模糊的边界:元代景德镇罗马桥窑生产系统的复杂性探析

IF 2.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Wenpeng Xu , Dashu Qin , Yanjun Weng , Xianping Gao , Yu Ding
{"title":"模糊的边界:元代景德镇罗马桥窑生产系统的复杂性探析","authors":"Wenpeng Xu ,&nbsp;Dashu Qin ,&nbsp;Yanjun Weng ,&nbsp;Xianping Gao ,&nbsp;Yu Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conceptual framework of attached and independent production has long shaped archaeological studies of ancient craft organization. While this dichotomy is often regarded as an oversimplification, the nuanced variations within ancient craft production systems remain insufficiently explored. This study addresses the complexities of attached production through a case study of the Luomaqiao kiln site in Yuan-dynasty Jingdezhen (1271–1368 CE) —a state-affiliated workshop that produced high-quality porcelain. By integrating high-resolution compositional analysis (LA-ICP-MS) with archaeological and historical evidence, the study examines raw material selection and use, as well as the associated organizational dynamics. Specifically, it identifies three major porcelain styles—egg-white (<em>luanbai</em>), bluish-white (<em>qingbai</em>), and grayish-green (<em>huiqing</em>) glazed porcelain—each produced with geochemically distinct raw materials, reflecting deliberate choices in sourcing and production strategy. Notably, the <em>luanbai</em> porcelains bearing five-clawed dragon motifs—symbols strictly reserved for imperial use—exhibit exceptional chemical purity and homogeneity, suggesting the possible use of the <em>yutu</em> (imperial clay) as described in historical records. However, this special clay was also employed in the production of ordinary <em>luanbai</em> wares, implying that imperial resources were not strictly confined to official products but circulated more broadly within the kiln system. These findings reveal a production system in which the boundaries between attached and independent modes are blurred, reflecting significant artisan agency within a state-controlled framework. Recognizing the duality and fluidity inherent in Yuan-dynasty porcelain production in Jingdezhen underscores the need for more nuanced frameworks that capture the dynamic interplay between state control and artisan agency, thereby offering broader insights for archaeological interpretations of ancient craft production systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blurred boundaries: Exploring the complexity of the production system at the Luomaqiao kiln in Yuan-dynasty Jingdezhen\",\"authors\":\"Wenpeng Xu ,&nbsp;Dashu Qin ,&nbsp;Yanjun Weng ,&nbsp;Xianping Gao ,&nbsp;Yu Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The conceptual framework of attached and independent production has long shaped archaeological studies of ancient craft organization. While this dichotomy is often regarded as an oversimplification, the nuanced variations within ancient craft production systems remain insufficiently explored. This study addresses the complexities of attached production through a case study of the Luomaqiao kiln site in Yuan-dynasty Jingdezhen (1271–1368 CE) —a state-affiliated workshop that produced high-quality porcelain. By integrating high-resolution compositional analysis (LA-ICP-MS) with archaeological and historical evidence, the study examines raw material selection and use, as well as the associated organizational dynamics. Specifically, it identifies three major porcelain styles—egg-white (<em>luanbai</em>), bluish-white (<em>qingbai</em>), and grayish-green (<em>huiqing</em>) glazed porcelain—each produced with geochemically distinct raw materials, reflecting deliberate choices in sourcing and production strategy. Notably, the <em>luanbai</em> porcelains bearing five-clawed dragon motifs—symbols strictly reserved for imperial use—exhibit exceptional chemical purity and homogeneity, suggesting the possible use of the <em>yutu</em> (imperial clay) as described in historical records. However, this special clay was also employed in the production of ordinary <em>luanbai</em> wares, implying that imperial resources were not strictly confined to official products but circulated more broadly within the kiln system. These findings reveal a production system in which the boundaries between attached and independent modes are blurred, reflecting significant artisan agency within a state-controlled framework. Recognizing the duality and fluidity inherent in Yuan-dynasty porcelain production in Jingdezhen underscores the need for more nuanced frameworks that capture the dynamic interplay between state control and artisan agency, thereby offering broader insights for archaeological interpretations of ancient craft production systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325001773\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325001773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

依附生产和独立生产的概念框架长期以来塑造了古代工艺组织的考古研究。虽然这种二分法通常被认为是过于简单化,但古代工艺生产系统中细微的变化仍然没有得到充分的探索。本研究通过对元代景德镇(公元1271-1368年)罗马桥窑遗址的案例研究,解决了附加生产的复杂性,这是一个生产高质量瓷器的国家附属车间。通过将高分辨率成分分析(LA-ICP-MS)与考古和历史证据相结合,该研究考察了原材料的选择和使用,以及相关的组织动态。具体来说,它确定了三种主要的瓷器风格——鸡蛋白(滦白)、青白(青白)和灰绿色(徽青)釉面瓷——每一种都使用不同的地球化学原料生产,反映了采购和生产策略的深思熟虑选择。值得注意的是,带有五爪龙图案的栾白瓷器——这是严格保留给皇家使用的符号——表现出特殊的化学纯度和同质性,表明可能使用了历史记载中描述的玉兔(皇家粘土)。然而,这种特殊的粘土也被用于生产普通的銮白器,这意味着皇家资源并不严格局限于官方产品,而是在窑系统中更广泛地流通。这些发现揭示了一个依附模式和独立模式之间界限模糊的生产系统,反映了国家控制框架内重要的工匠代理。认识到景德镇元代瓷器生产固有的二元性和流动性,强调需要更细致的框架来捕捉国家控制和工匠代理之间的动态相互作用,从而为古代工艺生产系统的考古解释提供更广泛的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blurred boundaries: Exploring the complexity of the production system at the Luomaqiao kiln in Yuan-dynasty Jingdezhen
The conceptual framework of attached and independent production has long shaped archaeological studies of ancient craft organization. While this dichotomy is often regarded as an oversimplification, the nuanced variations within ancient craft production systems remain insufficiently explored. This study addresses the complexities of attached production through a case study of the Luomaqiao kiln site in Yuan-dynasty Jingdezhen (1271–1368 CE) —a state-affiliated workshop that produced high-quality porcelain. By integrating high-resolution compositional analysis (LA-ICP-MS) with archaeological and historical evidence, the study examines raw material selection and use, as well as the associated organizational dynamics. Specifically, it identifies three major porcelain styles—egg-white (luanbai), bluish-white (qingbai), and grayish-green (huiqing) glazed porcelain—each produced with geochemically distinct raw materials, reflecting deliberate choices in sourcing and production strategy. Notably, the luanbai porcelains bearing five-clawed dragon motifs—symbols strictly reserved for imperial use—exhibit exceptional chemical purity and homogeneity, suggesting the possible use of the yutu (imperial clay) as described in historical records. However, this special clay was also employed in the production of ordinary luanbai wares, implying that imperial resources were not strictly confined to official products but circulated more broadly within the kiln system. These findings reveal a production system in which the boundaries between attached and independent modes are blurred, reflecting significant artisan agency within a state-controlled framework. Recognizing the duality and fluidity inherent in Yuan-dynasty porcelain production in Jingdezhen underscores the need for more nuanced frameworks that capture the dynamic interplay between state control and artisan agency, thereby offering broader insights for archaeological interpretations of ancient craft production systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信