{"title":"改善家养狗和猫的寄生虫诊断:对准确和非侵入性技术的需求","authors":"Georgiana Deak, Adriana Györke, Cristina Daniela Pop, Viorica Mircean","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cestode infections in companion animals pose a significant diagnostic challenge due to intermittent egg shedding and the limitations of traditional coproscopic techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of microscopy and PCR in detecting cestodes in dogs and cats, using necropsy as the gold standard.</div><div>A total of 81 animals (46 dogs and 35 cats) were examined by necropsy, with gastrointestinal tracts inspected for cestodes. Fecal samples were collected and analyzed by coproscopy and PCR targeting cestode infections.</div><div>Necropsy identified cestodes in 7 (8.6 %; 95 % CI: 4.3 – 16.8) out of 81 animals: <em>Dipylidium caninum</em> was found in 3 (3.7 %; 95 % CI: 1.3 – 10.3) of animals (1/46 dogs; 2/35 cats), and <em>Hydatigera taeniaeformis</em> in 4 (11.4 %; 95 % CI: 4.5 – 26.0) out of 35 cats. Coproscopy and PCR detected only infection with <em>H. taeniaeformis</em> in 2 (5.7 %; 95 % CI: 1.6 – 18.6), and 3 (8.6 %; 95 CI: 3.0–22.4) cats, respectively., No PCR positives were recorded for <em>D. caninum</em>, despite its presence at necropsy. Overall agreement with necropsy was moderate for both methods (coproscopy k = 0.42; PCR k = 0.58), with higher sensitivity and agreement for <em>Taenia</em> spp. and <em>H. taeniaeformis</em> detection. These findings highlight the poor sensitivity of current non-invasive diagnostic methods for cestodes, particularly <em>D. caninum</em>, and the limited correlation between infection intensity and fecal detection. The study advocates for the urgent need for a commercially available coproantigen test to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 106654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving cestode diagnosis in domestic dogs and cats: the need for accurate and non-invasive techniques\",\"authors\":\"Georgiana Deak, Adriana Györke, Cristina Daniela Pop, Viorica Mircean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cestode infections in companion animals pose a significant diagnostic challenge due to intermittent egg shedding and the limitations of traditional coproscopic techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of microscopy and PCR in detecting cestodes in dogs and cats, using necropsy as the gold standard.</div><div>A total of 81 animals (46 dogs and 35 cats) were examined by necropsy, with gastrointestinal tracts inspected for cestodes. Fecal samples were collected and analyzed by coproscopy and PCR targeting cestode infections.</div><div>Necropsy identified cestodes in 7 (8.6 %; 95 % CI: 4.3 – 16.8) out of 81 animals: <em>Dipylidium caninum</em> was found in 3 (3.7 %; 95 % CI: 1.3 – 10.3) of animals (1/46 dogs; 2/35 cats), and <em>Hydatigera taeniaeformis</em> in 4 (11.4 %; 95 % CI: 4.5 – 26.0) out of 35 cats. Coproscopy and PCR detected only infection with <em>H. taeniaeformis</em> in 2 (5.7 %; 95 % CI: 1.6 – 18.6), and 3 (8.6 %; 95 CI: 3.0–22.4) cats, respectively., No PCR positives were recorded for <em>D. caninum</em>, despite its presence at necropsy. Overall agreement with necropsy was moderate for both methods (coproscopy k = 0.42; PCR k = 0.58), with higher sensitivity and agreement for <em>Taenia</em> spp. and <em>H. taeniaeformis</em> detection. These findings highlight the poor sensitivity of current non-invasive diagnostic methods for cestodes, particularly <em>D. caninum</em>, and the limited correlation between infection intensity and fecal detection. The study advocates for the urgent need for a commercially available coproantigen test to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\"244 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725002399\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725002399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving cestode diagnosis in domestic dogs and cats: the need for accurate and non-invasive techniques
Cestode infections in companion animals pose a significant diagnostic challenge due to intermittent egg shedding and the limitations of traditional coproscopic techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of microscopy and PCR in detecting cestodes in dogs and cats, using necropsy as the gold standard.
A total of 81 animals (46 dogs and 35 cats) were examined by necropsy, with gastrointestinal tracts inspected for cestodes. Fecal samples were collected and analyzed by coproscopy and PCR targeting cestode infections.
Necropsy identified cestodes in 7 (8.6 %; 95 % CI: 4.3 – 16.8) out of 81 animals: Dipylidium caninum was found in 3 (3.7 %; 95 % CI: 1.3 – 10.3) of animals (1/46 dogs; 2/35 cats), and Hydatigera taeniaeformis in 4 (11.4 %; 95 % CI: 4.5 – 26.0) out of 35 cats. Coproscopy and PCR detected only infection with H. taeniaeformis in 2 (5.7 %; 95 % CI: 1.6 – 18.6), and 3 (8.6 %; 95 CI: 3.0–22.4) cats, respectively., No PCR positives were recorded for D. caninum, despite its presence at necropsy. Overall agreement with necropsy was moderate for both methods (coproscopy k = 0.42; PCR k = 0.58), with higher sensitivity and agreement for Taenia spp. and H. taeniaeformis detection. These findings highlight the poor sensitivity of current non-invasive diagnostic methods for cestodes, particularly D. caninum, and the limited correlation between infection intensity and fecal detection. The study advocates for the urgent need for a commercially available coproantigen test to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on:
Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals;
Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases;
Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology;
Disease and infection control or eradication measures;
The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment;
Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis;
Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.