强迫移民妇女在产妇护理中的排斥和其他:对德国强迫移民母亲和保健专业人员的定性研究

IF 2.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Martha Engelhardt , Mathilde Gaudion , Elizabeth Mohr , Jasmin Kamhiye , Razan Al Munjid , Liane Schenk , Theda Borde
{"title":"强迫移民妇女在产妇护理中的排斥和其他:对德国强迫移民母亲和保健专业人员的定性研究","authors":"Martha Engelhardt ,&nbsp;Mathilde Gaudion ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Mohr ,&nbsp;Jasmin Kamhiye ,&nbsp;Razan Al Munjid ,&nbsp;Liane Schenk ,&nbsp;Theda Borde","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article investigates the political, legal, institutional, and interpersonal experiences of exclusion and <em>Othering</em> that forced migrant mothers encountered during pregnancy, birth and up to one year postpartum. Problem-centred qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 forced migrant mothers and 80 maternity health care professionals (HCPs) in Berlin, Brandenburg and NRW, Germany. All mothers had recently given birth to a child in a hospital. Mothers were between 24 and 39 years old and were living in Germany for an average of three years. The sample represented a broad heterogeneity in country of origin, family constellation, level of education and housing conditions. Based on the framework method (Gale et al., 2013), three interrelated dimensions of exclusion in maternity care were identified: <em>(1) Political and legal exclusion</em> (e.g., housing restrictions, lack of legal documents, insecure residency); <em>(2) Institutional exclusion</em> (e.g., absence of interpreters, staff shortage, non-recognition of qualifications); and <em>(3) Interpersonal exclusion</em> (e.g., racism, stereotyping, social isolation). These dimensions of exclusion are further illuminated through the concept of <em>Othering</em>, understood as a symbolic process that legitimises and reinforces social inequality. In the context of forced migration, maternity care is shaped to a considerable extent by exclusionary state practices and systemic barriers. Our findings underscore the need for structural change to reduce barriers, strengthen equity, and protect reproductive autonomy. This is the first qualitative study in Germany to explore these issues from both the perspective of forced migrant mothers and HCPs across regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exclusion and Othering in maternity care for forced migrant women: a qualitative study with forced migrant mothers and health care professionals in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Martha Engelhardt ,&nbsp;Mathilde Gaudion ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Mohr ,&nbsp;Jasmin Kamhiye ,&nbsp;Razan Al Munjid ,&nbsp;Liane Schenk ,&nbsp;Theda Borde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article investigates the political, legal, institutional, and interpersonal experiences of exclusion and <em>Othering</em> that forced migrant mothers encountered during pregnancy, birth and up to one year postpartum. Problem-centred qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 forced migrant mothers and 80 maternity health care professionals (HCPs) in Berlin, Brandenburg and NRW, Germany. All mothers had recently given birth to a child in a hospital. Mothers were between 24 and 39 years old and were living in Germany for an average of three years. The sample represented a broad heterogeneity in country of origin, family constellation, level of education and housing conditions. Based on the framework method (Gale et al., 2013), three interrelated dimensions of exclusion in maternity care were identified: <em>(1) Political and legal exclusion</em> (e.g., housing restrictions, lack of legal documents, insecure residency); <em>(2) Institutional exclusion</em> (e.g., absence of interpreters, staff shortage, non-recognition of qualifications); and <em>(3) Interpersonal exclusion</em> (e.g., racism, stereotyping, social isolation). These dimensions of exclusion are further illuminated through the concept of <em>Othering</em>, understood as a symbolic process that legitimises and reinforces social inequality. In the context of forced migration, maternity care is shaped to a considerable extent by exclusionary state practices and systemic barriers. Our findings underscore the need for structural change to reduce barriers, strengthen equity, and protect reproductive autonomy. This is the first qualitative study in Germany to explore these issues from both the perspective of forced migrant mothers and HCPs across regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文调查了被迫移民母亲在怀孕、分娩和产后一年内所遭遇的政治、法律、制度和人际关系上的排斥和其他经历。对德国柏林、勃兰登堡和北威州的33名被迫移民母亲和80名产妇保健专业人员进行了以问题为中心的定性访谈。所有母亲最近都在医院生了一个孩子。这些母亲的年龄在24岁到39岁之间,平均在德国生活了3年。样本在原籍国、家庭结构、教育水平和住房条件方面表现出广泛的异质性。基于框架方法(Gale et al., 2013),确定了产妇护理中排斥的三个相互关联的维度:(1)政治和法律排斥(例如,住房限制、缺乏法律文件、不安全居住);(2)机构排斥(如缺少口译员、工作人员短缺、不承认资格);(3)人际排斥(如种族主义、刻板印象、社会孤立)。通过“他者”的概念进一步阐明了这些排斥的维度,将其理解为使社会不平等合法化和强化的象征性过程。在被迫移民的背景下,产妇保健在很大程度上受到国家排他性做法和系统性障碍的影响。我们的研究结果强调了结构性改革的必要性,以减少障碍,加强公平,保护生殖自主权。这是德国第一个从强迫移民母亲和跨地区保健服务提供者的角度探讨这些问题的定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exclusion and Othering in maternity care for forced migrant women: a qualitative study with forced migrant mothers and health care professionals in Germany
This article investigates the political, legal, institutional, and interpersonal experiences of exclusion and Othering that forced migrant mothers encountered during pregnancy, birth and up to one year postpartum. Problem-centred qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 forced migrant mothers and 80 maternity health care professionals (HCPs) in Berlin, Brandenburg and NRW, Germany. All mothers had recently given birth to a child in a hospital. Mothers were between 24 and 39 years old and were living in Germany for an average of three years. The sample represented a broad heterogeneity in country of origin, family constellation, level of education and housing conditions. Based on the framework method (Gale et al., 2013), three interrelated dimensions of exclusion in maternity care were identified: (1) Political and legal exclusion (e.g., housing restrictions, lack of legal documents, insecure residency); (2) Institutional exclusion (e.g., absence of interpreters, staff shortage, non-recognition of qualifications); and (3) Interpersonal exclusion (e.g., racism, stereotyping, social isolation). These dimensions of exclusion are further illuminated through the concept of Othering, understood as a symbolic process that legitimises and reinforces social inequality. In the context of forced migration, maternity care is shaped to a considerable extent by exclusionary state practices and systemic barriers. Our findings underscore the need for structural change to reduce barriers, strengthen equity, and protect reproductive autonomy. This is the first qualitative study in Germany to explore these issues from both the perspective of forced migrant mothers and HCPs across regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信