{"title":"当信息丰富时,关键的忽视对民主是有害的","authors":"Stephan Lewandowsky , Ralph Hertwig","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We live in a world of democratic backsliding, and simultaneously, in a world of information abundance. Initial expectations that the access to vast amounts of information provided by the Internet will facilitate democracy have been disappointed. We highlight how information abundance can be detrimental to democracy, from triggering misinformation cascades to generating coping strategies that result in reduced political accountability. We propose that information abundance is best met through critical ignoring; that is, the strategic decision not to consume certain content. We present new techniques of critical ignoring that permit people not only to cope with information abundance but also to avoid contributing to democratic decline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102128"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical ignoring when information abundance is detrimental to democracy\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Lewandowsky , Ralph Hertwig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We live in a world of democratic backsliding, and simultaneously, in a world of information abundance. Initial expectations that the access to vast amounts of information provided by the Internet will facilitate democracy have been disappointed. We highlight how information abundance can be detrimental to democracy, from triggering misinformation cascades to generating coping strategies that result in reduced political accountability. We propose that information abundance is best met through critical ignoring; that is, the strategic decision not to consume certain content. We present new techniques of critical ignoring that permit people not only to cope with information abundance but also to avoid contributing to democratic decline.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical ignoring when information abundance is detrimental to democracy
We live in a world of democratic backsliding, and simultaneously, in a world of information abundance. Initial expectations that the access to vast amounts of information provided by the Internet will facilitate democracy have been disappointed. We highlight how information abundance can be detrimental to democracy, from triggering misinformation cascades to generating coping strategies that result in reduced political accountability. We propose that information abundance is best met through critical ignoring; that is, the strategic decision not to consume certain content. We present new techniques of critical ignoring that permit people not only to cope with information abundance but also to avoid contributing to democratic decline.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology