Linda Engelmann, Imke Haverkämper, Wiktoria Wilkowska, Martina Ziefle
{"title":"直接空气碳捕获和储存的感知利益和障碍:使用结构方程模型在德国公民中应用整体视角","authors":"Linda Engelmann, Imke Haverkämper, Wiktoria Wilkowska, Martina Ziefle","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technologies such as Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS) are designed to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases by capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in geological formations. Public acceptance plays a critical role in the successful implementation of sustainable technologies. This study therefore investigates which factors influence the acceptance of DACCS through an online survey conducted with a German lay sample (N = 908). Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, we examine the perception of DACCS, Direct Air Capture (DAC), and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to examine the factors contributing to technology perception and the influence they have on DACCS acceptance, along with person-related characteristics.</div><div>The findings reveal that DAC is viewed more positively than CCS and DACCS, both affectively and cognitively (i.e., perceived benefits and barriers). Acceptance of DACCS is moderate. The structural model indicates that DACCS acceptance is directly shaped by perceptions of its benefits and barriers, and by characteristics such as gender and education. Participants’ affective evaluations and openness to innovation indirectly influence acceptance. The segmentation of DAC, CCS, and DACCS emphasizes the relationship between technology perceptions and their respective influence on technology acceptance.</div><div>This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the psychological and social drivers of public acceptance and highlights the need to consider both the individual components and the composite nature of CO<sub>2</sub> removal technologies in communication and policy design. The results underscore the importance of public perceptions in shaping the feasibility of implementing DACCS at scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104270"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived benefits and barriers of direct air carbon capture and storage: Applying a holistic perspective among German citizens using structural equation modeling\",\"authors\":\"Linda Engelmann, Imke Haverkämper, Wiktoria Wilkowska, Martina Ziefle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technologies such as Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS) are designed to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases by capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in geological formations. Public acceptance plays a critical role in the successful implementation of sustainable technologies. This study therefore investigates which factors influence the acceptance of DACCS through an online survey conducted with a German lay sample (N = 908). Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, we examine the perception of DACCS, Direct Air Capture (DAC), and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to examine the factors contributing to technology perception and the influence they have on DACCS acceptance, along with person-related characteristics.</div><div>The findings reveal that DAC is viewed more positively than CCS and DACCS, both affectively and cognitively (i.e., perceived benefits and barriers). Acceptance of DACCS is moderate. The structural model indicates that DACCS acceptance is directly shaped by perceptions of its benefits and barriers, and by characteristics such as gender and education. Participants’ affective evaluations and openness to innovation indirectly influence acceptance. The segmentation of DAC, CCS, and DACCS emphasizes the relationship between technology perceptions and their respective influence on technology acceptance.</div><div>This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the psychological and social drivers of public acceptance and highlights the need to consider both the individual components and the composite nature of CO<sub>2</sub> removal technologies in communication and policy design. The results underscore the importance of public perceptions in shaping the feasibility of implementing DACCS at scale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003512\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived benefits and barriers of direct air carbon capture and storage: Applying a holistic perspective among German citizens using structural equation modeling
Technologies such as Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS) are designed to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases by capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in geological formations. Public acceptance plays a critical role in the successful implementation of sustainable technologies. This study therefore investigates which factors influence the acceptance of DACCS through an online survey conducted with a German lay sample (N = 908). Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, we examine the perception of DACCS, Direct Air Capture (DAC), and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to examine the factors contributing to technology perception and the influence they have on DACCS acceptance, along with person-related characteristics.
The findings reveal that DAC is viewed more positively than CCS and DACCS, both affectively and cognitively (i.e., perceived benefits and barriers). Acceptance of DACCS is moderate. The structural model indicates that DACCS acceptance is directly shaped by perceptions of its benefits and barriers, and by characteristics such as gender and education. Participants’ affective evaluations and openness to innovation indirectly influence acceptance. The segmentation of DAC, CCS, and DACCS emphasizes the relationship between technology perceptions and their respective influence on technology acceptance.
This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the psychological and social drivers of public acceptance and highlights the need to consider both the individual components and the composite nature of CO2 removal technologies in communication and policy design. The results underscore the importance of public perceptions in shaping the feasibility of implementing DACCS at scale.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.