physician financial ties in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of publicly disclosed payment data from pharmaceutical companies affiliated with the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and medical device companies affiliated with the Medical Devices Network. Data covered honorarium payments for speaking, writing, and consulting to board members of 18 major professional medical associations from 2019 to 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 399 executive board members, 373 (93.5 %) received payments totaling $15.99 million. The median payment per member over the three years was $22,529, (interquartile range [IQR], $7230.8–$57,223.9). Payments were concentrated, with four professional medical associations—representing Internal Medicine ($2.97 million), Ophthalmology ($1.78 million), Dermatology ($1.78 million), and Urology ($1.87 million)—accounting for 52.5 % of the total. Surgical specialties received a higher proportion of payments from medical device companies, while non-surgical specialties – pharmaceutical companies. Payments declined in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, recovering by 2021. None of the 18 associations' leadership publicly disclosed their board members' financial ties.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found extensive and concentrated ties between industry and medical association leadership in Japan, with the pharmaceutical and medical device sectors each displaying distinctive payment patterns. The substantial scale of payments and limited transparency displayed by the association highlight the urgent need for legally mandated disclosure, including specialty-specific solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725001091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725001091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying pharmaceutical and medical device industry-physician financial ties: An analysis of honorarium payments to Japanese medical association leadership between 2019 and 2021
Objective
To assess the extent and distribution of pharmaceutical and medical device industry honorarium payments to medical association leadership, enhancing our understanding of industry-physician financial ties in Japan.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of publicly disclosed payment data from pharmaceutical companies affiliated with the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and medical device companies affiliated with the Medical Devices Network. Data covered honorarium payments for speaking, writing, and consulting to board members of 18 major professional medical associations from 2019 to 2021.
Results
Of the 399 executive board members, 373 (93.5 %) received payments totaling $15.99 million. The median payment per member over the three years was $22,529, (interquartile range [IQR], $7230.8–$57,223.9). Payments were concentrated, with four professional medical associations—representing Internal Medicine ($2.97 million), Ophthalmology ($1.78 million), Dermatology ($1.78 million), and Urology ($1.87 million)—accounting for 52.5 % of the total. Surgical specialties received a higher proportion of payments from medical device companies, while non-surgical specialties – pharmaceutical companies. Payments declined in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, recovering by 2021. None of the 18 associations' leadership publicly disclosed their board members' financial ties.
Conclusions
We found extensive and concentrated ties between industry and medical association leadership in Japan, with the pharmaceutical and medical device sectors each displaying distinctive payment patterns. The substantial scale of payments and limited transparency displayed by the association highlight the urgent need for legally mandated disclosure, including specialty-specific solutions.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics