西伊比利亚石碑上的工具痕迹及其复制品的痕迹分析:青铜时代末期的石头和钢铁

IF 2.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Ralph Araque Gonzalez , María-Eugenia Polo , Pablo Paniego Díaz , Vera Rammelkammer , Bastian Asmus , Michael J. Kaiser , Alexander Richter , Giuseppe Vintrici , Rafael Ferreiro Mählmann
{"title":"西伊比利亚石碑上的工具痕迹及其复制品的痕迹分析:青铜时代末期的石头和钢铁","authors":"Ralph Araque Gonzalez ,&nbsp;María-Eugenia Polo ,&nbsp;Pablo Paniego Díaz ,&nbsp;Vera Rammelkammer ,&nbsp;Bastian Asmus ,&nbsp;Michael J. Kaiser ,&nbsp;Alexander Richter ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Vintrici ,&nbsp;Rafael Ferreiro Mählmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For the study of carved rock art, particular tool materials can only be meaningfully hypothesized, identified, or excluded by combining traceological analyses with an accurate understanding of the physical-mechanical properties of the carved rock as well as knowledge of the available tool materials from an archaeological, material analytical, and experimental point of view. The aim of this study was to identify the tools that were used during the Final Bronze Age-Early Iron Age transition (c. 1200-550 BC) for the carving of western Iberian stelae by comparing the work traces on originals and replications with the same rock supports and the archaeologically identified tool-set. This was achieved by the traceological-technological study and categorisation of the carved lines and motifs, based on the profile sections of the engravings, on a sample of four western Iberian stelae made from granite-aplite, meta-arkoses, and silicate quartz-arenite. All components were replicated according to petrological and metallurgical analyses. This approach, which is based on 3D-scans in combination with GIS and a thorough evaluation of digital data, material analyses, and archaeological data, will be presented here for the first time. The application of GIS and DEM for the analysis of the profile sections of carved ornaments provided analytical and graphical results from 444 profiles, allowing the classification in six different profile typologies. The most striking result is that silicate quartz-arenites cannot be carved with bronze tools and that lithic tools only left superficial traces that are very different from the original stelae from this lithology. Therefore, this particular material, which represents over 20 % of all stelae, could only be carved with hardened steel chisels, while many granitoid and sedimentary rocks could also be carved with lithic tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traceological analyses of tool marks on western Iberian stelae and their replications: Stones and steel at the end of the Bronze Age\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Araque Gonzalez ,&nbsp;María-Eugenia Polo ,&nbsp;Pablo Paniego Díaz ,&nbsp;Vera Rammelkammer ,&nbsp;Bastian Asmus ,&nbsp;Michael J. Kaiser ,&nbsp;Alexander Richter ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Vintrici ,&nbsp;Rafael Ferreiro Mählmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For the study of carved rock art, particular tool materials can only be meaningfully hypothesized, identified, or excluded by combining traceological analyses with an accurate understanding of the physical-mechanical properties of the carved rock as well as knowledge of the available tool materials from an archaeological, material analytical, and experimental point of view. The aim of this study was to identify the tools that were used during the Final Bronze Age-Early Iron Age transition (c. 1200-550 BC) for the carving of western Iberian stelae by comparing the work traces on originals and replications with the same rock supports and the archaeologically identified tool-set. This was achieved by the traceological-technological study and categorisation of the carved lines and motifs, based on the profile sections of the engravings, on a sample of four western Iberian stelae made from granite-aplite, meta-arkoses, and silicate quartz-arenite. All components were replicated according to petrological and metallurgical analyses. This approach, which is based on 3D-scans in combination with GIS and a thorough evaluation of digital data, material analyses, and archaeological data, will be presented here for the first time. The application of GIS and DEM for the analysis of the profile sections of carved ornaments provided analytical and graphical results from 444 profiles, allowing the classification in six different profile typologies. The most striking result is that silicate quartz-arenites cannot be carved with bronze tools and that lithic tools only left superficial traces that are very different from the original stelae from this lithology. Therefore, this particular material, which represents over 20 % of all stelae, could only be carved with hardened steel chisels, while many granitoid and sedimentary rocks could also be carved with lithic tools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030544032500189X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030544032500189X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于岩石雕刻艺术的研究,特定的工具材料只能通过结合对雕刻岩石的物理力学特性的准确理解以及从考古学、材料分析和实验的角度对可用工具材料的了解,进行有意义的假设、识别或排除。这项研究的目的是通过比较原物和复制品上的工作痕迹,以及考古鉴定的工具集,确定在最后的青铜时代到早期铁器时代过渡时期(公元前1200-550年)用于雕刻西伊比利亚石碑的工具。这是通过对雕刻线条和图案的痕迹技术研究和分类来实现的,基于雕刻的剖面,在四个西伊比利亚石碑的样本上,由花岗岩-阿布利岩、元长石和硅酸盐石英-砂岩制成。根据岩石学和冶金学分析,复制了所有成分。这种方法是基于3d扫描与GIS相结合,并对数字数据、材料分析和考古数据进行全面评估,将在这里首次提出。应用GIS和DEM对雕刻饰品的剖面进行分析,提供了444个剖面的分析和图形结果,允许将其分类为六种不同的剖面类型。最引人注目的结果是,硅酸盐石英砂岩不能用青铜工具雕刻,而石器工具只留下与该岩性下原始石碑非常不同的表面痕迹。因此,这种特殊的材料,占所有石碑的20%以上,只能用硬化的钢凿雕刻,而许多花岗岩和沉积岩也可以用石器工具雕刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traceological analyses of tool marks on western Iberian stelae and their replications: Stones and steel at the end of the Bronze Age
For the study of carved rock art, particular tool materials can only be meaningfully hypothesized, identified, or excluded by combining traceological analyses with an accurate understanding of the physical-mechanical properties of the carved rock as well as knowledge of the available tool materials from an archaeological, material analytical, and experimental point of view. The aim of this study was to identify the tools that were used during the Final Bronze Age-Early Iron Age transition (c. 1200-550 BC) for the carving of western Iberian stelae by comparing the work traces on originals and replications with the same rock supports and the archaeologically identified tool-set. This was achieved by the traceological-technological study and categorisation of the carved lines and motifs, based on the profile sections of the engravings, on a sample of four western Iberian stelae made from granite-aplite, meta-arkoses, and silicate quartz-arenite. All components were replicated according to petrological and metallurgical analyses. This approach, which is based on 3D-scans in combination with GIS and a thorough evaluation of digital data, material analyses, and archaeological data, will be presented here for the first time. The application of GIS and DEM for the analysis of the profile sections of carved ornaments provided analytical and graphical results from 444 profiles, allowing the classification in six different profile typologies. The most striking result is that silicate quartz-arenites cannot be carved with bronze tools and that lithic tools only left superficial traces that are very different from the original stelae from this lithology. Therefore, this particular material, which represents over 20 % of all stelae, could only be carved with hardened steel chisels, while many granitoid and sedimentary rocks could also be carved with lithic tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信