新西兰牧场乳制品生产系统中的温室气体减排:减排方案及其相互作用的审查

Erandi Kalehe Kankanamge , Thiagarajah Ramilan , Peter R. Tozer , Cecile de Klein , Alvaro Romera , Simone Pieralli
{"title":"新西兰牧场乳制品生产系统中的温室气体减排:减排方案及其相互作用的审查","authors":"Erandi Kalehe Kankanamge ,&nbsp;Thiagarajah Ramilan ,&nbsp;Peter R. Tozer ,&nbsp;Cecile de Klein ,&nbsp;Alvaro Romera ,&nbsp;Simone Pieralli","doi":"10.1016/j.csag.2025.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy farming is crucial for mitigating climate change and enhancing the environmental credentials of New Zealand's dairy exports. This paper aims to explore potential GHG mitigation measures and their interactive effects when combined within New Zealand context, emphasising the practicality of these combinations, particularly focusing on recent studies of pasture-based dairy systems. The review assesses various mitigation options across animal, manure management, feed-based, soil-related, and system-related interventions and identifies immediately applicable mitigation options based on specific criteria. It also discusses the implementation costs, implications on emissions, and the combined effects of these options when applied as bundles in pasture-based systems using a combination matrix. It is indicated that mitigation options on New Zealand's dairy farms can yield diverse outcomes and costs based on farming characteristics. By analysing different combinations of short-listed, it was found that although most mitigation options are compatible, some may have a lower overall reduction potential because of interaction effects. Integrating lower N fertiliser use, low-emission feed, and reduced stocking rates with high-performing animals provides a practical approach for GHG reductions and potential cost savings. However, implementing compatible mitigation bundles requires better quantification of their interactions, economic viability, and compatibility with existing farming systems which need further research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100262,"journal":{"name":"Climate Smart Agriculture","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greenhouse gas mitigation in pasture-based dairy production systems in New Zealand: A review of mitigation options and their interactions\",\"authors\":\"Erandi Kalehe Kankanamge ,&nbsp;Thiagarajah Ramilan ,&nbsp;Peter R. Tozer ,&nbsp;Cecile de Klein ,&nbsp;Alvaro Romera ,&nbsp;Simone Pieralli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csag.2025.100071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy farming is crucial for mitigating climate change and enhancing the environmental credentials of New Zealand's dairy exports. This paper aims to explore potential GHG mitigation measures and their interactive effects when combined within New Zealand context, emphasising the practicality of these combinations, particularly focusing on recent studies of pasture-based dairy systems. The review assesses various mitigation options across animal, manure management, feed-based, soil-related, and system-related interventions and identifies immediately applicable mitigation options based on specific criteria. It also discusses the implementation costs, implications on emissions, and the combined effects of these options when applied as bundles in pasture-based systems using a combination matrix. It is indicated that mitigation options on New Zealand's dairy farms can yield diverse outcomes and costs based on farming characteristics. By analysing different combinations of short-listed, it was found that although most mitigation options are compatible, some may have a lower overall reduction potential because of interaction effects. Integrating lower N fertiliser use, low-emission feed, and reduced stocking rates with high-performing animals provides a practical approach for GHG reductions and potential cost savings. However, implementing compatible mitigation bundles requires better quantification of their interactions, economic viability, and compatibility with existing farming systems which need further research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Smart Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Smart Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409025000322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Smart Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409025000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减少奶牛场的温室气体(GHG)排放对于缓解气候变化和提高新西兰乳制品出口的环境信誉至关重要。本文旨在探讨潜在的温室气体缓解措施及其在新西兰背景下的相互作用,强调这些组合的实用性,特别关注最近对牧场乳制品系统的研究。该评估评估了动物、粪便管理、饲料、土壤相关和系统相关干预措施的各种缓解方案,并根据具体标准确定了立即适用的缓解方案。它还讨论了实施成本、对排放的影响,以及使用组合矩阵将这些选项捆绑应用于基于牧场的系统时的综合影响。报告指出,新西兰奶牛场的缓解方案可根据养殖特点产生不同的结果和成本。通过分析入围方案的不同组合,发现虽然大多数缓解备选方案是兼容的,但由于相互作用的影响,有些备选方案的总体减排潜力可能较低。将低氮肥用量、低排放饲料和降低放养率与高性能动物相结合,为减少温室气体排放和节省潜在成本提供了切实可行的方法。然而,要实施兼容的一揽子缓解措施,需要更好地量化它们的相互作用、经济可行性以及与现有耕作系统的兼容性,这需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Greenhouse gas mitigation in pasture-based dairy production systems in New Zealand: A review of mitigation options and their interactions

Greenhouse gas mitigation in pasture-based dairy production systems in New Zealand: A review of mitigation options and their interactions
Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy farming is crucial for mitigating climate change and enhancing the environmental credentials of New Zealand's dairy exports. This paper aims to explore potential GHG mitigation measures and their interactive effects when combined within New Zealand context, emphasising the practicality of these combinations, particularly focusing on recent studies of pasture-based dairy systems. The review assesses various mitigation options across animal, manure management, feed-based, soil-related, and system-related interventions and identifies immediately applicable mitigation options based on specific criteria. It also discusses the implementation costs, implications on emissions, and the combined effects of these options when applied as bundles in pasture-based systems using a combination matrix. It is indicated that mitigation options on New Zealand's dairy farms can yield diverse outcomes and costs based on farming characteristics. By analysing different combinations of short-listed, it was found that although most mitigation options are compatible, some may have a lower overall reduction potential because of interaction effects. Integrating lower N fertiliser use, low-emission feed, and reduced stocking rates with high-performing animals provides a practical approach for GHG reductions and potential cost savings. However, implementing compatible mitigation bundles requires better quantification of their interactions, economic viability, and compatibility with existing farming systems which need further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信