利与弊:消费者对回收包装橙汁的质量期望

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Madita Finke, Janine Macht, Monika Hartmann
{"title":"利与弊:消费者对回收包装橙汁的质量期望","authors":"Madita Finke,&nbsp;Janine Macht,&nbsp;Monika Hartmann","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Packaging contributes significantly to global waste production. To reduce emissions and waste, a transition to a more sustainable approach, the circular economy, is being promoted. This approach focuses on strategies such as reuse and recycling. Companies have the option to display a label indicating the recyclate percentage, though its impact on consumer choice remains uncertain. This study investigated how such a label affects consumers' expectations of the quality, safety, taste, and sustainability of orange juice. An online survey with 1080 German consumers using a between-subjects design was conducted: Each group saw a different picture of orange juice in a PET bottle: either with a 25 % recyclate label, a 100 % recyclate label, or no label. Results showed a halo effect of labelling, i.e., a recyclate label indicating the percentage of recyclate used in a PET bottle improves consumers' expectations of orange juice. The exact recycled content does not significantly affect quality and safety expectations but does impact sustainability perceptions. Furthermore, expected safety, expected taste, and expected sustainability were found to mediate the effect of a recyclate label on expected quality. A moderating effect of environmental concern was observed, i.e. participants with higher environmental concern expect orange juice with a recyclate label to be more sustainable. Thus, communicating recyclate content to consumers appears beneficial, and exceeding legal requirements may be advantageous for companies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 105647"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefit or harm: Consumers' quality expectation of orange juice in recycled packaging\",\"authors\":\"Madita Finke,&nbsp;Janine Macht,&nbsp;Monika Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Packaging contributes significantly to global waste production. To reduce emissions and waste, a transition to a more sustainable approach, the circular economy, is being promoted. This approach focuses on strategies such as reuse and recycling. Companies have the option to display a label indicating the recyclate percentage, though its impact on consumer choice remains uncertain. This study investigated how such a label affects consumers' expectations of the quality, safety, taste, and sustainability of orange juice. An online survey with 1080 German consumers using a between-subjects design was conducted: Each group saw a different picture of orange juice in a PET bottle: either with a 25 % recyclate label, a 100 % recyclate label, or no label. Results showed a halo effect of labelling, i.e., a recyclate label indicating the percentage of recyclate used in a PET bottle improves consumers' expectations of orange juice. The exact recycled content does not significantly affect quality and safety expectations but does impact sustainability perceptions. Furthermore, expected safety, expected taste, and expected sustainability were found to mediate the effect of a recyclate label on expected quality. A moderating effect of environmental concern was observed, i.e. participants with higher environmental concern expect orange juice with a recyclate label to be more sustainable. Thus, communicating recyclate content to consumers appears beneficial, and exceeding legal requirements may be advantageous for companies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002228\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包装对全球废弃物的产生起着重要作用。为了减少排放和浪费,正在推动向更可持续的方式——循环经济的过渡。这种方法侧重于重复使用和再循环等策略。公司可以选择显示显示回收百分比的标签,尽管它对消费者选择的影响仍不确定。这项研究调查了这样的标签如何影响消费者对橙汁的质量、安全、味道和可持续性的期望。一项针对1080名德国消费者的在线调查采用了受试者间设计:每一组都看到PET瓶中橙汁的不同图片:有25%可回收标签、100%可回收标签或没有标签。结果表明,标签的光环效应,即回收标签表明PET瓶中使用的回收百分比提高了消费者对橙汁的期望。确切的回收内容不会显著影响质量和安全预期,但会影响可持续性观念。此外,预期的安全性,预期的味道和预期的可持续性被发现调解回收标签对预期质量的影响。观察到环境关注的调节作用,即环境关注程度较高的参与者期望带有可回收标签的橙汁更具可持续性。因此,向消费者传达可回收的内容似乎是有益的,而超出法律要求可能对公司有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefit or harm: Consumers' quality expectation of orange juice in recycled packaging
Packaging contributes significantly to global waste production. To reduce emissions and waste, a transition to a more sustainable approach, the circular economy, is being promoted. This approach focuses on strategies such as reuse and recycling. Companies have the option to display a label indicating the recyclate percentage, though its impact on consumer choice remains uncertain. This study investigated how such a label affects consumers' expectations of the quality, safety, taste, and sustainability of orange juice. An online survey with 1080 German consumers using a between-subjects design was conducted: Each group saw a different picture of orange juice in a PET bottle: either with a 25 % recyclate label, a 100 % recyclate label, or no label. Results showed a halo effect of labelling, i.e., a recyclate label indicating the percentage of recyclate used in a PET bottle improves consumers' expectations of orange juice. The exact recycled content does not significantly affect quality and safety expectations but does impact sustainability perceptions. Furthermore, expected safety, expected taste, and expected sustainability were found to mediate the effect of a recyclate label on expected quality. A moderating effect of environmental concern was observed, i.e. participants with higher environmental concern expect orange juice with a recyclate label to be more sustainable. Thus, communicating recyclate content to consumers appears beneficial, and exceeding legal requirements may be advantageous for companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信